生如夏花第五次作业

appcherUID: 2224936

感觉题目根ETS的思路还是很有差距的
最好找点类似的，总结几个模板就好了。

The speaker told us that the Turning Test is doubted by one philosopher, and presented two reasons the philosopher gave us.  The Turning Test simply based on the people's interaction in two rooms and is somewhat flawed, which only test the computer's behavior and fail in demonstrating whether computers think.


First of all, the speaker pointed out a special situation that one Chinese-speaking in one room but the person in other room is English-speaking. When he asks questions, the person in other room can not understand his meanings. But based on some reference the person also can break the code and gets responses. This behavior can not demonstrate that the person used intelligence. So in this situation we can not prove that Turning Test can test that whether computers think.


In addition, computers can be programmed outputs following different inputs.  This does not mean that computers have intelligence and can give response to different questions.


In a nutshell, based on the discussions demonstrated above, the contents in the reading passage are thoroughly jeopardized by the speaker. Turning Test just is a behavior test and can not test intelligence.

口语:

Which of the following study method do you prefer? Though online courses or be in traditional classroom setting? And state your reasons.

Comparing with both of them, I think traditional classroom setting is much better.
First of all, I cannot focus my energy on the class through online courses. Because of internet, I would inevitably spend some time on other things for example news, videos, cyber games and so on. But in the traditional classroom, we only can study and cannot do others.
Besides, in traditional classroom I can study with some good classmates. We can discuss problems together and enjoy life after class. Perhaps someone will become my good friends.

lisha726UID: 2282972

生如夏花第五次作业

感觉题目根ETS的思路还是很有差距的
最好找点类似的，总结几个模板就好了。

The speaker told us that the Turning Test is doubted by one philosopher, and presented two reasons the philosopher gave us.  The Turning Test simply based on the people's interaction in two rooms and is somewhat flawed, which only test the computer's behavior and fail in demonstrating whether computers can think.[开头到底有多大的用。。不过OG有5分范文直接切入主题，且只用一段的。。]


First of all, the speaker pointed out a special situation that one Chinese-speaking in one room but the person in other room is English-speaking. When he asks questions, the person in other room can not understand his meanings. But based on some reference the person also can break the code and gets responses. This behavior can not demonstrate that the person used intelligence. So in this situation we can not prove that Turning Test can test that whether computers think.[我觉得应该再写的明确点，和the reading中的观点矛盾；个人意见，欢迎商讨]


In addition, computers can be programmed outputs following different inputs.  This does not mean that computers have intelligence and can give response to different questions.


In a nutshell[这个词组好], based on the discussions demonstrated above, the contents in the reading passage are thoroughly jeopardized by the speaker. Turning Test just is a behavior test and can not test intelligence.[OG的5分范文，没有几个有结尾的，不过这样也挺好的]

其实我现在也是在对综合写作的探索中，最近在看OG,DELTA,；如果不对，欢迎指正。

口语:

Which of the following study method do you prefer? Though online courses or be in traditional classroom setting? And state your reasons.

Comparing with both of them, I think traditional classroom setting is much better.
First of all, I cannot focus my energy on the class through online courses. Because of internet, I would inevitably spend some time on other things for example news, videos, cyber games and so on. But in the traditional classroom, we only can study and cannot do others.
Besides, in traditional classroom I can study with some good classmates. We can discuss problems together and enjoy life after class. Perhaps someone will become my good friends.