【每日写作】 发帖只为督促自己(欢迎狠批)

xp_scorpioUID：2773581

秋雨荆州 发表于 2012-10-17 15:17
楼主好认真！感觉写得也挺不错的

28号就要考了，作文都是瞎写的，版主见笑了哈

秋雨荆州UID：2903781

真的还不错:lol

xp_scorpioUID：2773581

TPO16
The lecturer talked about a guideline changed the archaeology status in nineteenth century, it has improved three areas of problems. What she said is quite distinct from what is stated in the passage.

First, there must be an examination before every project. The researchers must examine all the construction site before the projects can start so that they can find whether there are any acheological interests or values. If there are something valueable, all the government and business company will get together and decide how to preserve these artifacts. They could excavate properly and then allow the project to proceed.

Moreover, it is mentioned in the lecture that archeologists will be paid by the construction company. The company should pay every examination, and therefore the source of financial supports is never so adequate. A great range of sites will be examined so this directly contradicts the theory in the passage.

Finally, the passage says people have difficulty finding a job in archeology. On the contrary, archeologists are more paid for their work because of the guideline. Many of them are hired in archeology, from professors who do the scientific research to people who process the data. This policy increased the interests of having a job in archeology, thus the job opportunity is the highest ever been.



Since we are having a better living standard than before, many people can afford to have travels from time to time. Therefore the job as a tour guide has attracted a great interests among many young people especially college students. Because they have a better knowledge in the tourist sites so many people think it would be easier if they are led by a tour guide. However I tend to disagree with this statement and here is why.

Personally I believe it would have much more fun if we do the research about where we want to go. When doing all the digging on our own, we can find where our interests are and where we do not want to go. This is because tour guide must always meet everybody's interests in a group, so tour guide may only introduce what he or she thinks is the most interesting place to us. Besides tour guide may skip the backgroud history of some places because he or she does not know exactly the information. We need to get rid of everything stressful in our lives but not wander around some different places we do not remember anything after our visiting.

Some people would argue that tour guides are professional so that they can take us to the most popular place and give us a better feeling about the travel. But sometimes, tour guides may have a plan with the bus driver and then they bring us to somewhere to shopping. It is a quite normal pheonomenon in some coutries. They tell us there are something good and also not expensive near the tourist sites and they persuade us to buy some so that they can get bonus from the shopping centers. It is quite uncomfortable for us to visit these places because we just want to relax and have a good time enjoying the beautiful views. In some extreme situations, more time are spent on these shopping centers than the exact tourist sites we should go.

In a word, I would definetly agree that the best way to travel is not in a group led by a tour guide but on our own. The reason for this is simple, we can have a better control of time by ourselves which means we can decide how much time we need to spend on one place and easily control our routes. Also we can spare the distraction from some boring shopping places and spend all of our time on places we are interested in.


TPO17
The lecturer did not believe that there would be fewer and fewer birds. What she said is quite distinct from what is stated in the passage, she thought the claim was unconvincing.

First, it is mentioned in the passage that birds' natural habitats may continue to disappear with the settlements, but the leacturer said it actually provided a better and larger place for birds to live. Some people even complained the increase of population of birds in city. Some birds will decrease other birds may increase. Those birds like pigeon are easy to see in city so that their predators like halk are also more common to see.

Moreover, even though the lecturer admited agricultural activities will grow, the situation is not the way like in the passage. The truth is there are fewer land converted to agricultural use every year because people continue to design new crops which are quite productive. More food per unit land will achieve so there is no need to destroy natural land.

Finally, the lecturer said people would never let the history projected into future. Since we are aware of the possible consequence of using pesticides, two methods are taken to deal with this problem. One is that some less toxic pesticides are developed for agricultural use. Another one is that scientisists will try to grow more pest resisted crops so that pests will not be attracted and declined chemical pesticides. Therefore it would not harm birds at all and this directly contradicts the passage.




In the present day, a great number of company have realized that advertisement is such an important way to promote the sales of their products that it has attracted so many interests. They all want to design an advertisement to persuade as many people to buy as possible. However, some advertisements may somehow exaggerated the feature or the actual use of the products.

Personally I believe that many advertising or marketing major students have learned a lot about how we think when we were shopping. For example, we may prefer the food which is more colorful and beautiful or we may feel reluctant to buy something bad looking. Therefore they can focus on designing their products more appealing than their competitors'. But whether the products are well-looking or not is not related to their qualities, maybe something added into the products made us enjoying eating but also had harmful effect on ourselves. The products seem to be more fanciful to us but they are actually not good for us.

Some people would argue that companies just want to have a larger market share so that they made the advertisements more interesting, so it is natural for them to make the products seem much better. Nevertheless, we can not overlook that we should be responsible for what we had done. We should make a better product but not working on how to make the advertisement more persuasive. Some advertisements even invited many celebreties to make products seem better than they really are. The celebreties have the money and tell customers something even themselves do not understand or believe.

