- 最后登录
- 2013-3-19
- 在线时间
- 131 小时
- 寄托币
- 1521
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-1-12
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 4
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 1225
- UID
- 192045

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 1521
- 注册时间
- 2005-1-12
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 4
|
感觉第四段有点偏离论点。你这篇文章的论点是“In my view, villages and towns may also need the financial support from the government in order to survive.”,可第四段却在讨论是否支持应该根据实际情况。而且全文中关于论点的论述只有第二段,显得太单薄了点。
帮忙看看我的Issue 10,谢谢!
Most people agree that a nation must preserve its cultural traditions, but when it comes to how to maintain cultural traditions people have different ideas: some advocate governments should give financial support to their major cities; some argues that government should pay more attention to rural areas. I stand for the second view that governments should ensure their rural areas receive the financial support to thrive so that traditional cultures can be preserved.
Unlike cities rural areas preserve many traditions, because outside force exert much weaker power on changing traditions in rural areas than in major cities. Major cities are frontier of a nation and hence they are greatly influenced by outsiders. Under such circumstance, if the power of the cultural traditions cannot overweigh the outside forces, they are very likely to vanish. For example, Shanghai, a Chinese coastal city, which western cultures influence a lot, has lost many Chinese cultural traditions like ceremonies for harvest and behaves like a western city. In contrast, foreign cultures change rural areas very little, because they are far away from outside world. Consequently, many traditions are preserved very well there. For instance, Chinese village communities have a great deal of traditions which have almost disappeared in Chinese major cities, such as special rituals for ancestor-worship, ancient languages, and augury. Therefore, rural areas, because of their rich sources of cultural traditions, deserve support from governments.
Moreover, rural areas are generally poorer than urban areas. Many facts in the world tell that while the overall economy is developing, the economic gap between rural areas and urban areas is being widened. As a result, a large number of people in rural areas often have no choice but to work in major cities in order to earn a living. When they work in cities, their minds will inevitably be influenced by urban cultures that are different from traditions. They will be very likely to embrace urban ideas and discard traditional mores, if traditions contradict new ideology. In this way, once they come back to their villages, they will be iconoclast against cultural traditions. The case in point is Chinese immigrant workers who move to work in cities and return to their homes in rural areas in Chinese New Year. Under their affects, rural areas in China begin to lose some traditions like very complex traditional weddings, Chinese New Year ceremonies, and traditional funerals. If the trend cannot be inverted in near future, it is very possible that Chinese cultural traditions would be at stake. Thus governments need to lend financial support to rural areas so that they can thrive without suffering economic impacts accompanied with cultural influences from major cities.
Admittedly, government should also be concerned with major cities' role in preserving a nation's traditions. Cultural traditions in major cities confront with great challenges from foreign cultures, so to preserve them requires governments’ support; otherwise major cities would be homogenized. For example, in order to perpetuate traditions, Chinese government provides funds for Peking Opera in Beijing, which is the second largest city in China.
In sum, in order to maintain traditional cultures, governments should ensure that their rural areas receive financial support they need to thrive, although their major cities also play an important role in this hard task. |
|