寄托家园留学论坛 › 论坛 › 寄托学术类备考版 › GRE考试综合版 › OG上的P321的一道verbal题

返回列表

查看: 1960|回复: 4

[问答] OG上的P321的一道verbal题 [复制链接]

我是必胜客
UID: 3071701

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 83
注册时间: 2011-5-6
精华: 0
帖子: 2

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2011-11-7 09:19:49 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

Sparva, unlike Treland’s other provinces, requires automobile insurers to pay for any
medical treatment sought by someone who has been involved in an accident; in the
other provinces, insurers pay for nonemergency treatment only if they preapprove the
treatment. Clearly, Sparva’s less restrictive policy must be the explanation for the fact
that altogether insurers there pay for far more treatments after accidents than insurers
in other provinces, even though Sparva does not have the largest population.

7. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A Car insurance costs more in Sparva than in any other province.
B The cost of medical care in Sparva is higher than the national average.
C Different insurance companies have different standards for determining what constitutes emergency treatment.
D Fewer insurance companies operate in Sparva than in any other province.
E There are fewer traffic accidents annually in Sparva than in any of the provinces of comparable or greater population.

这道题不是太明白，the most strengthens the argument?不是说Sparva province的treatments for accidents is more than other provices in Treland吗？
请高手能不能解释详细点。
看来自己的逻辑思维能力不够好啊。

321页, treatments

相关帖子 Updated by 2024.11.30

有得必有失，有失必有得。

回应
0

使用道具举报

我是必胜客
UID: 3071701

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 83
注册时间: 2011-5-6
精华: 0
帖子: 2

沙发

发表于 2011-11-7 09:22:55 |只看该作者

我看后面的解释是：
One obvious explanation for there being more medical treatments in
Sparva is that there are more accidents there. Choice E rules out that explanation. So
Choice E strengthens the argument in the passage and is the correct answer.
自己别在这里了，就是转不过来弯！

有得必有失，有失必有得。

【2025FALL】全站祈福已开放~~来领祈福章，求offer得offer

使用道具举报

我是必胜客
UID: 3071701

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 83
注册时间: 2011-5-6
精华: 0
帖子: 2

板凳

发表于 2011-11-7 16:04:53 |只看该作者

难道是RP问题，大家都路过，不给看下？

有得必有失，有失必有得。

使用道具举报

angengsam
UID: 3024641

初级会员

Rank: 3 Rank: 3

声望: 63
寄托币: 532
注册时间: 2011-3-7
精华: 0
帖子: 81

地板

发表于 2011-11-29 23:05:32 |只看该作者

本帖最后由 angengsam 于 2011-11-29 23:08 编辑

可能的一个原因是事故数量多，所以会造成文中所说的结果，但是E排出了这种可能，所以就相当于加强了文中的原因

已有 1 人评分	声望	收起理由
dandeliontt	+ 3	正解~

总评分: 声望 + 3 查看全部投币

使用道具举报

杨佐罗 UID: 2911388 杨佐罗当前离线最后登录 2013-8-1 在线时间 188 小时寄托币 0 声望 47 注册时间 2010-9-21 阅读权限 0 帖子 69 精华 0 积分 927 UID 2911388 禁止访问声望 47 寄托币 0 注册时间 2010-9-21 精华 0 帖子 69 主页发消息	5楼发表于 2011-11-29 23:20:03 \|只看该作者提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽
	签名被屏蔽
	使用道具举报