Issue38 Synergy第五次作业(yangxuan)，欢迎来拍！

yangxuanUID: 2241148

Issue38:"In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books."

Does reading books become less important than before, in the age of television? The speaker claims so, for the reason that people can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books. I concede that television has certain advantages over books, such as offering vivid and immediate information. In most cases, however, reading books is still the essential form of learning.

Admittedly, due to the great power of its vivid three-dimensional images and high-speed record, television provides a more perceptual knowledge to people. When it comes to some famous and beautiful tourist attractions (e.g., the Imperial Palace, the Great Wall in China and the pyramids in Egypt), which cannot be available in firsthand experience, books cannot compete with television, however keen the author is or however lively the description is. Also, through television, one can learn the latest news about the outcome of President Election, the serious events such as September 11 Attacks, the tidal wave in Indonesia, and the spread of bird flu, instead of several figures from books after a long time. Thus, television plays a vital role/a considerable part in figural tutorial, live broadcast and remote programs.

However, when it comes to abstract theories or ideas and a more rational knowledge, reading books cannot be replaced by television. Certain theories, due to its complexity and profound truth, is difficult for any individual to understand just through images, even though a genius he or she may be,(是否该用倒装？). Can one really comprehend the Quantum Mechanics without studying several books or articles? Or can one have a deep insight of religious belief merely through a rough introduction from television. In a word, unless conscientiously reading documents, literatures, articles, and books can one hardly appreciate the essence of certain theories or thoughts.

Moreover, reading books is an active learning, while television is a passive process. When could one learn? What kind of knowledge is available? Which level could one reach? All these are determined only by a program schedule. Moreover, in many cases, especially the political thoughts, television serves as a function of publicity/propaganda, instead of proceeding from the objective facts; that is, in one sense, it prevent individuals from comprehensively learn about certain issues. On the contrary, books offer a dramatically wide world to people, whatever he or she may be interested in or whatever the level of education is. Besides, books are far more portable so that one can learn in almost any place where television is not available.

In sum, television does play an important role in imparting instant information and providing vivid images for perceptual recognition. However, for a better and profound understanding, one still need to read books in most cases; after all, books are more reflective, philosophical, comprehensive and convenient.

三块半UID: 2202025

Does reading books become less important than before, in the age of television? The speaker claims so, for the reason that people can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books. I concede that television has certain advantages over books, such as offering vivid and immediate information. In most cases, however, reading books is still the essential form of learning.

Admittedly, due to the great power of its vivid three-dimensional images and high-speed record, television provides a more perceptual knowledge to people. When it comes to some famous and beautiful tourist attractions (e.g., the Imperial Palace, the Great Wall in China and the pyramids in Egypt), which cannot be available in firsthand experience, books cannot compete with television, however keen the author is or however lively the description is. Also, through television, one can learn the latest news about the outcome of President Election, the serious events such as September 11 Attacks, the tidal wave in Indonesia, and the spread of bird flu, instead of several figures from books after a long time. （这几个例子都很好啊，而且也可以用于第一点理由，说明电视的直观反映强于阅读．不过我觉得还可以根据这几个例子再写一点内容，论证就更深刻了）Thus, television plays a vital role/a considerable part in figural tutorial, live broadcast and remote programs.

However, when it comes to abstract theories or ideas and a more rational knowledge, reading books cannot be replaced by television. Certain theories, due to its complexity and profound truth, is difficult for any individual to understand just through images, even though a genius he or she may be,(是否该用倒装？) (抱歉，我也不知道该不该用倒装）. Can one really comprehend the Quantum Mechanics without studying several books or articles? Or can one have a deep insight of religious belief merely through a rough introduction from television. In a word, unless conscientiously reading documents, literatures, articles, and books can one hardly appreciate the essence of certain theories or thoughts.（这段关于为什么阅读不可替代的问题没有讲清楚，你的理由只有一句话，马上就来发问，然后急急地结尾，有回避之嫌）

Moreover, reading books is an active learning, while television is a passive process. When could one learn? What kind of knowledge is available? Which level could one reach? All these are determined only by a program schedule. Moreover, in many cases, especially the political thoughts, television serves as a function of publicity/propaganda, instead of proceeding from the objective facts; that is, in one sense, it prevent individuals from comprehensively learn about certain issues. On the contrary, books offer a dramatically wide world to people, whatever he or she may be interested in or whatever the level of education is. Besides, books are far more portable so that one can learn in almost any place where television is not available.（这段不错，有点老米的味道）

In sum, television does play an important role in imparting instant information and providing vivid images for perceptual recognition. However, for a better and profound understanding, one still need to read books in most cases; after all, books are more reflective, philosophical, comprehensive and convenient.

发现你比较喜欢用排比问句，显的有气势．不过这篇文章有点让人觉得故作了，仿佛就是为了发问而做的，有点不自然了，大概是论证还不太充分的原因．我也是个人意见，仅供参考．你的句子写的还是很让我羡慕的，我的句子写的很垃圾，每次作业都郁闷中痛苦，老是几个句子倒来倒去．

westlife007_huUID: 2270665

Does reading books become less important than before, in the age of television? The speaker claims so, for the reason that people can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books. I concede that television has certain advantages over books, such as offering vivid and immediate information. In most cases, however, reading books is still the essential form of learning.

Admittedly, due to the great power of its vivid three-dimensional images and high-speed record, television provides a more perceptual knowledge to people. When it comes to some famous and beautiful tourist attractions such as(e.g., the Imperial Palace, the Great Wall in China and the pyramids in Egypt), which cannot be available in firsthand experience, books cannot compete with television, however keen the author is or however lively the description is. Also, through television, one can learn the latest news about the outcome of President Election, the serious events such as September 11 Attacks, the tidal wave in Indonesia, and the spread of bird flu, instead of several figures from books after a long time. Thus, television plays a vital role/a considerable part in figural tutorial, live broadcast and remote programs.

However, when it comes to abstract theories or ideas and a more rational knowledge, reading books cannot be replaced by television. Certain theories, due to (前面用过,换on account of) its complexity and profound truth, is difficult for any individual to understand just through images, even though a genius he or she may be,(是否该用倒装？).到装应该是这样的吧even though may he or she be genius ,不过I'm not sure,Can one really comprehend the Quantum Mechanics without studying several books or articles? Or can one have a deep insight of religious belief merely through a rough introduction from television. In a word, unless conscientiously reading documents, literatures, articles, and books can one hardly appreciate(这个词在这里作什么讲?如果词语的意思不常用,最好不用在作文里) the essence of certain theories or thoughts.

Moreover, reading books is an active learning, while television is a passive process. (立意很新啊,偶喜欢)When could one learn? What kind of knowledge is available? Which level could one reach? All these are determined only by a program schedule. Moreover, in many cases, especially the political thoughts, television serves as a function of publicity/propaganda, instead of proceeding from the objective facts that is, in one sense, it prevent individuals from comprehensively learn(learning) about certain issues. On the contrary, books offer a dramatically wide world to people, whatever he or she may be interested in or whatever the level of (his or her)education is. Besides, books are far more portable so that one can learn in almost any place where television is not available.
前面的问句写得很好,但是问完了就没下文了.moever以后的内容似乎与TS reading books is an active learning, while television is a passive process脱离了关系,尽管还是有一点联系,但不能很好的证明你的TS

In sum, television does play an important role in imparting instant information and providing vivid images for perceptual recognition. However, for a better and profound understanding, one still need to read books in most cases; after all, books are more reflective, philosophical, comprehensive and convenient
感觉写得还可以,除了第四段讲的不是很清楚以外
另外,你的句子好长啊,读起来很绕
再问你个问题,你的很多用词很奇怪,不知是否真的是地道的表达还是你自己想的,如 figural tutorial,remote programs,tourist attractions,appreciate因为偶很菜,所以如果真的是地道的表达,偶就可以借鉴了

yangxuanUID: 2241148

谢谢楼上的两位！
我很菜，想问一下：老米是谁？老美？
such as处的修改我不是很懂，我是在括号后已经有e.g.应该没错吧。
appreciate的意思就是欣赏，领略，掌握之类吧
关于第四段，后面好象确实写得偏了，谢谢！当时写晕了，呵呵
关于表达，其中很多是查字典的（主要），还有一些是参考别人的，当然也有一部分是自己写的

westlife007_huUID: 2270665

偶的意思是 也可以用such as 这个短语
但是我不知道范文里可不可以用打括号里面写eg这种方式表达
如果可以,那就没什么问题了
如果有这种表达方式,一定告诉偶啊