argument2 076G myth 小组第一次作业-sarning

sarningUID: 2215285

Argu 2
The following appeared in a letter sent by a committee of homeowners from the Deerhaven Acres to all homeowners in Deerhaven Acres.

“Seven years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community’s yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average property values have tripled in Brookville. In order to raise property values in Deerhaven Acres, we should adopt our own set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting.”

syllabus:
1, Firstly, no evidence is stated in the argument to support the assumption that average property values have tripled in Brookville because of adopting a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting.
2, Secondly, the arguer fails to point out whether Deerhaven Acres is suitable to adopt a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting like Brookville does.
3, Finally, even if restrictions on landscaping and housepainting could cause drastic increase of property in Brookville, the arguer fails to provides substantial evidence to justify that these restrictions would have the same effects in Deerhaven Acres either.


In this argument, the arguer recommends that all homeowners in Deerhaven Acres should adopt a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting in order to raise average property values. To support his conclusion the arguer cites the example of Brookville where average property values have tripled after there homeowners adopted a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting. As it stands, the argument suffers from several critical flaws as follows.

Firstly, no evidence is stated in the argument to support the assumption that average property values have tripled in Brookville because of adopting a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting. There have many other factors that would contribute to the increase of average property values. Perhaps it is rapidly developing industries or services that bring economic prosperity to Brookville. Perhaps seven years ago, Brookville begin to develop tourism or other profitable professions and achieve success during this period. Also perhaps abundant mineral resources have been found in Brookville and thus a tide of investment appears.

Secondly, the arguer fails to point out whether Deerhaven Acres is suitable to adopt a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting like Brookville does. Maybe in Deerhave Acres there are many high buildings and no yards, and so it is diffcult to find a effective way to constitute certain restrictions. But in Brookville majority of buildings are little wood houses with yard and thus it is very appropriate for Brookville to adopt a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting.

Finally, even if restrictions on landscapig and housepainting could cause drastic increase of property in Brookville, the arguer fails to provide substantial evidence to justify that these restrictions would have the same effects in Deerhaven Acres either. Some definitely differences between these two places should be taken into account. It is completely possible that wonderful surrounding and harmonious landscaping and colors of homes attract rich men to move to Brookville committee so that real estate continuously rise. Meanwhile, because of bad location or lack of fresh air in Deerhaven Acres nobody would willingly move to this community in spite of how unified this community's
yards' landscaping is and how harmonious its homes' colors are.

In sum, the argument lack credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to the arguer's recommendation. To make the argument more convincing, the arguer must provides compelling evidence that in Brookville these restrictions do cause the increase of average property values and the situations of Deerhaven Acres now is similar with it of Brookville seven years ago.

杏林有情天UID: 2247728

In this argument, the arguer recommends that all homeowners in Deerhaven Acres should adopt a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting in order to raise average property values. To support his conclusion the arguer cites the example of Brookville where average property values have tripled after there homeowners adopted a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting. As it stands, the argument suffers from several critical flaws as follows.

开头很简洁，概括性挺强，需要向你学习。

Firstly, no evidence is stated in the argument to support the assumption that average property values have tripled in Brookville because of adopting a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting. There have many other factors that would contribute to the increase of average property values. Perhaps it is rapidly developing industries or services that bring economic prosperity to Brookville.

可以考虑用bring about economic prosperity of Brookville.

Perhaps seven years ago, Brookville begin to develop tourism or other profitable professions and achieve success during this period. Also perhaps abundant mineral resources have been found in Brookville and thus a tide of investment appears.

Secondly, the arguer fails to point out whether Deerhaven Acres is suitable to adopt a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting like Brookville does. Maybe in Deerhave Acres there are many high buildings and no yards, and so it is difficult to find a effective way to constitute certain restrictions. But in Brookville majority of buildings are little wood houses with yard and thus it is very appropriate for Brookville to adopt a set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting.

Finally, even if restrictions on landscapig and housepainting could cause drastic increase of property in Brookville, the arguer fails to provide substantial evidence to justify that these restrictions would have the same effects in Deerhaven Acres either. Some definitely differences between these two places should be taken into account. It is completely possible that wonderful surrounding and harmonious landscaping and colors of homes attract rich men to move to Brookville committee so that real estate continuously rise. Meanwhile, because of bad location or lack of fresh air in Deerhaven Acres nobody would willingly move to this community in spite of how unified this community's yards' landscaping is and how harmonious its homes' colors are.

In sum, the argument lack credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to the arguer's recommendation. To make the argument more convincing, the arguer must provides compelling evidence that in Brookville these restrictions do cause the increase of average property values and the situations of Deerhaven Acres now is similar with it of Brookville seven years ago

基本上写的不错，字数也上线了，而且表述清楚，可能性想的也贴切，如果是限时的写的话，这篇文章估计可以4。5~5。5，需要加的就是最好攻击超过3个以上的点，这样判卷人会认为你的思维更紧密。