寄托天下
查看: 1819|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[优秀习作] Issue152 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
1054
注册时间
2003-8-27
精华
2
帖子
1
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2003-9-3 21:50:24 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
152"The only responsibility of corporate executives, provided they stay within the law, is to make as much money as possible for their companies." ----7

Response:

Is the sole responsibility of corporate excutives to make as much money as possible for the companies within the law? The speaker claims so, but I disagree this statement partially. Although one of the accountability of the head of one company is to make profits for the whole corporation, he or she should take the interests of society, the mass for more consideration.

As a threshold matter, we must concede that making a lot of of profits is of great importance and significance for not only the companies themselves, but also the society. It is natural and reasonable that the executives are to maximize the value of shareholders, and magnify the salary or welfare of employees, so that the executives can own more abundant economic benefits, and the staff in companies would appreciate the goodness from employers, stimulating their impetus to make efforts for the task, as well as the shareholders, given increasingly profits and bonus, are willing to invest on the companies to broaden their range and size in business, which is a benign circle for the development of this companies. Furthermore, for society, if a corporation of great profits, it means more opportunities of employment and more pay for national tax; also, such cases of successful elites can encourage the spirit of enterprise and fair competition, which can largely promote more individuals to take their potential into full play, transforming to the contributions for the whole nation.

Nonetheless, the assertion that making money as much as possible within the law seems reasonable at first glance, however, as a matter or fact, I consider it precious, for there are always a lag between practical problems and improper behaviors to be corrected and the enactment of the related law. For instance, a country lack sufficient development and modernization, which the government is worried about the bread- and -butter problem, may have no energy and efforts to take other less pressing matters, such as environmental pollution, deforestation, into account, resulting in a blank in these aspects in the national law. Consequently, it is ostensibly legal for a company in an industrialized nation to dump rubbish into the sea of the poor one, and to make new-drug trials in human bodies in some undeveloped countries. Therefore, provided the behaviors of some firms stay in the law, in fact, they harms the interest of human life and endanger the system of morality standard.

As a result, it is unfairly to say the only purpose is to make profits for companies, even if they are legal, and the managers should concentrate on whether their companies have brought about the benefits for society, which is a breeding ground for their long-term development. They may put emphasis on the image of the companies, forming the singular, but healthy or vigorous culture in corporation; the mass obviously does not prefer to a company in greedy and venality. A apt illustration to underscore this issue is McDonald's, the famous worldwide fast food chains; in my city, when raining, McDonald's always prepare lots of free " umbrellas of love" for the public, which greatly helps individuals in trouble, gaining the respect and praise from the mass, and ensuring their ulterior market.

In sum, if the head of one company pays attention only to the profits, even if within the law, that is not equal to proper behaviors within the range of morality and ethic. To making money is justifiable, however, it is not the sole purpose for a manager: those who consider more of the welfare of the whole society and the populace will benefit from the goodness and interests in the long run.

谢谢指教
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 16Rank: 16Rank: 16Rank: 16

声望
6
寄托币
55070
注册时间
2001-9-3
精华
211
帖子
415

Aries白羊座 荣誉版主

沙发
发表于 2003-9-4 09:49:40 |只看该作者
you write fluently and clearly.

however,  the problem is, you states why companies should not aim at profits only, but you don't differentiate between a "company" and an "executive". What you argue is all about the company, so it will be better if you connect the role of a company with what an executive should do. Should the manager take up the both responsibility of making money and keeping an eye on the social benefits? Is it possible?  How can they do that? .....

And, would you please correct others' essays as possible? This is a mutually beneficial BBS and i believe you will learn something from doing so.
UA
我说人生哪,如果赏过一回痛哭淋漓的风景,写一篇杜鹃啼血的文章,与一个赏心悦目的人错肩,也就够了。不要收藏美、钤印美,让美随风而逝。生命最清醉的时候,是将万里长江视为一匹白绢,裂帛。(简桢)

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
1054
注册时间
2003-8-27
精华
2
帖子
1
板凳
发表于 2003-9-5 14:38:29 |只看该作者
I appreciate your suggestion greatly, and it's you that had corrected my esssays twice.
There is only five days left for me, and I hope I can contribute our BBS as much as possible and we all attain success.
Thanks a lot!

使用道具 举报

RE: Issue152 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Issue152
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-135510-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部