【草莓酱拌饭组】ISSUE一篇 "求同还是存异？" by StupidSteve

stupidsteveUID: 2704849

9月份写的一篇Issue 这是 本傻某 正式的issue处女写  1.时间没有控制 2.废话巨多无比


原封不动贴上，希望能够更加深刻地意识到自己的思想是多么shallow, 语言是如此pale...

p.s.提纲在最下面



1、"We can usually learn much more from people whose views weshare than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can causestress and inhibit learning."


I concede the speaker’s opinion that to the majority of people, disagreement indeed could cause stress, however, in my point of view, disagreement doesn't inhibit learning and people actually learn much more from those who hold contradictive views than who we share a same one. At the same time, it is the contradictions but not the agreement that contributes the most to the development of mankind.

There are several reasons that I partly agree with the speaker to the opinion that disagreement could and did cause stress in history. It’s a common sense that human is a kind of social but ego-centered animal who thought their own opinions should be the exact right ones thus could hardly get alone with these voices contradict to their own. And people is always looking for security within a group or a team,since the agreement has a function could lead to a feeling of being accepted and supported that it could also bring a certain strong mental security to a single person. While the disagreement’s mental function lies in the scent of a negative atmosphere, shameful or being isolated etc., since disagreement could easily lead to kind of a conflict, in which people was captured by a strong insecurity. For all of the reasons above, disagreement did cause stress. To illustrate: Christian and Islam were both powerful religions who regard each other's believes and principles as opposites, thus caused a strong stress or threatening, rudely reacted as holy wars with Crusades. When facing a different voice, people always tend to play a blind and bad-tempered role automatically and unconsciously, since this used to be an effective method to protect themselves from the stress and threatening caused by disagreements.


However, in my view, disagreement serves a function more than merely in inhibiting learning and people actually learned much more from those whose views we share rather those who hold contradictive ones. Since the main purpose of a contradiction lies in the pursuit of a better explanation or solution to a topic, it becomes essential for them to have a profound understanding of other’s opinion, which might based a totally different observation or analyzing, and figure out the suitable one or combination. While contradictions is an effective process to achieve that purpose, so it won’t be a tough job to realize that actually people learned more from disagreements rather than agreements. One of the most famous scientific debates that people take delight in talking about is the debate between Einstein and Bohr. The debated, endured almost half a century, was based on their academic diversity and has been widely regarded as the greatest urge in physics, since both of the two giants had to analyze deeply the disagreement to develop their own opinion. The debate's enlightening hundreds of young scientists' devoting to the cause of physics also couldn't be easily overlooked.


At the same time, I think it is the contradictions between different voices contributes the most to the development of mankind, especially cognition. One should admit that human’s ability in cognizing is quite localized that we could be possible to understand and explain facts through theories and knowledge which are only suitable within a single period of history or field. As a result, people could hardly find something, especially perfect theories, that is external correct. While it doesn’t mean that we should doubt or stop our process in exploring the un-known but the main purpose of it is not finding or founding an exact solution but the development of human’s cognition, from which a more profound understanding of the universe and human being itself could be available. Since the contradictions between different voices require a sounding and objective mind to analyze and revalue, it should be regarded as an essential access when obtaining a well-developed cognition. On the other hand, it’s a pretty tough job for a person who is satisfied with hearing agreements to march any more. Thus, it is the contradiction caused by disagreements rather than the agreement that contributed the most in human cognition’s development.

To sum up, people actually learned more from the contradictions caused by disagreements than agreement, and what people benefit most from the process of learning is the development of human’s cognition, although, as the price to it, disagreement brings a certain feeling of stress. To urge the growth of cognition, one better learn how to face the stress and analyze the contradiction objectively. Personally, I also would like to hear any voices contradict to this writing, for this might have a tiny contribution to human's development.

提纲如下：

p1:承认 dissagreement 的确会诱发产生 负面心理效应 ，但是，不会阻碍进步。 dissagreement对人类进步的贡献更大，特别在人类的认知能力方面。

p2:dissagreement的确带来负面心理         人类自我意识严重-->潜意识反感disagreement  agreement能够带来安全感，dissagreement引发对立-->对立导致紧张不安-->负面心理 e.g.宗教斗争是宗教自我保护的体现

p3:但是，dissagreement不会阻碍学习         个体观察的角度毕竟有限从而见解不完善-->dissagreement很大程度上是基于不同角度的见解-->对问题有更全面的见解是明显的学习过程-->dissagreement不仅没有阻碍学习，反而提供了机会 e.g.爱因斯坦 玻尔 半世纪学术纷争推动物理事业发展

p4:同时，认为dissagreement对人类发展意义重大          人类认知能力受到条件时代限制-->因此 重要的收获不是结果 而是认知能力的发展-->认知能力的发展需要 深刻地头脑 dissagreement能够锻炼这种深刻分析能力-->dissagreement对认知的发展有意义  人们满足agreements就没有urges去变革进步-->dissagreement的作用大于agreements

p5:总结，转述p1

stupidsteveUID: 2704849

1# stupidsteve
跪...跪求...

stupidsteveUID: 2704849

顶起 up++++