Issue51 Argument147 限时模考

carilynUID：2143911

TOPIC: ISSUE51 - "Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and
interests of each student."
WORDS: 783          TIME: 0:45:00          DATE: 2007-4-17

While I agree with the speaker that "specifically-designed education for each individual" 我觉得还可以说成“special
attention in education” may serve students better than the general education we adopt today, this kind of education may have some potential problems and even "harms undermining"这样说是否成了“对破坏造成了危害”？也就是双重否定变成肯定了，我觉得只取其中一词即可 its feasibility.


I concede that nowadays individualism is becoming more and more vital. People advocate and appreciate special
characteristics and skills distinctive from those of others. The trend applies to both social lives and professional careers. With respect to one's vocation, specialization demands that talents with unique skills and abilities are the most
distinguished ones, especially in such a competitive society like "today"我觉得可以用"the current one "代替，感觉
competitive society和today不是很有可比性。. Every individual is competing with peers all around the world. If one
receives “mere”merely？ general education, it is quite possible that he/she can only reach to？ a mediocre level,
never be an eminent expert. With respect to school education, a specifically designed education is needed to dig out students' potentials, which would otherwise be masked by general education. It is especially so in high school, when where是否更好？students are prepared to choosing their future majors in university. Suppose a student with
distinguished gifts in economics. With only “a few”用limited替代 economics courses in the high school curriculum我觉得用复数更好curricula, "he/she"the student may not discover his/her own gifts. Even if "he/she"the student realizes his/her interests in economics, no opportunnities of exploring more about economics are provided for him/her because
there lacks special是否professional更妥？ courses for those who want to learn more about economics. From the two respects above, I “strongly hold a positive“我觉得这样更好"hold a strongly positive" attitude towards specialized
education which caters to individual needs.

Nevertheless, the concept of specific education has certain potential problems which prevent it from being feasible in a large scale. The problems are mainly embodied in three aspects. First, the technical feasibility of the concept is
highly questionable. How can people devise a curriculum that is suitable to each student in the country? How does a school arrange those courses? How can teachers be able to deal with so many different needs and interests of each individual? As a matter of fact, under today's circumstances of general education, the supply of teachers is becoming less and less, while the demand for them is increasing. So, it's hard to imagine that, for so many students in the
country and so many different needs and interests, the teachers can be capable of catering to all the students.

Secondly, too much emphasis on specific education may make students disregard the importance of general knowledge, therefore undermining是和前面may呼应的吧？如果是的话就应用原型undermine the academic basis of students.
Take high school education as an去掉an example, we encourage students to learn a wide range of basic disciplines, such as mathematics, literature, physics, chemistry, philosophy, to ensure that they absorb adequate knowledge from all different subjects. That guarantees them to have a ”relatively general background“是否generally relative
background to explore their own potentials and develop their own interests. If a student interested in literature is
encouraged to plunge into literature and overlook other subjects from high school, even if "his/her"我觉得一句里面还是不要重复出现his/her，可以用the student's individual interest is satisfied, it is harmful for his/her future development because of lacking of logical and analytical training.     

Finally, specifically-designed education sets up many obstacles in evaluating students. No unified criteria can be created if we adopt such an individualized educational mode. Then, it is quite a thorny problem for our educational
institutions to devise examinations to select talents. How can we compare a student specializing in literature with
another one who studies chemistry? How can we decide which ones are admitted to colleges and universities while
others are not? Some people might argue that we can divide the college entrance examination into several parts,
which respectively cater to different specializations of students. However, it is still too demanding and expensive. Thus it is rather infeasible. The most eclectic and effective way to combine specialization with generalization may be like
today's education mode in which students learn a wide range of general knowledge’s in high school and study major subjects in university. As to developing individual interests and digging out individual potentials in high school, I
recommend that those responsibilities be taken by parents or private tutors. Generally parents know best about their children's needs and they have every motivation to explore their children's potentials. It is far too burdensome and
difficult for our public education institutions to take those responsibilities.   

To sum up, I agree with the speaker insofar as that individual needs and interests of each students student应为单数 should be underscored and valued, but the public general education should remain the way it has been. Because
public education has its inherent limitations, and thus we cannot require too much of it. I advocate that parents
should pay more attention to the individual needs and interests of their children, and family tutoring may be a more effective way to developing students' individual interests.

carilynUID：2143911

奇怪？怎么变成这样了？改的时候还好好的啊:eek: