IMPULSE作文小组----- 生活习惯类-Tuesday题练习

19811010316UID: 2220703

人们期待只在一个企业或者只给一个雇主工作是否现实（周二作业）]

Nowadays, there are more and more corporations organized around us day by day and people have more choices in choosing their employers than ever before. However, recently, people have been involving a hot discussion about whether an employee can or should work in one corporation for his whole life. As far as I am concerned, it is clear that one person work in a corporation all long not only impossible but also unnecessary. I have a couple of reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, hardly a employer can or will guarantee how long it will be that he or she hires a worker, because different companies have different conditions. There are two types of companies that couldn't ensure the special time period of hiring workers. The first type is that they have difficult in making sure how long will be exited in commercial area, they may bankrupt some day because of their bad running methods and strategies. And so, they will not be capable of employing worker for a certain period so that employees must leave that company even if he or she isn't willing to depart from his or her beloved company. The second type is attributed to employees themselves. Maybe a company has strong capacity in both economy and technology and its CEO can employ a labor for his whole life, nevertheless, the worker is not experienced and skillful and not able to serve that corporation's demand. Therefore, in these two cases, employees will not be hired for whole life time.

In the second place, working in as more as possible corporations can supply employees a lot of useful working experience and realize one's self-value well. In modern life, if a worker just works in one corporation, he or she scarcely can accumulate enough experience for undergoing more heavy working pressure. Then the corporation which hold these employees will be vulnerable to competition that coming from other corporations. Finally, these corporations can do nothing but dismiss their employees or declare their collapse. In this case, it is almost impossible for these fired employees to hunt new jobs stemming from their limited working experience. On the other hand, people prefer to compare themselves with others in working experience in order to express their personal value. It seems that if you have never worked in more than three corporations, people will not believe that you acquire a large amount of working experience and have a great ability in pursuing jobs. In a word, people consider changing corporations as a standard to balance others’ working abilities and gauge others’ feats in careers.

To sum up, I maintain that, either for personal respect or other peoples' angles, working in different corporations is a good choice for an employee. Under this choice, they can get enough working experience, fulfill personal value and improve working abilities.

saintjUID: 2248994

Nowadays, there are more and more corporations organized around us day by day and people have more choices in choosing their employers than ever before. However, recently, people have been involving (in) a hot discussion about whether an employee can or should work in one corporation for his whole life. As far as I am concerned, it is clear that one person work in a corporation all long not only impossible but also unnecessary. I have a couple of reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, hardly a (any) employer can or will guarantee how long it will be that he or she hires a worker, because different companies have different conditions. There are two types of companies that couldn't ensure the special time period of hiring workers. The first type is that they have difficult in making sure how long will be exited (exiting) in commercial area, they may bankrupt some day because of their bad running methods and strategies. And so, they will not be capable of employing worker (workers) for a certain period so that employees must leave that company even if he or she isn't willing to depart from his or her beloved company. The second type is attributed to employees themselves. Maybe a company has strong capacity in both economy and technology and its CEO can employ a labor for his whole life, nevertheless, the worker is not experienced and skillful and not able to serve that corporation's demand. Therefore, in these two cases, employees will not be hired for whole life time..G:R|KW/j#z

寄托家园,LK
n2_%Syb z
In the second place, working in as more as possible corporations can supply employees a lot of useful working experience and realize one's self-value well. In modern life, if a worker just works in one corporation, he or she scarcely can accumulate enough experience for undergoing more heavy working pressure. Then the corporation which hold these employees will be vulnerable to competition that coming from other corporations. Finally, these corporations can do nothing but dismiss their employees or declare their collapse. In this case, it is almost impossible for these fired employees to hunt new jobs stemming from their limited working experience. On the other hand, people prefer to compare themselves with others in working experience in order to express their personal value. It seems that if you have never worked in more than three corporations, people will not believe that you acquire a large amount of working experience and have a great ability in pursuing jobs. In a word, people consider changing corporations as a standard to balance others’ working abilities and gauge others’ feats in careers.
|留学|签证|TOEFL|GRE1n6`I)S;@q4RRSP
To sum up, I maintain that, either for personal respect or other peoples' angles, working in different corporations is a good choice for an employee. Under this choice, they can get enough working experience, fulfill personal value and improve working abilities.

看了你的文章和lemon1kg的文章，我在想这篇文章的两个方面，客观和主观，明显你都写到，但是更注重于客观。学习了。

双手的温柔UID: 173110

19811010316
Nowadays, there are more and more corporations organized around us day by day [这半句好绕，可以简化下] and people have more choices in choosing their employers than ever before. However, recently, people have been involving [involved in] a hot discussion about whether an employee can or should work in one corporation for his whole life. As far as I am concerned, it is clear that one person work in a corporation all [life] long [is] not only impossible but also unnecessary. I have a couple of reasons to support my opinion.

First of all, hardly a employer can or will guarantee how long it will be that he or she [这个地方用he or she不好，因为公司更多时候比较抽象，不好拟人] hires a worker, because different companies have different conditions. There are two types of companies that couldn't ensure the special time period of hiring workers. The first type is that they have difficult in making sure how long will be exited in commercial area, they may bankrupt some day because of their bad running methods and strategies. And so, they will not be capable of employing [hiring] worker for a certain period so that employees must leave that company even if he or she isn't willing to depart from his or her beloved company. The second type is attributed to employees themselves. Maybe a company has strong capacity in both economy and technology and its CEO can employ a labor for his whole life, nevertheless, the worker is not experienced and skillful and not able to serve that corporation's demand. Therefore, in these two cases, employees will not be hired for whole life time.

In the second place, working in as more as possible corporations can supply employees a lot of useful working experience and realize one's self-value well. In modern life, if a worker just works in one corporation, he or she scarcely can accumulate enough experience for undergoing more heavy working pressure. Then the corporation which hold [hire] these employees will be vulnerable to [in] competition that coming from other corporations. Finally, these corporations can do nothing but dismiss[lay off] their employees or declare their collapse. In this case, it is almost impossible for these fired employees to hunt new jobs stemming [stem] from their limited working experience. On the other hand, people prefer to compare themselves with others in working experience in order to express their personal value. It seems that if you have never worked in more than three corporations, people will not believe that you acquire a large amount of working experience and have a great ability in pursuing jobs. In a word, people consider changing corporations as a standard to balance others’ working abilities and gauge others’ feats in careers.

To sum up, I maintain that, either for personal respect or other peoples' angles, working in different corporations is a good choice for an employee. Under this choice, they can get enough working experience, fulfill personal value and improve working abilities.

anchorite2006UID: 2304956

As an old saying goes: people moving alive, plants moving dead. So I disagree with that (能不能加the opinion that,否则好像挺别扭)one works at one place all his/her life time. It is unreasonable and unpractical for those people because of the working mode will hamper their progress. Also, the company pursuits(pursuit 是名词,pursues) higher development will not adopt this working mode.
*` ?&m3X {
v y
First of all, most of employees who have to afford the home expenditure, parents' adaptation, and children's education fee want to earn more payment making the families live a better life. They usually graduate from universities, work at companies for several years and change work places. At the first working time, they learn knowledge and increase their experiences, after all what they learned in the universities are just theoretic, not the reality experience. After several years, changing another company meanings the higher payment and the better chance to promote, which is an all-know but covered secret. Thus, just from this point, we can see that changing job happens among this generation of young people frequently.
(这一段感觉有点怪，我愈发不太好，不敢乱改)

Furthermore, working at unchanged place will limit one's development and narrow his/her horizon. If one employee knows that whether the job he/she done is well or not could not be fired, does he/she work the same as usually? According to the research, people will not progress or even decrease abilities（是这么用么？）without the pressure. Nowadays, there is little place where does not exist pressure but totally opposite. Only those who could endure the challenge and the pressure will be succeed, on the contrast, those who want living at a life-time employment will not be succeed at all. Thus, life-time employment dose not suit employees who do not want a useless life.

Last, the company which should adopt new technology otherwise will not progress will be hampered by those older employees who work long time in the company but the ability of learning is limited. Although those older employees have plentiful experiences, the company needs new power to push itself not the experience already had. For example, In the field of IT, those old employees must retired or change job because of the learning efficiency is slower than that of those younger employee due to the high age. 寄托家园0?1D(d q(_ q T U
        _%I!Y4h
g
T1_ t1S {.O
To sum up, this generation young people had resurrected their attitudes, unlike the earlier generation who like working stabile. They yearn for being challenge and learning experiences. Meanwhile, the boss also wants a vibrant and creative company.  

我觉得总体上挺流畅的，但一些细节还要提高。由于我实力较弱，而且前面的同学改的很细。语法上有什么问题就不敢多说了。

[ 本帖最后由 anchorite2006 于 2008-7-30 14:13 编辑 ]

19811010316UID: 2220703

原帖由 anchorite2006 于 2008-7-30 14:09 发表
As an old saying goes: people moving alive, plants moving dead. So I disagree with that (能不能加the opinion that,否则好像挺别扭)one works at one place all his/her life time. It is unreasonable a ...

兄弟。太不够敬业了吧。把别的同学的文章粘到我这了。。。还没帮我改阿。哈哈。