Argument33，斑竹，welcome!

feier521UID：109747

33 The following report appeared in an archaeology journal.

"The discovery of distinctively shaped ceramic pots at various prehistoric sites scattered over a wide area has led archaeologists to ask how the pots were spread. Some believe the pot makers migrated to the various sites and carried the pots along with them; others believe the pots were spread by trade and their makers remained in one place. Now, analysis of the bones of prehistoric human skeletons can settle the debate: high levels of a certain metallic element contained in various foods are strongly associated with people who migrated to a new place after childhood. Many of the bones found near the pots at a few sites showed high levels of the metallic element. Therefore, it must be that the pots were spread by migration, not trade."

其中“high levels of a certain metallic element contained in various foods are strongly associated with people who migrated to a new place after childhood.“怎么理解啊？

gteryyUID：114434

某种在各种食物中含量均较高的金属元素与童年后迁徙到其他居处的人关系很大。

史前人类骨骼分析显示：某种在各种食物中含量均较高的金属元素与童年后迁徙到其他居处的人关系很大；在一些瓷片发现地点的骨骼含有这种金属元素；所以瓷片是被人类迁徙时携带散播的。

不迁徙的人体可能也含有这种元素。发现骨骼的地点本身就是a few，证据不足够；且发现的骨头未必就是携带的人；另外，这些骨头也有可能是做陶器生气的人等等。

错误还是比较多的，也是老套的错误。就是理解上有点别扭，毕竟中国人对考古知识的了解不是很普及。

feier521UID：109747

thanks a lot, gteryy

angeikimUID：4857

不熟悉的时候，看到新单词的时候就直接拿他的逻辑关系来攻击。

这些A的逻辑错误还都是比较容易找的。;)

gteryyUID：114434

最初由 feier521 发表
[B]thanks a lot, gteryy [/B]

呵呵，不客气。

当时我做也不理解。相信你是自己思考过的问题。

欢迎这样的提问。

feier521UID：109747

补充：
骨骼和瓷片不一定是同一个时期的。