[i习作temp] Issue144 高频题, 有拍必回 [复制链接]

sunwuliang
UID：157651

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 86
注册时间: 2004-3-8
精华: 0
帖子: 0

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2005-8-2 22:53:48 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

Issue 144:
"It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
自我介绍一下，成都8月29考，时间紧迫，经验不足，希望各位大牛多多指导哈
45分钟，403字，
15分钟修改，550字

Is it the artist, or the critic, who gives society something of lasting value? This question seems a little confusing that many people have different opinions about the works of the artist and the critic. I concede that the artist leaves us a great deal of eternal valuable works. But while we value the contribution of the artist, there is no need to trivialize the significance of the critic's work.

Admittedly, the artist creates a great deal of marvelous works which are the perpetual treasures of the society. The artist, who often possesses some kind of special inspiration, likely to observe the society in some different ways and find the virtue and vice of the society that other people can not easily see. Then the artist can initiate some new ideas to describe what he or she sees, what he or she hears, and what he or she feels. That's how most of the artist’s works came into being. In addition, some of the artist’s works are significantly special and highly generalize the symbol of the society. And these works can be carefully preserved and passed onto the following generations. So the artist leaves the valuable treasure to the society.

However, the function of the critic's work should not be oversimplified. The critic, who makes comments on the works of the artist as a job, can evaluate, filter, and category such works. Thus they can save the time of the judgment for the people, who can benefit from the good works and not been influenced by the bad works. For example, modern people are under great pressure of work, competition, and survival. And they expect that the directors' excellent films can bring them pleasure, release, and recreation. At the same time, these people are very busy, and they lack the time to make judgment whether the films are beneficial or detrimental to their mental health. The film critics’ work and responsibility can lead the right value-oriented, which can help people to establish the generally recognition to the film-makers’ works. So people can easily make judgment whether the film is worth watching before they become involved in its content.

Moreover, the critic can exhume the valuable works of some less famous artists. A artist who is less famous and never heard of by most of people before has written an excellent book. And after this book is put on the bookshelf in stores, how many customers will notice it at a glance over so many covers of books? The probability is approximately to zero. Now that if this book lack the chance to be read and evaluated, how can its significance can be accepted by the public? But how lucky the book may be. Because our society has such book critics, who are likely to read all the latest books as a job or their self interest. And if one of the critics discover the book’s value, through introduction and recommendation by many means, the significance of the book will be accepted and valued.

In conclusion, the artists indeed provide people with many lasting valuable things. But when we enjoy the pleasure of these masterpieces, we should not overlook the critics’ constructive and valuable works, which contributes greatly to systematizing artists’ work and exhuming the meaningful pieces overlooked by the public.

回应
0

使用道具举报

dapopi
UID：191236

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 275
注册时间: 2005-1-4
精华: 0
帖子: 0

沙发

发表于 2005-8-2 22:57:38 |只看该作者

你8.29成都啊？
我9.1成都
呵呵

使用道具举报

sunwuliang
UID：157651

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 86
注册时间: 2004-3-8
精华: 0
帖子: 0

板凳

发表于 2005-8-2 23:15:10 |只看该作者

Originally posted by dapopi at 2005-8-2 22:57
你8.29成都啊？
我9.1成都
呵呵

那更好哈，留下连接和QQ, 大家一起互改麻

我的QQ: 13954759

使用道具举报

小玩
UID：2111777

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 0
寄托币: 1150
注册时间: 2005-6-27
精华: 0
帖子: 138

地板

发表于 2005-8-2 23:45:50 |只看该作者

Is it the artist, or the critic, who 删 gives society something of lasting value? This question seems a little confusing that many people have different opinions about the works of the artist and the critic. I concede that the artist leaves us a great deal of eternal valuable works. But while we value the contribution of the artist, there is no need to trivialize the significance of the critic's work.

Admittedly, the artist creates a great deal of marvelous works which are the perpetual treasures of the society. The artist, who often possesses some kind of special inspiration, likely to observe the society in some different ways and find the virtue and vice of the society that other people can not easily see. 不是很赞同，谁说艺术家就一定能看透呢？我觉得艺术家也来源于大众嘛，只是他们用自己的作品表达自己的感情或看法什么的 Then the artist can initiate some new ideas to describe what he or she sees, what he or she hears, and what he or she feels. That's how most of the artist’s works came into being. In addition, some of the artist’s works are significantly special and highly generalize the symbol of the society. And these works can be carefully preserved and passed onto the following generations. 可以再展开点，譬如说什么works呢？ So the artist leaves the valuable treasure to the society.

However, the function of the critic's work should not be oversimplified. The critic, who makes comments on the works of the artist as a job, can evaluate, filter, and category such works. Thus they can save the time of the judgment for the people, who can benefit from the good works and not been influenced by the bad works. For example, modern people are under great pressure of work, competition, and survival. And they expect that the directors' excellent films can bring them pleasure, release, and recreation. At the same time, these people are very busy, and they lack the time to make judgment whether the films are beneficial or detrimental to their mental health. The film critics’ work and responsibility can lead the right value-oriented, which can help people to establish the generally recognition to the film-makers’ works. So people can easily make judgment whether the film is worth watching before they become involved in its content. 这种关于评论家的作用的论证倒是蛮新颖，跟大多数人都不太一样，但严谨不足啊。难道影评家的评论对人们是否选择一部电影有决定性的作用么？不见得吧。而且对于同一部作品，评论家往往有很部相同甚至截然相反的评价，而往往又是这样的一种争议性吸引人们蜂拥而至。这个现象还是比较普遍的吧？用你的论证怎么解释呢？

Moreover, the critic can exhume the valuable works of some less famous artists. A artist who is less famous and never heard of by most of people before has written an excellent book. And after this book is put on the bookshelf in stores, how many customers will notice it at a glance over so many covers of books? The probability is approximately to zero. Now that if this book lack the chance to be read and evaluated, how can its significance can be accepted by the public? But how lucky the book may be. Because our society has such book critics, who are likely to read all the latest books as a job or their self interest. And if one of the critics discover the book’s value, through introduction and recommendation by many means, the significance of the book will be accepted and valued. 语言读起来有点别扭

In conclusion, the artists indeed provide people with many lasting valuable things. But when we enjoy the pleasure of these masterpieces, we should not overlook the critics’ constructive and valuable works, which contributes greatly to systematizing artists’ work and exhuming the meaningful pieces overlooked by the public.

有个我认为比较严重的问题，题目中只说谁give … something of lasting value，显然你是赞成艺术家的，但谈得不多，从篇幅看；当然你可以扩展一些有关评论家对发现、宣扬、传承这种lasting value的内容，但重点在前面~~个人意见哈，参考！

语法单词就没仔细看了，好像还是有些问题，自己找找看了~~

继续加油哈！！改天我也写写看~~艺术类的东西就是折磨人!!