作文存档贴

chiivyUID: 2709743

TPO-4

Nowadays,automobile becomes the most ubiquitous means of transportation throughout the world.People use cars in almost every aspects of life,it is hard to image a society without cars.However, some people doubt that within 20 years,other transportation tools will replace car and car is bound to die out as carriage or horse in 19th century.But personally,I firmly agree this opinion as the following reasons:

First of all,cars emit polluted air and make terrible noises which affects our living conditions seriously.In many metropolises,an increasing number of automobiles contributes to air pollution and noises problems.Many city residents complain their life are influenced by negative effect brought by cars.For example,people live in the houses building alongside the roads,they are bothered by cars' noises almost every minute.They can not have serene environment to relax after working;they can not fall in sleep easily at night;they can not have a peaceful atmosphere to recovery when they are ill.In the view of the seriousness of car problem,some European countries published new policy that people who commutate by subways or buses can get allowance from the government.On the contrary,if they choose cars,they have to pay extra environment-protecting taxes.With the help of this policy,more and more people using cars in the past have turned to other vehicles over this few years.We can predict that in the not-distant future,few people will view automobiles as one of  the main transportation tools,automobiles are bound to die out.

Besides,reducing the amount of cars in the road can relieve the traffic pressure and can dissolve traffic jams.For example,in Beijing,according to a new local regulation,every automobile can only be driven to the road six days a week.This policy was supposed to be conducted only during the 2008 Olympic Games.However,due to its huge success in changing Beginning's traffic situations,for instance, city residents do not have to spend 40 minutes waiting for a bus,and I seldom hear people call their companies to explain they are stuck in the road by traffic jams and can not arrive at companies on time, which used to happen frequently until new regulation was complemented.Some people even claim this traffic regulation made Beijing better than anytime before.Consequently,after 16 days of Olympic Games,many city residents required to continue conducting that policy.Now,this temporary traffic regulation has been fixed and an increasing number of citizens,like me,believe that similar policies will be spread out the country over the few years.That is to say, at that time,much fewer cars will run in the road than today.

In conclusion,in my point of view,there is likelihood that in the not far away future,automobiles will disappear gradually.However,the gradual disappearance of cars will not throw our daily lives into disarray.By contraries,it will better our living conditions and benefit also the ecological system.

chiivyUID: 2709743

TPO-10

考前最后一篇，这篇的听力比其他篇的难啊

The lecture refutes the opinion that presented in the reading,the possible explanation of the declining of the see otter population is environmental pollution or predators’ attack.

The professor starts by illustrating that pollution is weak to kill sea otters.If the the pollution is strong enough to affect the otters,it may probably affect the predators as well.However,according to the reading,the oil rigs and other chemistry pollution is responsible for the sea otters’ deaths.

Furthermore,the professor points out that human hunting contributes to the death of sea otters.Because hunting changes many sea animals’ diets, especially some small animals,like sea lions and seals.But in the passage,other predators may hunt more prey than before.

Finally,professor objects that standpoint that other factors create the concentration of pollutants along the coast,as the reading.Professor demonstrates that the location for the sea otters must be accessible.The place like shallow or rock location precisely is not affected by the declining possibility.

All in all,the professor in the lecture holds an negative opinion to the writer of the passage.

chiivyUID: 2709743

TPO-10

考前最后一稿

Topic：Playing games is a waste of time.Children should not be allowed to play computer games.Agree or disagree.


Nowadays,there is a general debate over the phenomenon of children playing computer games.Those who object that argue that playing computer games is kind of wasting time and children should spend their precious time on studying.However,people who advocate it,on the other hand,claim that it is OK for children to play computer games.But for me,I support the former for the following reasons:

The majority of Computer games are not designed for children only,so if children,unfortunately,play such games,that may exert negative effects on their growth.For example,in the Internet,we can download everything we want without any steps to check our personal information.That makes easy for children to download some games that might contains “adult only” contents,such as violence,blooding scene or even pornography.Those are forbidden contents for children to touch outside the computer games,and many parents and their peers are trying hard to keep their children away from those things.If we allow children to play computer games,not only will that exert negative effects on children,but also devastate parents and their peers’ efforts of giving a healthy environment for children to grow up.

In addition,playing computer game is time consuming process,if a child gets addicted to it,that might occupy his too much time which is supposed to be used for other things,like studying,spending time with parents,or playing with their friends.For example,my little brother,who is 11-year old,has been found of computer games when he was only 9 –year old.Before he got in touch with computer games,he usually played mafia or cheese with me or other family members.
And every weekends,he used to go out with his classmates for football or tennis.However,things totally changed at the moment he was addicted to computer games.He did not attend our mafia,or go out with classmates at the weekends any more,he put all his concentration on computer.Every time I pass his bedroom,the only thing I can see is that he is staring at the computer screen.I always hope that one day he feels tried or boring about playing computer games,then he will come back to us and our Maria.However,so far as I know,there is no a sign of his coming back.Playing computer game,I dare to say,is ruining him,and his life.

