Writers are necessarily ambivalent about any kind of recognition—honors, prizes, simple praise—because they are ambivalent about their relationship to the present. The first audience that a writer wants to please is the past—the dead writers who led him to want to write in the first place. Forced to admit that this is impossible, he displaces his hope onto the future, the posterity whose judgment he will never know. That leaves the present as the only audible judge of his work; but the present is made up of precisely the people whom the writer cannot live among, which is why he subtracts himself from the actual world in order to deposit a version of himself in his writing. The approbation of the living is thus meaningful to a writer only insofar as he can convince himself that it is a proxy for the approbation of the past or the future—insofar as it becomes metaphorical.
因为信息不全,只能看个大概。貌似是说:一个作家想要在他生存的那个时代,创作出新的作品(the first place)。现在(present)的人只能看到他留下的作品。(就是以前的作家想取得后人的赞同)。他把自己从他生活的那个时代剥离出来,(subtracts himself from the actual world)就是为了达到这个目的。 哈哈 不是大神,抛砖引玉。 我看你在论坛问了好多问题,都是好有水平的问题。希望共同学习探讨。
huang4900 发表于 2019-3-25 10:56
因为信息不全,只能看个大概。貌似是说:一个作家想要在他生存的那个时代,创作出新的作品(the first plac ...
这道题的问题是这个:
The author of the passage believes that writers are ambivalent to recognition because it is
A. rarely commensurate to the way in which posterity will regard a writer’s work
B. only of consequence in the future, yet an author will never know what the future thinks of his or her work
C. typically bestowed in the present, whereas a writer is more concerned with approbation from the past and the future
D. unfairly meted out to those who possess only a modicum of talent
E. mostly unrelated to the quality of a writer’s prose
选C
谢谢解答~~ 还不是很懂最后一句"The approbation of the living is thus meaningful to a writer only insofar as he can convince himself that it is a proxy for the approbation of the past or the future-insofar as it becomes metaphorical."