寄托天下
查看: 930|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] issue4 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
40
注册时间
2006-4-16
精华
0
帖子
1
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2007-8-7 22:52:53 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
4."No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."


I agree with the speaker's opinion that every scientific area needs outsiders with their knowledge and experience to advance, deeper or wider. Simply, no area of science can progress in vacuum. Valuable knowledge and experience from outsiders can help a field of study to dig deeper as well as grow bigger.

On one hand, if experts of one area want to investigate further, basic knowledge and inspiration from other subjects are indispensable. Specific expertise in one area alone may confine the development of this subject, to some extent. To illustrate this point, a representative case in point is the subject of anthropology. As is known to all, anthropology is processing on basis of subjects such as geology, literature, physics, chemistry and history. To access each step forward in anthropology, it would involve the work of a geologist to discovery bones or belongings of ancient human beings, a physicist along with chemist to analyze the discovered stuff and deduce the exact existing time, a historian to give what was happening in that period of time or even a literature critic to give reference from literature from that period of time. Without all these basic support, anthropology can hardly make any great advancement. Another sound example is the famous scientist Nash with his theory of equilibrium. Mathematician as he is, his contribution to economics is beyond compliment. As he states," maths give me inspirations and inspirations lead me to this". No one can deny that besides his individual efforts, the guide and afflatus from maths play an irreplaceable role in the tremendous progress he made in economics. Therefore, outsiders' new ideas and basic knowledge are essential in a scientific area's progressing. Operated in vacuum, a subject is unlikely to get significant achievement or at best reach it extremely slow.

On the other, when one subject step into another, new subject spring up which help each of the original area to develop more comprehensively and vigorously. In the modern scientific field, any subject needs progressing deeper as well as wider. Meld with a different subject can bring a wider field of vision and a wholly new branch combined merits of both. Such new branches would make bring about great advancement. We should look no further than biochemistry--subject brings great benefits to modern society. Equipped with knowledge from both areas, biochemistry is playing an increasingly important part in genetic engineering, producing artificial organs and so forth. Along with this pioneer, chemistry and biology are making significant advancement. Also, it is the same when it comes to geophysics, which has already showed its potential in solving some difficult problems, such as revealing the process of ancient changes to earth and so forth. If a well developed area sticks to its confined field and refused to let other areas step in, this area is unlikely to make any progress.

In sum, without the assistance from other subjects, anthropologists would still be wondering about where human beings came from. Without melding, chemists and biologists would never dream of the contribution they have made to modern society. When one field is bogged, outsiders are likely to have the strength to pull it out.
回应
0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
381
注册时间
2002-10-17
精华
0
帖子
7
沙发
发表于 2007-8-11 14:25:09 |只看该作者
I agree with the speaker's opinion that every scientific area needs outsiders with their knowledge and experience to advance, deeper or wider. Simply, no area of science can progress in vacuum. Valuable knowledge and experience from outsiders can help a field of study to dig deeper as well as grow bigger.

On one hand, if experts of one area want to investigate further, basic knowledge and inspiration from other subjects are indispensable. Specific expertise in one area alone may confine the development of this subject, to some extent. To illustrate this point, a representative case in point is the subject of anthropology. As is known to all, anthropology is processing on basis of subjects such as geology, literature, physics, chemistry and history. To access each step forward in anthropology, it would involve the work of a geologist to discovery bones or belongings of ancient human beings, a physicist along with chemist to analyze the discovered stuff and deduce the exact existing time, a historian to give what was happening in that period of time or even a literature critic to give reference from literature from that period of time. Without all these basic support, anthropology can hardly make any great advancement(例子表述很充分). Another sound example is the famous scientist Nash with his theory of equilibrium. Mathematician as he is, his contribution to economics is beyond compliment. As he states," maths give me inspirations and inspirations lead me to this". No one can deny that besides his individual efforts, the guide and afflatus from maths play an irreplaceable role in the tremendous progress he made in economics. Therefore, outsiders' new ideas and basic knowledge are essential in a scientific area's progressing. Operated in vacuum, a subject is unlikely to get significant achievement or at best reach it extremely slow.