All in all, I firmly believe that children should not be allowed to play computer games.That is not a good way to give them a healthy environment for growth and not a wise choice for spending their free time.

mpromanusUID: 2565872

Nowadays,there is a general debate over the phenomenon of children playing computer games.Those who object that argue that playing computer games is kind of wasting time and children should spend their precious time studying. However,people who advocate it,on the other hand, claim that it is OK (Generally speaking, casual acronyms sometimes appear too casual in formal writings. You can use 'okay'. But this is just a personal preference and is not a must.) for children to play computer games (and their major reason would be? If you just stop at repeating the question's topic sentence, you won't be able to add much meaningful weight to the discussion. Be more specific. Be more insightful.). But for me,I support the former for the following reasons:

The majority of Computer games are not designed for children only (I'm wondering why you used 'only'. If something is not for children 'only', then it's probably for both children and adults. You could just stop at 'games are not designed for children', and it'll be perfectly clear that they are not for children. Not at all, period.), so if children, unfortunately, play such games, that (What?) may exert negative effects on their growth. For example, on the Internet,we can download everything we want without any steps to check? (Who does this 'check'? The person who's downloading stuff?) our personal information. That makes it easy for children to download some games that might contains “adult only” contents, such as violence, bloody scenes or even pornography. Those are forbidden contents for children to touch outside the computer games?, and many parents and their peers are trying hard to keep their children away from those things. If we allow children to play computer games, not only will that exert negative effects on children, but also devastate parents and their peers’ efforts of giving a healthy environment for children to grow up. (This is interestingly skewed logic. Now, you say that the adult only stuff is 'outside computer games', and if children are still free to use the Internet to download anything, how does 'not allowing children to play computer games' help you to make sure children are not exposed to the adult only stuff? Do you mean children are only exposed to the adult only stuff through computer games? Did you say it? Is this kind of silent assumption even valid?)

In addition, playing computer game is a time consuming process, if a child gets addicted to it, that might occupy his too much of his time which is supposed to be used for other things, like studying, spending time with parents,or playing with their friends. (This is a run-on starting from 'if'.) For example, my little brother, who is 11-year old, has been found of computer games when he was only 9 –year old. Before he got in touch with computer games, he usually played mafia (Mafia - if you mean what I think you mean - is a complicated game. Usually it won't be played with children that young.) or cheese (I humbly admit that I know of no such game..=.=) with me or other family members. And every weekends, he used to go out with his classmates for football or tennis. However,things totally changed at the moment he was addicted to computer games ('fond' of computer games doesn't mean he's necessarily 'addicted' to them. These are totally different ideas.). He did not attend our mafia, or go out with classmates at the on weekends any more, he put all his concentration on the computer (This is a run-on starting at the last 'he'.). Every time I pass his bedroom, the only thing I can see is that he is staring at the computer screen. I always hope that one day he feels tried or boring about playing computer games, then he will come back to us and our Maria?. However, so far as I know, there is no a sign of him coming back. Playing computer games,I dare to say, is ruining him,and his life. (How could you say that without evidence that he's not doing as well as before? He might become an award-winning electronic gamer and so rich that you would envy him one day. Don't rely on your moral values to make conclusions. Your little brother is no longer doing what he used to do, yes, but whether this is good or bad depends on whether what he's doing now really makes him better or worse. Your conclusion, on the other hand, depends on your assumption that playing computer games is intrinsically worse than playing Mafia or tennis. You can of couse argue that computer games is time consuming and all that - but which activity isn't, and why playing Mafia must be better than playing computer games? Think about it.)

All in all, I firmly believe that children should not be allowed to play computer games. That is not a good way to give them a healthy environment for growth and not a wise choice for spending their free time.

总结：

语法和词汇没有太大问题，请注意拼写和分句。

逻辑 - 论证的做法和句子之间的逻辑发展你已经掌握得比较好了，但是第一个分论点的推演有问题：互联网上可以下载到有成人内容的游戏，成人内容对小孩不好 -> 游戏对小孩不好，不能玩，这是错误的三段论。。第二个分论点的前提有问题：玩游戏会让小孩不去做其它事情 - 你在这里有一个假设，就是那些 其它事情 是好的，应该做的，而玩游戏是绝对不好的，没好处的。这并不是很有力的假设，而且你也没有说明这个假设，所以你的逻辑推演不出很有说服力的结论。。