issue152 做企业的就是要赚钱！第一篇，请大家给点意见，谢谢

小狗圆圆UID: 155823

152. The only responsibility of executives, provided they stay within the law, is to make as much money as possible for their companies.

I generally agree with the speaker in asserting the profit maximization, which is determined by the social roles and functions the enterprises performed.

The first aim of enterprise is profit maximization, and to be the leader of the company, executives’ most essential responsibility is to leader his men achieve this goal, which is quite pragmatic. The world itself is pragmatic, since Darwin’s theory of evolutionary selection holds that the survival or extinction of each organism is determined by its ability to adapt to the environment, and beings as humans, we are not exempt from this procedure. We are obligated to be pragmatic, to survive and further to thrive.  When we apply this phenomenon to the realm of economy, enterprises are cultivated by the principles of market as we are by the environment, where profit is the key to survive.  Let us get down to the role shared by executives, if we regard the company as a whole an organism, executives should be compared to the center of the nerve system.  As we know, what makes a man to survive is his hand, and what makes thrive is his head.  By the same token, to ensure a considerable profit as well as the development of the company, depends not only every of its employees but also a good leadership, to guide it.  And executives are ones who assume this accountability.  As it stands, attaining profit is the golden rules for an executive as his part as leader and for the sake of enterprise.

In the second place, it is the profitability of company where lies its social responsibilities. When we judge a company, we tend to be influenced by our instinctive biases, which make the conclusion unfair.  We tend to overemphasize the detrimental part and ignore the benefits it brings.  This phenomenon can be explained by the public’s savor of media.  Few of preeminent deeds done by the government is as appealing as the scandals which hold our eyes.  Similarly, when we come to the social obligations of companies, we tend to be critical.  Rivers are fouled by the paper factories, or one company wallows up another causing a series of disemployments, as we may concern.  On the contrary, we simply ignore what they do in facilitating our daily lives. Phones, automobiles, computers, even clothes and papers, all of them are derived form no where but factories.  Moreover, it is the company who produces a lot of changes of employment, whether these chances are more or less than those of disemployment. In a sense, the duty of company actually lies in its effort to manufacture its product and ensuring its own existence, and both are based on the premise of profitability.

While some may argue that companies are the profiteers of the society and communities, thus they are obliged to assume some moral responsibilities to reward the society.  This allegation sounds reasonable, but it’s quite irrational.  In the first place, what determines the interest of a company is not a society but a free market conducted by the consumers.  In this observation, the company should try its best to cater to the consumers, not the society anyway.  After all they are two quite different conceptions.  And then, if large sums of money are power to social profit projects, what left ensure the survival of the company itself and that of its employees?  Will another tragedy of disemployment happens?  Thirdly, granted that the enterprise own a great deal to the society, it has been made up for by the tax it pays.  It is the business of government to make use of these sums of money and to relocate it among the society, in the form of SSN (Social Security Number) for instance. Consequently, without balancing the responsibilities of companies and societies, we cannot mix them together and attribute them all to the former.  Additionally, even if a donation is actually conducted by a company, in my view it is simply for the sake of the company itself to gain a fame or popularity, which in turn to ensure it profit.

As it stands, profit is the foundation of a company to survive, and where its social responsibilities lie.  Other moral obligations of companies should be realized in other ways but for companies.  To be the leader of the corporation, executives are just the one who leads the companies to a profitable prospect.

虽然以前也写过篇，但是滥的连我自己都不忍心看，^_^! 总算认认真真的写过改过一篇文章，想听听大家的意见！

观点：同意，executives 的任务就是Make money，这是由公司的社会角色决定的
1.利润是生存之本。一方面，我们的世界是Pragmatic的，达尔文的进化论说的，生存是第一位的；另一方面，Executive是公司的大脑，他不领导公司牟取利益，谁干呀？
2.如果一个公司它是盈利的，那么它在某种意义上就已经实现了它的社会责任了。人们意识不到这一点是天生的偏见。公司生产的产品，提供的就业机会不都是在执行它的社会职责嘛。而这些职能的根本就是要有利润。
3.有人说利润是来自社会的，所以就要回报社会。这个结论缺乏理性。一，利润的来源是市场是消费者，消费者和社会是两个概念。二，把钱都给别人了，公司的员工怎么办。三，公司不是交税了嘛，政府不就是用这个来实现资源重新配置，间接的实现公司的social responsibility吗？最后，就是有donation，那也是for the sake of itself.

sigh,自己看自己的东西怎么看都好，就是明知道也用argument的精神——只要说话就是有问题的来安慰自己，所以真的想听听大家怎么想的，谢谢^_^！！

paisleyUID: 64183

总的思路是好的，但是感觉语言表达上功力还欠缺一点，读起来不是太舒服。当然不影响表意，但是如果能改进 词汇的使用则更佳。

我想这三层意思是不是多了点，我估计你没法在45分钟内写完，尽量限时作文，训练自己在有限的时间里把意思表达完毕而清楚。

建议你看看精华区的范文，分析他们是怎么说理的。还有这篇文章里讲的思路，非常值得学习。https://bbs.gter.net/showthre ... =%BD%CC%C2%DF%BC%AD


你这篇文章，类似的和相关的文章可能有许多前人写过，或者还有范文。你可以搜索一下，对照一下这些文章。 或参照该帖：《在本版找前人作文的方法》http://211.151.90.54/bbs/showthr ... hlight=%CC%E2%BA%C5


希望你也能多多修改其他朋友的文章。尤其是提点结构上和想法上的建议。因为你不可能每个题目都练过来啊，看别人的题目，自己脑子过一遍,既可以给别人提建议，自己又多了一次训练的机会.为别人服务的人优先得到斑竹的修改哦！

小狗圆圆UID: 155823

谢谢paisley，

我也觉得自己不会说理，恩要好好练练！
谢谢建议，我去看看，其实再写之前也看了，别人写的，但是轮到自己，就～～～，还是嫩呀！

我其实也挺想帮别人改的，但是我也是新手上路，说实话，别人的merit我还不能体会，好的，我看看能为大家做点什么，嘿嘿，但愿不要误人子弟，哼唧！！

我十九号就考了，不知道还来不来的及，最后的冲刺要注意什么那？求教

paisleyUID: 64183

就多注意语法点什么的，把还没练过的ISSUE列列提纲，都熟悉熟悉