14 年秋季提纲互改小组-issue 74

max940623UID: 3559548

老师求改:lol
KW: past, make decisions, today

V1
TS: Generally speaking, understanding about history could assists the mankind to compare the present and predict the future, therefore history always acts as an important reference for human to make decisions. Admittedly, in some fields the short history fails to enlighten us. But in most cases, history is long enough for normal people to grasp and utilize the universal rule behind. In fact, except decision-making, learning history could contribute more to the society.

ts1 反面的情况 历史过短
In certain fields like smartphone industry, the history could be useless or even harmful for the decision-making. 举例，诺基亚身为曾经的手机业霸主，基于对短暂历史的认知，放弃塞班系统后选择了错误的平台WP，输给苹果与安卓。
However, the similar situation occurs because the limited history in this field suggest the short-term experience instead of the universal rule behind. 因为历史不够长，一段时间内的随机性经验不构成普遍规律不能应用到任何时间，所以参照历史不具备价值

ts2 历史足够长
On the contrary, the short-term uncertainty mentioned above will be eliminated when a long history is assessable. In this sense, people could extract the theorem that could apply at any time from history. 举例，就用大家都喜欢的奥观海参考罗斯福新政救市吧，因为市场经济的参照历史长，能揭示凯恩斯主义这一正确且适用于任何年代的定理

ts3历史的其他作用
Besides decision making, history could also support the human to conduct self-orientation and transposition consideration. 历史除了揭示规律，还能让人学会自我定位和换位思考。

这题本来想写成ts1和ts2是论述参考历史对凡人做决定的作用（不能改变历史规律的统称凡人）
Ts3写那些颠覆历史的伟人也应该在决定前先参考之前的历史。举例贝多芬创建浪漫派其实也吸收了很多古典派的精华
但是操作难度有点大。。。不知道老师您觉得那种好一些

max940623UID: 3559548

老师求改...自我觉得这篇没有您之前说的我列提纲多而不精，而且主旨句主题句对应不好的毛病了。
但是始终感觉这三个论点中前两个经不起argue也很难说清楚，第三个有点发散但是有偏题的嫌疑。。。
KW: past, make decisions, today

V1
TS: Generally speaking, understanding about history could assists the mankind to compare the present and predict the future, therefore history always acts as an important reference for human to make decisions. Admittedly, in some fields the short history fails to enlighten us. But in most cases, history is long enough for normal people to grasp and utilize the universal rule behind. In fact, except decision-making, learning history could contribute more to the society.

ts1 反面的情况 历史过短
In certain fields like smartphone industry, the history could be useless or even harmful for the decision-making. 举例，诺基亚身为曾经的手机业霸主，基于对短暂历史的认知，放弃塞班系统后选择了错误的平台WP，输给苹果与安卓。
However, the similar situation occurs because the limited history in this field suggest the short-term experience instead of the universal rule behind. 因为历史不够长，一段时间内的随机性经验不构成普遍规律不能应用到任何时间，所以参照历史不具备价值

ts2 历史足够长
On the contrary, the short-term uncertainty mentioned above will be eliminated when a long history is assessable. In this sense, people could extract the theorem that could apply at any time from history. 举例，就用大家都喜欢的奥观海参考罗斯福新政救市吧，因为市场经济的参照历史长，能揭示凯恩斯主义这一正确且适用于任何年代的定理

ts3历史的其他作用
Besides decision making, history could also support the human to conduct self-orientation and transposition consideration. 历史除了揭示规律，还能让人学会自我定位和换位思考。

这题本来想写成ts1和ts2是论述参考历史对凡人做决定的作用（不能改变历史规律的统称凡人）
Ts3写那些颠覆历史的伟人也应该在决定前先参考之前的历史。举例贝多芬创建浪漫派其实也吸收了很多古典派的精华
但是操作难度有点大。。。不知道老师您觉得那种好一些