issue4 好久没写了....大家来给看看....要回拍的留连接哦

foreveraUID：202035

4, "No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."

1.        把某一基础学科知识介绍到应用性学科中,更能促进应用学科发展.
2.        某2个学科融合能产生一些新兴学科.
3.        把太枯燥的基础学科应用到应用学科中,能够促进基础学科知识的普及.
4.        全面的人才需要更广泛的素质.

      Can any field of study advance significantly without outside knowledge and experience? Facing this complicated question, any extreme response would be improper. As far as I am concerned, except for some certain special fields, most of science researches and studies are correlated, and, of course, they advance significantly with new knowledge form other subjects.   

      First of all, introducing studying methods and theories to related fields of study does contribute to the both fields. Taking economics for instance, after mathematical theories and studying methods joining in, modern economics advances greatly. For the commonplace math and economics share-economy need precise data, while math’s function is dealing with variety of data, mathematical ideology can assist in the economic researches fluently. Economists can draw conclusions depending on no long vague numbers but accuracy. Also, learning mathematical deducing manners, economists succeed in forecasting reasonable economic activities. In other words, human can control world economy with new theories based on formal economic experience and math studying ways at will. Consequently, it’s far more advanced than before the fusion of diverse subjects.

       What’s more, the cooperation of two different scientific fields not only can advance one of them rapidly, but also can engender some boundary subjects, such as biochemistry , geophysics, and so on. In the highly modernization and globalized world, natural and social problem are so complicated that can’t not be dealt with only a few research fields. With each field working out its related part of the right problem, the final conclusions are made. Actually, if the problems are typified, new subjects, which are mixture of correlative fields, are great in need. For example, after Watson and Clirk found the structure of DNA, many new problems, especially those of ultrastructure, need to be studied with more chemistry knowledge, then biochemistry comes into being. Accordingly, there is no doubt that modern technology will be much benefited from these new fields.

       Additionally, a wider spectrum of knowledge will bring scientific researchers acute thinking and intelligent brain. Karl Marx, one of the greatest ideologists, often played piano or did math problems to prevent his brain from being ossifying. Similarly, Francis Bacon once said  and  I paraphrase ” Histories make men wise; poems witty; the mathematics subtle; natural philosophy deep; moral grave; logic and rhetoric able to contend.” Therefore, a successful individual is a master in one specialized field, but not layman in other subjects.

       Last but not least, the fusion of varies fields can also help to spread some highly theorized disciplines, in the example I presented in paragraph 2, the use of math disciplines in practical economic activities does make it easier for the learners to obtain intricate knowledge.  

      To sum up, modern science does seek nutrition from the fusion of diverse fields of study, and it does also need numerous subjects penetrating into each other.

[ Last edited by staralways on 2005-8-6 at 19:07 ]

neo_athrunUID：2111270

Can any field of study advance significantly without outside knowledge and experience? Facing this complicated question, any extreme response would be improper. As far as I am concerned, except for some certain special fields, most of science researches and studies are correlated, and, of course, they advance significantly with new knowledge form(from) other subjects.   

      First of all, introducing studying methods and theories to related fields of study does contribute to the both fields. Taking economics for instance, after mathematical theories and studying methods joining in, modern economics advances greatly. For the commonplace(这里用的不对吧？应该是表示共同点的词吧？) math and economics share-economy(ecnomics) needs precise data, while math’s function is dealing with variety of data, mathematical ideology can assist in the economic researches fluently. Economists can draw conclusions depending on no long vague numbers but accuracy. Also, learning mathematical deducing manners, economists succeed in forecasting reasonable economic activities. In other words, human can control world economy with new theories based on formal economic experience and math studying ways at will. Consequently, it’s far more advanced than before the fusion of diverse subjects. (例子举的很经典，不过论证演绎得句子就显得少了，还是应该多说几句理，另外段尾最后一句可以好好对应一下前面)
       What’s more, the cooperation of two different scientific fields not only can advance one of them rapidly, but also can engender some boundary subjects, such as biochemistry , geophysics, and so on. In the highly modernization(modernized这样与后面的globalized对应) and globalized world, natural and social problems are so complicated that they can’t not be dealt with only a few research fields. With each field working out its related part of the right problem, the final conclusions are made. Actually, if the problems are typified, new subjects, which are mixture of correlative fields, are great in need. For example, after Watson and Clirk found the structure of DNA, many new problems, especially those of ultrastructure, need to be studied with more chemistry knowledge, then biochemistry comes into being. Accordingly, there is no doubt that modern technology will be much benefited from these new fields.

       Additionally, a wider spectrum of knowledge will bring scientific researchers acute thinking and intelligent brain. Karl Marx, one of the greatest ideologists, often played piano or did math problems to prevent his brain from being ossifying. Similarly, Francis Bacon once said  and  I paraphrase ” Histories make men wise; poems witty; the mathematics subtle; natural philosophy deep; moral grave; logic and rhetoric able to contend.” Therefore, a successful individual is a master in one specialized field, but not layman in other subjects.(这一段在我看来有跑题之嫌啊，作者是要论述学科的相关性而这里主要讲的是人才要全面，这两者之间的逻辑关系有些模糊让人摸不到头脑了，即使存在逻辑关系也比较的远吧)

       Last but not least, the fusion of varies(various) fields can also help to spread some highly theorized disciplines, in the example I presented in paragraph 2, the use of math disciplines in practical economic activities does make it easier for the learners to obtain intricate knowledge. (这一段思路挺独到的，不错不错，我是没想到呵呵)  
      To sum up, modern science does seek nutrition from the fusion of diverse fields of study, and it does also need numerous subjects penetrating into each other.(概括的笼统了吧，其实可以把上面几段的观点paraphrase再复述一遍，也可以对应了稳中的结构)
总的来说思路很好，有的我都没想到过，特别是第一段的例子很经典，可惜的就是第三段的论述有跑题之嫌。 我当初写这篇的时候，还找了一个论述的角度：学科的融合不一定要局外人的参与，也可以由本学科内部的专家自行来进行研究（比如牛顿研究万有引力时引入的微积分）。
语言方面逻辑连接词用得很合适，不过长句子闪亮句子方面应该还有提升空间：）
以上都是个人观点，仅供参考呵呵