ISSUE108 高频题 有改必回请留链接

忧郁天使UID: 200539

108."In many countries it is now possible to turn on the television and view government at work. Watching these proceedings can help people understand the issues that affect their lives. The more kinds of government proceedings - trials, debates, meetings, etc. - that are televised, the more society will benefit."
提纲：电视转播政府程序是否有好处取决于该程序是否需要保密，观众是否关心该程序，转播该程序是否会干扰政府工作，这三点各写一段

The presence of televised government proceedings can naturally benefit the society, where the people are able to watch their elected government officials in action. But to broadly state that society will gain more benefit through more kinds of televised government proceedings is to ignore its negatives. The necessity of a government proceeding to be televised is going to vary greatly depending on whether the government proceeding is easily be disturbed by public, whether it is important to the society, as well as whether there is an absolute requirement for secrecy in such a proceeding.

Regarding the requirement for secrecy, some government proceedings call for the desire to be heard by as few people as possible or completely unknown to the public. Some information, especially those concerning the security of the nation and may have potential possibility to leads the jeopardize situations, should be withhold by the government in order to maintain the order of the entire society. For example, if the government’s strategy to thwart deliberate plans of the international terrorist or a drug trafficker has been disclosed before it has been acted, no useful purposes can be achieve ultimately. For these proceedings, televising them to public is not so much a benefit to society as a threat to the national safety.

Another variable is the importance of a given governmental proceeding to the public. Will a government proceeding be paid much attention to if it is to be televised? To the extent that the performance of a TV program is associated with its popularity in the audience, obviously televising a government proceeding to TV screen may be more or less beneficial with respect to the society, depending on how the public concern about it. There is a television channel in England that broadcasts Congressional proceedings every day, but few people watch it. Only when some big issues comes up for a debate or for a vote does a significant number of people turn in. The benefit thus will vary for each televised government proceeding depending on the degree to which the public regard it.

Finally, whether televising a government proceeding is good or bad will depend on whether these proceedings are easily disturbed. Do the government officials become accustomed to the cameras? From a pure efficiency standpoint, the presence or absence of the reporters can make all the difference whether a government proceeding can be achieved effectively and efficiently. Some government proceedings which need to be done as quickly as possible or should be done tranquil ambience can prove be to unsuitability to be televised.

In summary, it is impossible for every government proceedings to be televised on TV. There are many government proceedings call for a separable condition from the public. A government proceeding being televised to public can have their positive or negative influence depending on the property of such a proceeding. Televising government proceedings that belong to a certain kind do indeed benefit the society with the way of making a bridge between the government and the public population. But to broadly state that the more kinds of government proceedings that are televised, the more society will benefit is to overstate the distinct possibility that, given some special kinds of government proceedings, more benefit will be gained from more televising such proceedings.

忧郁天使UID: 200539

期待砖头。。。。互改啊

忧郁天使UID: 200539

up

bcomerUID: 182621

:) revising^^

bcomerUID: 182621

The presence of televised government proceedings can naturally benefit the society, where the people are able to watch their elected government officials in action. But to broadly state that society will gain more benefit (benefits) through more kinds of televised government proceedings is to ignore its negatives. The necessity of a government proceeding to be televised is going to vary greatly depending on whether the government proceeding is easily be disturbed by public, whether it is important to the society, as well as whether there is an absolute requirement for secrecy in such a proceeding.

Regarding the requirement for secrecy, some government proceedings call for the desire to be heard by as few people as possible or completely unknown to the public. Some information, especially those concerning the security of the nation and may have potential possibility to leads the jeopardize situations (^^这个话有点……，觉得不是很好), should be withhold by the government in order to maintain the order of the entire society. For example, if the government’s strategy to thwart deliberate plans of the international terrorist or a drug trafficker has been disclosed before it has been acted, no useful purposes can be achieve ultimately. For these proceedings, televising them to public is not so much a benefit to society as (asyet?) a threat to the national safety.

Another variable is the importance of a given governmental proceeding to the public. Will a government proceeding be paid much attention to if it is to be televised? To the extent that the performance of a TV program is associated with its popularity in the audience, obviously televising a government proceeding to TV screen may be more or less beneficial with respect to the society, depending on how the public concern about it. There is a television channel in England that broadcasts Congressional proceedings every day, but few people watch it. Only when some big issues comes (come?) up for a debate or for a vote does a significant number of people turn in. The benefit thus will vary for each televised government proceeding depending on the degree to which the public regard it.

Finally, whether televising a government proceeding is good or bad will depend on whether these proceedings are easily disturbed. Do the government officials become accustomed to the cameras? From a pure efficiency (efficient?) standpoint, the presence or absence of the reporters can make all the difference whether a government proceeding can be achieved effectively and efficiently. Some government proceedings which need to be done as quickly as possible or should be done tranquil ambience can prove be to unsuitability to be televised.

In summary, it is impossible for every government proceedings to be televised on TV. There are many government proceedings call for a separable condition from the public. A government proceeding being televised to public can have their positive or negative influence depending on the property of such a proceeding. Televising government proceedings that belong to a certain kind do indeed benefit the society with the way of making a bridge between the government and the public population. But to broadly state that the more kinds of government proceedings that are televised, the more society will benefit is to overstate the distinct possibility that, given some special kinds of government proceedings, more benefit will be gained from more televising such proceedings.

…… 最后一句话中有4个MORE，似乎不是很好

……你要是没有时间就不要回改了since我似乎没改什么，更象是学习了一篇文章，觉得写的挺好的：）

忧郁天使UID: 200539

多谢了啊，晚上做完实验回来看你的
一起努力