- 最后登录
- 2020-6-16
- 在线时间
- 74 小时
- 寄托币
- 133
- 声望
- 50
- 注册时间
- 2015-1-29
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 28
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 125
- UID
- 3592121
- 声望
- 50
- 寄托币
- 133
- 注册时间
- 2015-1-29
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 28
|
本帖最后由 kryang 于 2015-6-6 11:15 编辑
Argument 1
Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a 'Palean' basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
*****************************************************
According to the passage, the author intends to prove that Palean baskets were not owned solely by Palean people. In the reading material, the author states several points that may be reasonable, yet these evidences are not tenable enough to support the opinion and we need to reconsider the issue from more rational perspectives.
First, the author puts it in the passage that it is Palean people who made the baskets, the ones obtaining special features by weaving, because the only sites where people find the baskets are located around Palea. However, the reasoning is weak since other explanations can refute the idea. For example, the fact that archeologist have not found the baskets outside of Palea, cannot indicate that there is no possibility to excavate a basket at other places. People may have not found the existence of the baskets because the baskets can be eroded or broken into pieces or ruins that no archeologists can recognize. Therefore, we are not sure whether the baskets exist in other region, it is unconvincing to say that the only place we can find a woven basket is only in Palea, nor the statement that the baskets are made by Paleans. Unless we find evidences powerful enough, such as historical records, which particularize the origin of the woven basket, we just do not get closer to the fact.
Also, the passage states that the river is so deep that the Palean forebears cannot have approaches to reach to another side, thus, the geographical obstacles would limit the spread of the woven basket. But the statement is based on the assumption that the river is not only deep at present but at ancient times when the Paleans engages the relevant activities of woven baskets. This assumption is of much doubt because the depth of the river in ancient times is what we cannot assess precisely, and if the river was once shallow enough to allow Paleans go across it, it may be probable for them to bring the woven baskets to other places like Lithos, which as a consequence, escalates the spread of the baskets. Given by these possibilities, it is arbitrary to say that the ancient Paleans cannot go across the river. To make the statement more convincing, the author needs to illustrate the history of the transformations of the river to determine if Paleans once had gone across it.
Last but not least, the writer maintains that a new basket found in Lithos belies the origin of the basket which once considered being Paleans. But there can be other theories which may work in this situation. For instance, Palea may be isolated by the river, but merchants who take the woven basket to other places may be factor that precipitates the spreading process of the basket. A Palean merchant may transport the woven baskets by horses to travel to another town, selling some of the baskets to another salesman. And luckily the salesman came to Lithos and sold one to a local, which preserves as the newest discoveries of woven baskets. Under this circumstance, the evidence of the new finding is invalid to support the argument. A good method to prove the argument is to compare the age of the basket in Palea with that of the one in Lithos.
The author does consider of some facts involving in this issue, while the unstable reasoning as well as suspecting arguments make his/her logic imperfect to reveal the true aspect of the woven basket, which, I suggest, may need to be studied further.
第一次好好写,但感觉太啰嗦了,594字(当然不是计时写的)。。
仔细回顾了一下,我的问题是句子写得太长了。。 |
|