新G Argument 难题汇总（持续更新）

xmbldtUID：3125827

楼主，是否有新argument的大部分提纲总结？跪求。。

strongbarceUID：161121

ARG 31
The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City's local newspaper.

"In our region of Trillura, the majority of money spent on the schools that most students attend—the city-run public schools—comes from taxes that each city government collects. The region's cities differ, however, in the budgetary priority they give to public education. For example, both as a proportion of its overall tax revenues and in absolute terms, Parson City has recently spent almost twice as much per year as Blue City has for its public schools—even though both cities have about the same number of residents. Clearly, Parson City residents place a higher value on providing a good education in public schools than Blue City residents do."

The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City's local newspaper.

感觉这题中无法反驳Parson City的教育投入是比Blue city多一倍：无论是百分比还是绝对教育投入量都是一倍。唯一的反驳点貌似就是证明更多的教育投入量不一定代表当地居民想要更好的教育。

AndarielbatUID：3011635

80.The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.
"According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fe ...
木多多人 发表于 2011-7-30 10:37

新手的个人拙见：

1.去年SS公司生产的电影是否符合预期观众喜爱的流派？影评高的片子不一定多人看。

2.是否有调整过价格，票价是否超过了观众的接受程度而致使观众变少？
3.是否所有电影去年都遇到了这个问题？如果是因为比如经济问题等原因，就电影质量及宣传度都没什么关系。

shinian1987UID：2797009

18# strongbarce

Parson City has recently spent almost twice as much per year as Blue City has for its public schools
这句话是说P的投入是B的两倍，但是不能说明P的教育投入的百分比是B的教育投入的百分比的两倍。因为两个地方的GDP不一样，可能P的经济发达，B的经济没有那么发达。
经济总量不一样。所以也就不能说明P比B更关心教育。

兔一只UID：3090893

AG2.

Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.

看了前面对2的分析。攻击点差不多了解了。但是对instruction不太理解...不太清楚这个要求要怎么写...- -

ZenazenaUID：2589951

楼主 84题和91题挺难的 百思不得破题知道啊
84 The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine.\n”+
“Two studies of amphibians in Xanadu National Park confirm a significant decline in the numbers of amphibians. In 1975 there were seven species of amphibians in the park, and there were abundant numbers of each species. However, in 2002 only four species of amphibians were observed in the park, and the numbers of each species were drastically reduced. One proposed explanation is that the decline was caused by the introduction of trout into the park’s waters, which began in 1975. (Trout are known to eat amphibian eggs.)\n”+
“Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.”;

91 Three years ago, because of flooding at the Western Palean Wildlife Preserve, 100 lions and 100 western gazelles were moved to the East Palean Preserve, an area that is home to most of the same species that are found in the western preserve, though in larger numbers, and to the astern gazelle, a close relative of the western gazelle. The only difference in climate is that the eastern preserve typically has slightly less rainfall. Unfortunately, after three years in the eastern preserve, the imported western gazelle population has been virtually eliminated. Since the slight reduction in rainfall cannot be the cause of the virtual elimination of western gazelle, their disappearance must have been caused by the larger number of predators in the eastern preserve.

“Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.”;
帮帮忙~~

nothintoloseUID：2993399

21# 兔一只

这个的意思就是对文中给出的一些证据提出其他的解释吧
比如对于firstborn infant monkeys产生更多的cortisol，文中的explanation就是birth order。我们写的时候就可以寻找其他的explanations啦，比如母猴生产时的气温，母猴的年龄，这些因素的不同都有可能导致所生小猴有更多的cortisol

shinian1987UID：2797009

21# 兔一只

这个可以看看我写的关于instruction的帖子：
https://bbs.gter.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1272158&highlight=

花曦racyUID：3127413

83 和91好难~~~恳请帮忙！！

shinian1987UID：2797009

22# Zenazena

84题：
1）首先我们需要明确两次的调查范围是否一样，可能经过这么多年其它几种amphibians迁徙到该公园的其它地方去了，如果调查人员依然在以前的地方调查，是有可能看不到全部的amphibians。也就是说没看到不代表灭绝了，文中并没有说明是在全公园范围内进行的调查。
2）物种数量的减少是有多方面原因的，比如说环境污染，水污染。或者是在自然的竞争下被淘汰，也有可能是下层生物链的断裂，导致那些amphibians无法找到足够的食物，进而导致物种数量的减少。
3）trout会吃amphibian的蛋，这点并不足以说明trout的引进导致物种数量的下降，我们并不知道trout在公园里的数量是多少，如果只是很少一部分，说明对amphibian的生存造不成严重威胁，有可能是其它的生物造成的。

facts: 文中的事实就是amphibian的种类和数量都减少。
我们可以质疑调查的方式，以及造成这种后果的原因。

purplejackUID：3150338

学习了！以前小看argument了啊

hgfrytyUID：3139065

学习了！

ZenazenaUID：2589951

26# shinian1987

楼主很强大~

shinian1987UID：2797009

91题：

https://bbs.gter.net/forum.php?mo ... p;page=1&extra=

多谢版友们的积极参与和分享。