- 最后登录
- 2006-6-24
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 697
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-5-14
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 573
- UID
- 2101725
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 697
- 注册时间
- 2005-5-14
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
我自己总结的模板,可以参照一下!!!一定要就修改啊!!!我考试就用这个,不改我们就雷同了!!!考试的时候先找找有什么错误,然后把开头段,结尾段和相应的模板敲上去,再填空!!! 版权所有,严禁copy! 但可模仿!
P START
In this argument, the arguer conclude that
,to support this conclusion ,the arguer cites the evidence that
to further support this conclusion, the author also points out that
however, close scrutiny of these facts reveals that they lend little credible support to the conclusion.
1.C.E.=false causal relationship
.the arguer unfairly assume that a is attributed to b with insufficient evidence. However , the arguer irrationally fails to take into the fact that there may be some other possible reasons could also result in a. For instance ,perhaps.
.Without ruling out all other possible factors, the arguer could not convince me that b led to a.
2.SURVEY
Representative
the arguer provide no evidence to testify that the cited statistics in the survey is necessarily representative of general c. Lacking such evidence, the arguer's assumption that f is suspectable. Unless the arguer provide effective evidence to prove that the a is representative ,I will not agree that the survey could forcefully sustain the conclusion.
VAGUE DATA
the arguer does not acquaint me what the percentage of A in all B
the C is merely a vague data
According, it is not true that
3.SUFFICIENCY and NECESSITY conditions
the arguer illogically assert that f will sufficiently cause b. Nevertheless, the arguer does not furnish ample evidence to attest that a is a sufficient condition. Generally speaking,
Consequently, merely b may not solve the problem.
Considering the arguer ignores other possible necessary conditions, I could agree that b sufficiently lead to a.
P END
To sum up, lacking ample and powerful facts, the arguer could not persuade me to believe that her conclusion is rational and correct. To effectively bolster this conclusion, the arguer must provide convincing evidence that might include the following: a survey showing that a research showing that statistics showing that
To better evaluate this conclusion, I would also need to know
4F.A.=false analogy
the arguer assert that all
However,the arguer ignores the diversity of as' circumstances.
Even if a
no one could predict that other as will also without ample evidence
perhaps a ,is a
but some other as, such as, in contrast, maybe
considering the arguer fails to take into account the fact that the conditions of as may be different, it is not logical to assert that other as , even , it is not necessary to
5F.C. =false compare
The arguer assert that
However, the arguer ignores the circumstances of a and b may be entirely different,
Perhaps c,
But d ,in contrast, may be
Considering the arguer fails to take into account the fact that the conditions of c and d may be different, it is illogical to assert that a is better that b
6.I.T. =incomplete thought
granted that
the arguer assume that only based on the fact that a
However, the arguer may ignore some other factors ,such as the c, that could also decide
moreover, it is entirely possible that the a only serve little function in
As a common sense, the c usually play a vital role in
Considering the arguer may ignore some possible deciding factors, her conclusion is illogical
7.反证
Finally, even if the a could adequately embody the b, however, c suggests that d, If this is the case, the conclusion that nd is paradoxical. |
|