On the other (hand), when one subject step(steps) into another, new subject spring(springs) up which helps each of the original area to develop more comprehensively and vigorously. In the modern scientific field, any subject needs progressing deeper as well as wider. Meld(Medling) with a different subject can bring a wider field of vision and a wholly new branch combined merits of both. Such new branches would make bring about great advancement. We should look no further than biochemistry--subject brings great benefits to modern society. Equipped with knowledge from both areas, biochemistry is playing an increasingly important part in genetic engineering, producing artificial organs and so forth. Along with this pioneer, chemistry and biology are making significant advancement. Also, it is the same when it comes to geophysics, which has already showed its potential in solving some difficult problems, such as revealing the process of ancient changes to earth and so forth. If a well developed area sticks to its confined field and refused to let other areas step in, this area is unlikely to make any progress.
Kevin的论证思路很完美,提出观点-加2,3句话解释论点-1、2个充分表述的例子-总结陈词。觉得只要你有观点,就没有论证说明不了的问题,而且还说得滴水不漏,句子表达又好。光羡慕的份了。。。。

In sum, without the assistance from other subjects, anthropologists would still be wondering about where human beings came from. Without melding, chemists and biologists would never dream of the contribution they have made to modern society. When one field is bogged, outsiders are likely to have the strength to pull it out.
坚持就是胜利……

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
381
注册时间
2002-10-17
精华
0
帖子
7
板凳
发表于 2007-8-11 14:28:58 |只看该作者
I agree with the speaker's opinion that every scientific area needs outsiders with their knowledge and experience to advance, deeper or wider. Simply, no area of science can progress in vacuum. Valuable knowledge and experience from outsiders can help a field of study to dig deeper as well as grow bigger.

On one hand, if experts of one area want to investigate further, basic knowledge and inspiration from other subjects are indispensable. Specific expertise in one area alone may confine the development of this subject, to some extent. To illustrate this point, a representative case in point is the subject of anthropology. As is known to all, anthropology is processing on basis of subjects such as geology, literature, physics, chemistry and history. To access each step forward in anthropology, it would involve the work of a geologist to discovery bones or belongings of ancient human beings, a physicist along with chemist to analyze the discovered stuff and deduce the exact existing time, a historian to give what was happening in that period of time or even a literature critic to give reference from literature from that period of time. Without all these basic support, anthropology can hardly make any great advancement(例子表述很充分). Another sound example is the famous scientist Nash with his theory of equilibrium. Mathematician as he is, his contribution to economics is beyond compliment. As he states," maths give me inspirations and inspirations lead me to this". No one can deny that besides his individual efforts, the guide and afflatus from maths play an irreplaceable role in the tremendous progress he made in economics. Therefore, outsiders' new ideas and basic knowledge are essential in a scientific area's progressing. Operated in vacuum, a subject is unlikely to get significant achievement or at best reach it extremely slow.


On the other (hand), when one subject step(steps) into another, new subject spring(springs) up which helps each of the original area to develop more comprehensively and vigorously. In the modern scientific field, any subject needs progressing deeper as well as wider. Meld(Medling) with a different subject can bring a wider field of vision and a wholly new branch combined merits of both. Such new branches would make bring about great advancement. We should look no further than biochemistry--subject brings great benefits to modern society. Equipped with knowledge from both areas, biochemistry is playing an increasingly important part in genetic engineering, producing artificial organs and so forth. Along with this pioneer, chemistry and biology are making significant advancement. Also, it is the same when it comes to geophysics, which has already showed its potential in solving some difficult problems, such as revealing the process of ancient changes to earth and so forth. If a well developed area sticks to its confined field and refused to let other areas step in, this area is unlikely to make any progress.
Kevin的论证思路很完美,提出观点-加2,3句话解释论点-1、2个充分表述的例子-总结陈词。觉得只要你有观点,就没有论证说明不了的问题,而且还说得滴水不漏,句子表达又好。光羡慕的份了。。。。

In sum, without the assistance from other subjects, anthropologists would still be wondering about where human beings came from. Without melding, chemists and biologists would never dream of the contribution they have made to modern society. When one field is bogged, outsiders are likely to have the strength to pull it out.
坚持就是胜利……

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
3
寄托币
290
注册时间
2007-6-7
精华
1
帖子
2
地板
发表于 2007-8-12 17:11:13 |只看该作者
我也刚写完issue4,写的自己晕头转向,kevin同学写的好,学习中。

使用道具 举报

RE: issue4 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
issue4
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-718156-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部