Which of the following study method do you prefer? Though online courses or be in traditional classroom setting? And state your reasons.
Well, for me, I prefer the latter study method, that is to be in traditional classroom setting. For one thing, in a traditional classroom setting, you can communicate with your teacher at any time. So if you have questions, you can ask your teacher for the answer. For another thing, you study with your classmates. That means you don’t study alone but study with others. That is good for us because if we have any questions we can discuss with classmates. That not only improves our friendship but also makes us understand the problem well.
The reading says that Turing Test can be used to judge whether a machine can think. During the Test, a person should interact with another one which may be either a person or a machine, and after communicating, the person should decide whether they have been talking with a person or a machine. If they judge the machine to be a person, or if they can't tell the difference, then the machine has passed the Test. And if a machine has passed the Turing Test, then it can think. However, in the lecture, the Professor says that this kind of Test tests the behavior rather than thought in some meaning. A machine can do well if there are lots of references that can be used to help the machine answer the questions correctly, even though the machine doesn't understand the questions at all. And he says that even if a machine passed the Turing Test, it may just act intelligent not be really intelligent.
Well, for me, I prefer the latter study method, that is to be in traditional classroom setting. For one thing, in a traditional classroom setting, you can communicate with your teacher at any time. So if you have questions, you can ask your teacher for the answer. For another thing, you study with your classmates. That means you don’t study alone but study with others. That is good for us because if we have any questions we can discuss with classmates. That not only improves our friendship but also makes us understand the problem well.
口语挺好的,不过既然你认为时间较长,但是短了又说不清楚问题的话。可以删减一些没必要的预言。比如I prefer studying in traditional classroom. For one thing和for another thing 改成first and second,这样会给你节约一些时间吧。后面的That用的太多了,可以考虑改写一下。
The reading (+passage, material or part,一个reading有点别扭)says that Turing Test can be used to judge whether a machine(computer,machine的概念有点大,而且是第一次交代,后面用machine似乎没有问题) can think. During the Test, a person should interact with another one which may be either a person or a machine, and after communicating, the person should decide whether they have been talking with a person or a machine. If they judge the machine to be a person, or if they can't tell the difference, then the machine has passed the Test. And if a machine has passed the Turing Test, then it can think. However, in the lecture, the Professor says that this kind of Test tests the behavior rather than thought in some meaning. A machine can do well if there are lots of references that can be used to help the machine answer the questions correctly, even though the machine doesn't understand the questions at all. And he says that even if a machine passed the Turing Test, it may just act intelligent not be really intelligent.
字数少的原因应该是一些套话,也就是模板的话,比如这种对立的问题用argument中的模板就挺好的。如果加了这些的话,相信你对字数就会挺满意了。
细节交代的很清楚,就是结构有点模糊,因为都集中在一个段落里了。可以考虑分开来写的。
PS:又看了一遍,细节是不错。但是交代reading part 和lecture之间的关系的句子太少了。我觉得加入那些所谓的模板就好了。还是模板问题:)