寄托天下
查看: 2342|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[LSAT] PT60 3/20 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
5
寄托币
664
注册时间
2010-6-6
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-10-6 00:59:56 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
Principle: One should criticize the works or actions of another person only if the criticism will not seriously harm the person criticized and one does so in the hope or expectation of benefiting someone other than oneself.

Application: Jarrett should not have criticized Ostertage's essay in front of the class, since the defects in it were so obvious that pointing them out benefited no one.

Which one of the following, if true, justifies the above application of the principle?

A. Jarrett knew that the defects in the essay were so obvious that pointing them out would benefit no one.(OA)

E. Jarrett did not expect the criticism to be to Ostertag's benefit.
=====
This one likes an assumption question. I picked E. I thought Ostertage would not know the defects.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
531
寄托币
10024
注册时间
2008-12-27
精华
4
帖子
290

Aries白羊座 荣誉版主 律政先锋

沙发
发表于 2010-10-6 05:16:12 |只看该作者
题干:
someone other than oneself。
---------------------------
someone 可以是 任何人。
像E,只排除一人,是不行的。
Pride only hurts, it never helps.
It will shock you how much it never happened.
卧薪尝胆,闭关修炼
http://www.tudou.com/programs/view/WPbU1dsnBN8/

使用道具 举报

RE: PT60 3/20 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
PT60 3/20
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1165105-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部