寄托天下
查看: 3216|回复: 6

[求助] 请教TPO3 L3 第14题(sec1) [复制链接]

Rank: 1

声望
15
寄托币
99
注册时间
2008-4-20
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2010-8-16 09:40:20 |显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 fairypp 于 2010-8-16 09:59 编辑

遇到问题了,官方答案是D,可是没找到确切滴线索,总归不太安心
额先写出自己滴想法,请教哪位达人能给出更好的解释

题目:
According to the professor, how did Painleve’s film confuse the audience?
*   They show animals out of their natural habitat
*   They depict animals as having both human and animal characteristics
*   The narration is scientific and difficult to understand
*   The audiences of the 1920s and 1930s were not used to films shot underwater
---
偶自己滴分析:
听力部分有关线索:
第三段最后confusing,science and fiction
第五段最后He confused his audience in the way he portrayed the animals he filmed mixing up on notions of the categories of humans and animals
貌似根据这些都找不出本题目答案。

后用排除法
A,B为细节;C,未提及;所以只好选D
第四段第三句:
Painleve was a pioneer in underwater film-making貌似也能给D选项一些理由
---
请教达人...

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
1070
寄托币
28954
注册时间
2009-11-27
精华
4
帖子
668

荣誉版主 寄托与我 Sagittarius射手座 Golden Apple

发表于 2010-8-16 11:22:13 |显示全部楼层
John
Well, maybe I shouldn’t be asking this, but if Painlevé’s films are so special, so good, why haven’t we ever heard of them? I mean, everyone’s heard of Jacques Cousteau.

Professor
Well, that’s a fair question. Uh, the short answer is that Painlevé’s style just never caught on with the general public. I mean, it probably goes back at least in part to what we mentioned earlier that people didn’t know what to make of his films – they were confused by them, whereas Cousteau’s documentaries were very straightforward, met people’s expectations more than Painlevé’s films did. But your true film history buffs know about him, and Painlevé is still highly respected in many circles.

个人理解答案在红色标记的地方,为什么大家confuse,因为那时候还没有P这种风格的电影,P的风格不能吸引大家,大家都不知道电影在演什么
博观而约取,厚积而薄发

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

声望
15
寄托币
99
注册时间
2008-4-20
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2010-8-16 12:27:35 |显示全部楼层
恩~
多谢狐狸童鞋

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
1070
寄托币
28954
注册时间
2009-11-27
精华
4
帖子
668

荣誉版主 寄托与我 Sagittarius射手座 Golden Apple

发表于 2010-8-16 12:37:12 |显示全部楼层
不客气啊
博观而约取,厚积而薄发

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
347
注册时间
2009-8-22
精华
0
帖子
10
发表于 2010-8-16 12:56:09 |显示全部楼层
我觉得选B,理由:
He confused his audience in the way he portrayed the animals he filmed, mixing up on notions of the categories - humans and animals
大家说说看法吧。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
1
寄托币
177
注册时间
2008-10-22
精华
0
帖子
11
发表于 2010-8-18 16:33:47 |显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 开若兰 于 2010-8-18 16:35 编辑

5# SilentScorpius

同意 SilentScorpius 的意见。我认为 D 选项不正确的原因是,当有学生提到:But underwater film-making wasn't that unusual, was it? 虽然 professor 回答:Well, actually, it was pretty rare at that time. 当这并不能足够支持 D 选项,断言是因为这个原因 audience was confused。因为 D 选项的意思是说,在那个年代,还没有关于拍摄水下的电影,而这与在后面提到的 Jacques Cousteau 也拍摄水下电影相冲突。

而支持 B 选项的内容则相当明显,professor 说:He confused his audience in the way he portrayed the animals he filmed mixing up on notions of the categories of humans and animals.

14. According to the professor, how did Painleve’s film confuse the audience?
A. They show animals out of their natural habitat
B. They depict animals as having both human and animal characteristics
C. The narration is scientific and difficult to understand
D. The audiences of the 1920s and 1930s were not used to films shot underwater

did ... confuse - confused
the audience - his audience
depict - portrayed
both - mixing up
human and animal - humans and animals
the categories - characteristics

完美的同义替换。
In front of ture love, every human being is equal.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
163
注册时间
2009-1-12
精华
0
帖子
7
发表于 2010-8-28 18:59:32 |显示全部楼层
好像是选B~~有个TPO的答案更正~可以在GTER上搜一下~
我也是做到这道题觉得奇怪~
TOEFL IS JUST A GAME.

使用道具 举报

RE: 请教TPO3 L3 第14题(sec1) [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
请教TPO3 L3 第14题(sec1)
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1139814-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部