08年发表的一篇文章：详细的做了美国PHD Econ Program的排名，非常专业

snaillsUID: 2196722

感谢lz分享~不过感觉这个排名还是很玄啊,stanford计量和数理还是很强的,才排18,minnesota顶尖的宏观和发展都没有进前10...

agfhUID: 2578489

LZ辛苦，好贴。但看到这个排名就知道肯定有人质疑，的确很多地方很奇怪，但排名这东西嘛也就是一参考，别太较真。毕竟选校排名也只是一部分而已，如果是phd一读就是5，6年，这么多年phd life啊，肯定还得综合考虑。

promising~UID: 2569086

有没有附件上传一下?

barrett_zhaoUID: 2325264

感觉这排名不怎么make sense
salant 发表于 2009-2-3 12:20

同上，可能对刚开始申请的人有帮助，但是到了后面，似乎什么排名都没多大意义了。

graciehaoUID: 2400213

好贴必顶！！！

bravedreamjiUID: 2183808

农经的很离谱 居然没有Maryland和Michigan State。 不过还是感谢LZ的劳动！

bravedreamjiUID: 2183808

农经的很离谱 居然没有Maryland和Michigan State。 不过还是感谢LZ的劳动！

cckantUID: 2247822

排名方法里，论文质量的权重用的是SSCI的影响因子。但用这个因子得到的经济学期刊排名会很奇怪，背离行内人对期刊影响力的印象很多。

个人觉得这个排名不是很可靠，芝加哥怎么可能才仅仅挤近前十。

srorangeUID: 2394002

升起来

ironsxuUID: 2779571

惊见当年偶当年选校的启蒙文章，顶一个。
送附件。

isakuUID: 2211745

排名方法里，论文质量的权重用的是SSCI的影响因子。但用这个因子得到的经济学期刊排名会很奇怪，背离行内人对期刊影响力的印象很多。
cckant 发表于 2009-2-5 18:04

“ The final step was assigning a quality index, [Q.sub.j], to eachjournal. We used both the impact factors published in the 2004 SocialScience Citation Index (SSCI scores) and rankings based on"citations per character in 1990" for articles publishedbetween 1985 and 1989 (JEL scores) proposed by Laband and Piette (1994).(7) Many publications contained at least one or both an SSCI and a JELscore. There were 107 journals containing both an SSCI and a JEL score.There were an additional 131 with only an SSCI score and an additional16 with only a JEL score. Thus, the total number of journals indexed inthe SSCI that we used in our analysis was 238, and the total number ofjournals indexed in the JEL that we used in our analysis was 123.Publications that had neither an SSCI nor a JEL score were dropped fromthe analysis. It should be noted that although the SSCI indexes 172journals in the economics discipline, we use all publications identifiedby Econlit and indexed in the SSCI, even if outside the economicsdiscipline, in calculating productivity.”

这是关键！！

不过这篇文章的优点是：数据很新，而且有field ranking