综合作文求改~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

szh6615UID: 3647882

TPO14

The reading passage proposes three main benefits that salvage logging could bring. The lecturer, however, points to the inaccuracies in each of the reason and states that the action can make longer term damage.

To begin with, the reading passage claims that removing dead trees can expand space for living trees. On the other hand, the professor argues that it will disturb the nature process of wood decomposition. This action will lead to a lack of nutrients in the soil which is harmful to future tree generation.

Second, the reading passage states that salvage logging will reduce the damage caused by harmful insects like spruce bark beetle. On the contrary, the professor contends that spruce bark beetle has been living in the forest for hundreds of years without causing damages. Besides, the removing of trees can make some birds and other beneficial insects leaving too.

Moreover, the writer asserts that the salvage logging is beneficial for economy. However, the professor points out that the economic benefits are small and do not last long. The action needs helicopters and other expansive vehicles to transport the woods. In the meantime, this job requires experienced and skilled workers rather than local people.

In the final analysis, the professor convincingly shows that none of the explanation in the reading passage provides sufficient support for the statement that the salvage logging could bring benefits.

szh6615UID: 3647882

求改，求不沉

08--UID: 3525385

你这篇TPO我没写过，但是水平跟我刚开始备考时差不多，考试时应该是Fair，拿不到Good。
建议你看一下这篇帖子里面的楼主写的范文，跟你自己的文章对比下，你就能发现差距。
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1389824-1-1.html
祝早日分手

szh6615UID: 3647882

08-- 发表于 2015-12-1 22:56
你这篇TPO我没写过，但是水平跟我刚开始备考时差不多，考试时应该是Fair，拿不到Good。
建议你看一下这篇帖 ...

多谢！！