In a word, I whole heartedly agree that products seem much better than they really are because of the advertisement, and I think it is not right to do so. After all we should notice that once our customers are tired of those unreliable advertisements on TV or radio and so on, they may never buy our products any more. What we should do is to improve our products' quality to attract more people to buy and to tell the exact difference between our products and others', thus customers will believe our products and the advertisement can be successful.

TPO18

综合写作莫名其妙没了。。。伤心。。。。

With the development of society, much more schools have been built around all over the world so that every students have the opportunity to achieve knowledge in school. Besides more people dedicate their careers in education, they not only impart knowledge but also teach us how to be an adult,so students can be easily influenced by their teachers. However I tend to believe that students are more influenced by their friends and here is why.

Personally I believe that students have more in common with their friends than teachers. The reason for this is simple, because they are at a almost same age and what they face in daily is also similar, therefore they have more topics to talk about with friends than teachers. For example, if teachers tell us not to play video games after school but all of our friends want to play, it should be easy to understand that we may neglect what our teachers said and play video games anyway. Some teachers may tell us what is interesting in our lives and our friends have something else to prefer, we are also likely to have interests in those children's things.

Some people would argue that teachers are better educated so they have a better understanding of young people's lives. It is true that teachers have this kind of authority, but it is unlikely that students will listen. This is because students almost spend most of their time with friends even more than with their parents and teachers, they have lessons together, have meals together and also play together. In this process, students can not always remember what teachers told them and they may unconsciously be affected by their surroundings. After all, environment can be the most effective way to change a person, everyone may be changed by someone else without noticing. If everybody around us sings a song, we may gradually have the subconsciousness and love this song.

In a word, I do not agree with the statement that students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Students are young and they have not developed their own ability to view this world. So even their teachers give them the right way to go, they may not follow this direction because their friends can change them. It is who students spend most of time with has the most influence on them.

xp_scorpioUID：2773581

TPO16
The lecturer talked about a guideline changed the archaeology status in nineteenth century, it has improved three areas of problems. What she said is quite distinct from what is stated in the passage.

First, there must be an examination before every project. The researchers must examine all the construction site before the projects can start so that they can find whether there are any acheological interests or values. If there are something valueable, all the government and business company will get together and decide how to preserve these artifacts. They could excavate properly and then allow the project to proceed.

Moreover, it is mentioned in the lecture that archeologists will be paid by the construction company. The company should pay every examination, and therefore the source of financial supports is never so adequate. A great range of sites will be examined so this directly contradicts the theory in the passage.

Finally, the passage says people have difficulty finding a job in archeology. On the contrary, archeologists are more paid for their work because of the guideline. Many of them are hired in archeology, from professors who do the scientific research to people who process the data. This policy increased the interests of having a job in archeology, thus the job opportunity is the highest ever been.


Since we are having a better living standard than before, many people can afford to have travels from time to time. Therefore the job as a tour guide has attracted a great interests among many young people especially college students. Because they have a better knowledge in the tourist sites so many people think it would be easier if they are led by a tour guide. However I tend to disagree with this statement and here is why.

Personally I believe it would have much more fun if we do the research about where we want to go. When doing all the digging on our own, we can find where our interests are and where we do not want to go. This is because tour guide must always meet everybody's interests in a group, so tour guide may only introduce what he or she thinks is the most interesting place to us. Besides tour guide may skip the backgroud history of some places because he or she does not know exactly the information. We need to get rid of everything stressful in our lives but not wander around some different places we do not remember anything after our visiting.

Some people would argue that tour guides are professional so that they can take us to the most popular place and give us a better feeling about the travel. But sometimes, tour guides may have a plan with the bus driver and then they bring us to somewhere to shopping. It is a quite normal pheonomenon in some coutries. They tell us there are something good and also not expensive near the tourist sites and they persuade us to buy some so that they can get bonus from the shopping centers. It is quite uncomfortable for us to visit these places because we just want to relax and have a good time enjoying the beautiful views. In some extreme situations, more time are spent on these shopping centers than the exact tourist sites we should go.

In a word, I would definetly agree that the best way to travel is not in a group led by a tour guide but on our own. The reason for this is simple, we can have a better control of time by ourselves which means we can decide how much time we need to spend on one place and easily control our routes. Also we can spare the distraction from some boring shopping places and spend all of our time on places we are interested in.

xp_scorpioUID：2773581

TPO17


The lecturer did not believe that there would be fewer and fewer birds. What she said is quite distinct from what is stated in the passage, she thought the claim was unconvincing.

First, it is mentioned in the passage that birds' natural habitats may continue to disappear with the settlements, but the leacturer said it actually provided a better and larger place for birds to live. Some people even complained the increase of population of birds in city. Some birds will decrease other birds may increase. Those birds like pigeon are easy to see in city so that their predators like halk are also more common to see.

Moreover, even though the lecturer admited agricultural activities will grow, the situation is not the way like in the passage. The truth is there are fewer land converted to agricultural use every year because people continue to design new crops which are quite productive. More food per unit land will achieve so there is no need to destroy natural land.

Finally, the lecturer said people would never let the history projected into future. Since we are aware of the possible consequence of using pesticides, two methods are taken to deal with this problem. One is that some less toxic pesticides are developed for agricultural use. Another one is that scientisists will try to grow more pest resisted crops so that pests will not be attracted and declined chemical pesticides. Therefore it would not harm birds at all and this directly contradicts the passage.



In the present day, a great number of company have realized that advertisement is such an important way to promote the sales of their products that it has attracted so many interests. They all want to design an advertisement to persuade as many people to buy as possible. However, some advertisements may somehow exaggerated the feature or the actual use of the products.

Personally I believe that many advertising or marketing major students have learned a lot about how we think when we were shopping. For example, we may prefer the food which is more colorful and beautiful or we may feel reluctant to buy something bad looking. Therefore they can focus on designing their products more appealing than their competitors'. But whether the products are well-looking or not is not related to their qualities, maybe something added into the products made us enjoying eating but also had harmful effect on ourselves. The products seem to be more fanciful to us but they are actually not good for us.

Some people would argue that companies just want to have a larger market share so that they made the advertisements more interesting, so it is natural for them to make the products seem much better. Nevertheless, we can not overlook that we should be responsible for what we had done. We should make a better product but not working on how to make the advertisement more persuasive. Some advertisements even invited many celebreties to make products seem better than they really are. The celebreties have the money and tell customers something even themselves do not understand or believe.

In a word, I whole heartedly agree that products seem much better than they really are because of the advertisement, and I think it is not right to do so. After all we should notice that once our customers are tired of those unreliable advertisements on TV or radio and so on, they may never buy our products any more. What we should do is to improve our products' quality to attract more people to buy and to tell the exact difference between our products and others', thus customers will believe our products and the advertisement can be successful.

秋雨荆州UID：2903781

抱歉啦，晚上作文被系统吃了，给你找回来了:)

xp_scorpioUID：2773581

TPO18 补N天前

综合写作莫名没了。。。

With the development of society, much more schools have been built around all over the world so that every students have the opportunity to achieve knowledge in school. Besides more people dedicate their careers in education, they not only impart knowledge but also teach us how to be an adult,so students can be easily influenced by their teachers. However I tend to believe that students are more influenced by their friends and here is why.

Personally I believe that students have more in common with their friends than teachers. The reason for this is simple, because they are at a almost same age and what they face in daily is also similar, therefore they have more topics to talk about with friends than teachers. For example, if teachers tell us not to play video games after school but all of our friends want to play, it should be easy to understand that we may neglect what our teachers said and play video games anyway. Some teachers may tell us what is interesting in our lives and our friends have something else to prefer, we are also likely to have interests in those children's things.

Some people would argue that teachers are better educated so they have a better understanding of young people's lives. It is true that teachers have this kind of authority, but it is unlikely that students will listen. This is because students almost spend most of their time with friends even more than with their parents and teachers, they have lessons together, have meals together and also play together. In this process, students can not always remember what teachers told them and they may unconsciously be affected by their surroundings. After all, environment can be the most effective way to change a person, everyone may be changed by someone else without noticing. If everybody around us sings a song, we may gradually have the subconsciousness and love this song.

In a word, I do not agree with the statement that students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Students are young and they have not developed their own ability to view this world. So even their teachers give them the right way to go, they may not follow this direction because their friends can change them. It is who students spend most of time with has the most influence on them.

xp_scorpioUID：2773581

TPO19  继续补

The lecturer had a maketing major and he thought there are some wrong impression on buzzing. What he said is quite distinct from what is stated in the passage, he did not think buzzing is misleading.

First, it is not true that buzzers may mislead consumers by giving an incorrect information. This is because after using the product and thinking it is good, the buzzers may then made a phone call to consumers. They just get every truth from buzzers. This directly contradicts what is said in the passage.

Moreover, it is mentioned in the passage that consumers would ntot be suspicious of what they heard because they do not know they are being lobbied. On the contrary, they asked a lot of questions about the products. They may want to know the price, service and how long buzzers had used the products. So if buzzers are not able to answer these questions, consumers would not buy products from buzzer.

Finally, the lecturer felt it is stupid to think buzzing would harm the social relationship.  If the product was bad, company may not hired buzzers to promote sales. He believed consumers would love the products when trying to use them. Therefore buzzing made people feel more trustful to open to people.






In the present day, there are many resources if we want to get informations such as TV, radio, Internet and the list will go on. But people may actually use one of them as their major resource, for example aged people may just watch TV, young people at school may not have a radio so they can just get information on the Internet. Therefore I totall agree that a person must have many different news resources and here is why.

Personally I believe that we can not get all the information we want from a single resource. Let us take TV for instance, we all know that news program has limited covering of what happened in the world. Time duration of news program is always half an hour in my country, so TV can not give us every details about the event thus we just look at it from one aspect. If we want to know the whole story, we may buy a book to have a better understanding of backgroud knowledge or we even can talk to the people involved in the event. So different news resource can make us know the overall story but not just one aspect.

Some people would argue that since Internet has developed to a such higher degree so that we can almost get everything from it and they think there is no need to waste time searching from other resources. However, I have a question about this statement. How can we possibly know whether we get the right idea? This is because most of us  can have an access to the Internet, maybe someone not quite qualified would give his or her limited knowledge about some questions. In some severer situations, people may spread some wrong information to achieve their hidden purpose. Politicians may disgrace their competitors in order to have a better politic career, companies may spread the information that their competitors' products have some healthy problem so consumers would believe and increase sales of their own ones. It is not enough if we only trust one single resource.

In a word, different news resources will give us both a whole and a much more trustful information. Because we can not see an event by our own eyes, we may need to get every aspects of it in order to b well-informed. We can see that our world is full of news, sometime lies, so we really need to know a lot more before we draw the conclusion.

xp_scorpioUID：2773581

秋雨荆州 发表于 2012-10-24 00:32
抱歉啦，晚上作文被系统吃了，给你找回来了

哦哦哦  我想当时怎么回复都没反应呢:handshake

xp_scorpioUID：2773581

TPO20

The lecturer talked about three aspects towards the "let it burn" policy, what she said is quite distinct from what is stated in the passage. She thought forests fires are a natural part of cycle, and also bring creativities to forests.

First, new plants can grow by taking the advantage of fires. While the passage says many Yellowstone's land had been damaged, the lecturer focused on the positive aspect. She said that fires had gave more diversity to the forest and more opportunity for plants. The fire just created the condition for some small plants to thrive otherwise they could not grow.

Second, the wildlife actually recovered. This is because after being incinerated, the area is suitable for small animals such as rabbits to live. Therefore, predators who depend on those small animals can also find food so that the wild animal diversity is ,on the contrary, much stronger. This directly contradicts the theory in the passage that both habitats and food for wildlife are destructed.

Third, it would not be a problem about the local economy. The lecturer indicated  that the concequence of fire had a massive effct on many aspects. Low rainfall can make the park dry so they could not tell whether it was the fire. Also the lecturer mentioned people did come to Yellowstone park for travel next year of the fire, and they came back each year after that. Thus there is no need to worry about the economical situation like the way in the passage.








As we can see, there are many people who are really successful in the world. Today we may heard that somebody makes a great number of money, tomorrow another lucky person becomes the CEO of a famous company. On the one hand our society has created so many opportunity to be success, but on the other hand those successful people do have their own advantage over most of us. This is because they are willing to take the risk and try something new.

Personally I believe that higher risk will bring us more payback. It is easy to understand that someone who could grab the one in a life time chance will have a better opportunity to success. For example, when Steve Jobs was the CEO of Apple, he wanted his product to be the best in the world. So there must be some desicions which can be a double-edge sword, people may feel amazing about the new product or they would not buy because of the high prize or even unreasonable designs. Many mobile phone company such as Nokia and Sumsung, they have already "defined" what is a phone and what we can do with a phone. However, Steve did not compromise and he gave us a new defination about a phone, it can be smart and also make our lives much easier. All of these should contribute to the spirit of Steve because he could do something different and be willing to face the possible failure.

Somebody would argue that people who can do what they know can also success. But I tend to agree that if we all do the exact same thing to be good, we can not be success, it is just ordinary. Everyone know how to do well because we can always refer to other successful people. We can just copy their ideas of running company or managing people so we basiclly do not have anything belong to us. It is quite important if we can be innovative and do something that never done before. And risk is the one that can help us achieve this goal, because we can never know what the public will react to our daring actions. They may find it is great and also they can totally hate what we have done. So we just need to do it and check out whether it will success, we can design something that is absolutely out of mind and does not have any actual uses, but maybe customers will like it and be crazy about it.

In a word, new things will always give us something we had never seen before. We may have a broader horizon to this world so that we can think about how can we do something amazing and surpass everyone else. It is not enough just knowing some fundamentals about how to do well, we should have the guts to do something crazy, something people do not dare to do.