[经验思考] 纠正一个大家都弄错的地方，关于作文的评分办法 [复制链接]

听了各式各样的录音，也跟其他同学交流过，基本上没有说对的，普遍的说法是两个人评分，看分差，如果小取平均，如果大有第三个人评，还有说有e-rator介入等等。

其实都是错误的，ets的官方说法如下

For the computer-based Analytical Writing section, each essay receives a score from at least one trained reader, using a six-point holistic scale. In holistic scoring, readers are trained to assign scores on the basis of the overall quality of an essay in response to the assigned task. The essay score is then reviewed by e-rater, a computerized program developed by ETS, which is being used to monitor the human reader. If the e-rater evaluation and the human score agree, the human score is used as the final score. If they disagree by a certain amount, a second human score is obtained, and the final score is the average of the two human scores.

也就是说

1、先由一个人来评

2、erator评分

3、比较分差，如果小，取人的评分，如果大，第二个人介入并取两个人的平均分。

附网址

http://www.ets.org/portal/site/ets/menuitem.1488512ecfd5b8849a77b13bc3921509/?vgnextoid=ebd42d3631df4010VgnVCM10000022f95190RCRD&vgnextchannel=54c846f1674f4010VgnVCM10000022f95190RCRD