- 最后登录
- 2021-2-22
- 在线时间
- 4673 小时
- 寄托币
- 12296
- 声望
- 762
- 注册时间
- 2008-10-30
- 阅读权限
- 50
- 帖子
- 907
- 精华
- 4
- 积分
- 6161
- UID
- 2565872
- 声望
- 762
- 寄托币
- 12296
- 注册时间
- 2008-10-30
- 精华
- 4
- 帖子
- 907
|
Successful people would rather try new things and take risks than do things that they've done well already. Agree or not?
Hardly can we estimate since when books like '7 habbits of highly effective people' and 'Secrets of success' went viral (Book titles need to be capitalized, e.g. 'The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People'.). Although not having read one of these best-selling books, I do believe that successful people possess some attributes that single them out. From my perspective, successful people invariably maintain a dynamic passion to innovate and an extraordinary courage to take risks.
The success of Steve Jobs and his cooperation has been long known as a legendary illustraition of how innovation and adventurism are vital to the learders. Notice that despite Microsoft and IBM's domination of the computer industry, Jobs, along with his staff, opened a brand-new area of mobile facilities (This usage of 'facilities' means 'the physical equipment and/or service required to do something', therefore you can talk about things like 'educational facilities', 'postal facilities'. But 'mobile facilities' would be dubious because, well, it doesn't quite make sense to say these 'facilities' are to do 'mobile'. The 'mobile' here doesn't describe the purpose of 'facilities'; rather it describes a property of the 'facilities' themselves, which is not how this '<adj> facilities' phrase is usually used. On top of that, 'facilities' generally mean equipment larger than your typical iPhone, so a real 'mobile' 'facility' is probably something like a technician's van, or Batman's car, or the kind of van used as a base of spy operations in movies, which has all sorts of cool stuff installed..With all that said, you could just use 'devices' or the more posh 'gadgets'.) including the iTouch, iPod, iPad and iPhone, all of which are only compatible with their own operating system, iOS. His audacious experiment proved to be an unprecedented success which not only brings him a great fortune but also changes the consumers' lifestyle. (The question means for you to compare 'new things and risks' with 'things that they already do well'. You have hinted at the first bit by 'audacious experiment', but it wasn't clear at all what was being compared to what in your example. Remember that your readers are not specialists. They probably don't really understand that the new thing here is the limited OS compatibility of Apple's products, which went against the market trend at that time. And I'm not quite seeing what might be the 'thing that Jobs already did well' would be, unless you happen to know he was also one of the pioneers of the personal computer GUI, which foreshadowed 'Microsoft and IBM's domination' to some degree. So what I'm saying is, your example is apparently more about 'successful people try new things and take risks', but not enough 'than doing things they've already done well'. It's not a lethal problem if you continue to cover the 'than' bit, which you did, but it's better if you could point out first that you're now covering the first part of the question so that your readers can see how and to what degree your example is relevant with minimum effort.)
Trying new things and taking risks helps Jobs create a new industry. In some other areas, they expand one's success. Being as a medical student, I find the most successful physicians are not those who rely on their past experiences but those who struggle everyday to find cures for diseases (I don't see how the two types must be different. Surely you can and do rely on your past experiences when trying to find cures for diseases, just as how you may rely on past researches to approach new research questions..yes? What you meant to express here seems to be something more along the line of 'finding novel treatments rather than relying on the same old remedies that are known to work'. Be precise about what you're saying. Think about whether it really reflects the kind of meaning you intend it to.). Because practicing what we have already been accustomed to only prevents us doctors from being a charlatan, an effective new therapy, on the other hand, can cure tens of thousands of patients.(Again, I don't see how this must be the case. The crucial point here you're missing seems to be that either this new therapy you're trying to find cures something that had been incurable with existing methods, or that the new therapy is much much much more effective and cheaper than the existing ones. Otherwise I don't see how existing practices cannot 'cure tens of thousands of patients' while a new therapy must, e.g. your good old aspirin. Once again I must stress on the importance of precision, given that you obviously have a very good grasp on grammar and vocabulary. To use a medical metaphor, you need to make your argument 一针见血.) Chances are our efforts are worth nothing, yet we are responsible to try as saving lives is our cause.(Fair enough, but I don't see how this particular sentence is relevant to your paragraph's topic, which was 'they expand one's success'..)
Sometimes successful people try new ideas or otherwise they will fall behind and lose their success (Now this, is a very awkward expression..). Hidden amid the decay of abandoned factories in Lehigh Vally, is Martin Guitars, a refreshed brand as powerful as Apple to musicians (This seems half complete: '..as powerful to musicians as Apple is to graphic designers'..). To survive a highly competitive market, intelligent handicraftmen ('handicrafts' are the products produced by handicraft-ing, not the people who do handicraft themselves.) carefully added machines to their factory, even though a partially mechanized (Think 'mechanical', not 'machine'.) production line may risk the quality of the acoustic guitar. Now it turns out that the new manufactory strategy works well, helping them to increase their productivity and staying true to the tradition simultaneouslly.
Given what I have discussed, I believe undoubtedly that people would rather try new things and take risks, for that's what makes them successful, enlarges their success and maintains their success.
总结:
于是你可以对新东方的评语说去死去死了。。这还叫句式不丰富难道要写成莎士比亚的英雄双行体不成!你底子很好了好吧。。拼字感觉明显是受发音的影响啊(我个学语音的后遗症),所以建议你不要靠自己听觉/发音印象来拼字哈。另外关于论述方式和语言表达准确的评语都在内文,相信你肯定看得明白就不重复了哈。。
|
|