寄托天下
查看: 1256|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[活动] impulse 作文小组 个人成功 技术类 周一作业 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
377
注册时间
2008-7-11
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2008-8-11 17:36:10 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

你认为接下来20 年汽车的使用会不会减少(周一作业)

It has long been a controversial issue that whether the use of automobile will decrease in the following 20 years. Different people hold different viewpoints. Some assert that in order to keep our environment from further pollution; people will reduce the use of automobile. However, from my point of view, I can hardly agree with this statement after deep consideration. I will explain my opinion based on the following reasons.

First of all, the production of automobile will not be lessened. For the majority of developed or less developed countries, industry of automobile holds the balance on the percentage of a nation’s GDP. While most of those countries will set down some relevant policies for protecting environment, like increasing the price of fossil fuel so as to debase the use of automobile, they will not really take some strict measures to restrain the production of automobile. Because it will result in serious economy losses that they are afraid of tremendously. For example, if Japan restrict of the production of TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, the Japanese economy will encounter a severe impact.

In the next place, none of other vehicles could replace or influence the status of the automobile in the transportation in the following predictable decades. If conditions permit, most of people will take the automobile as their fist choice when they plan to travel, visit, or work. The main reason is the convenience from it. For instance, if you travel a place not very far from your home by your car, you can enjoy yourselves in the beautiful scenery without the concern of missing the scheduled flight and visit every scenic point follow your inclinations.

Last but not least, the people’s consciousness of environmental protection will not be stepped up in barely 20 years. Although most of countries are advocating riding bicycle or walking when the distance from your start to destination is not very long. It has less effect especially in some less developed countries. The chief reason is people of those countries hold low consciousness of environmental protection. In other words, the quality of people is not high enough to realize this problem or even though they have realized it but not willing to take actions.

As we know, enhancing people’s quality is a considerably hard and time-consuming job.

There, taking all above-mentioned reasons into consideration, we can see decreasing the use of automobile in the following 20 years is less possible. Because the production of car will not be allayed, no other vehicles could replace automobile, and the consciousness of environmental protection will not be improved rapidly in the next 20 years

0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
5
寄托币
1467
注册时间
2006-6-9
精华
2
帖子
12
沙发
发表于 2008-8-11 22:52:53 |只看该作者

It has long been a controversial issue that whether the use of automobile will decrease in the following 20 years. Different people hold different viewpoints. Some assert that in order to keep our environment from further pollution; people will reduce the use of automobile. However, from my point of view, I can hardly agree with this statement after deep consideration. I will explain my opinion based on the following reasons.

First of all, the production of automobile will not be lessened. For the majority of developed or less developed countries, industry of automobile holds the balance on the percentage of a nation’s GDP. While most of those countries will set down some relevant policies for protecting environment, like increasing the price of fossil fuel so as to debase the use of automobile, they will not really take some strict measures to restrain the production of automobile. Because it will result in serious economy losses that they are afraid of tremendously. For example, if Japan restrict of the production of TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, the Japanese economy will encounter a severe impact(unbelievable).

In the next place, none of other vehicles could replace or influence the status of the automobile in the transportation in the following predictable decades. If conditions permit, most of people will take the automobile as their fist choice when they plan to travel, visit, or work. The main reason is the convenience from it. For instance, if you travel a place not very far from your home by your car, you can enjoy yourselves in the beautiful scenery without the concern of missing the scheduled flight and visit every scenic point follow your inclinations.

Last but not least, the people’s consciousness of environmental protection will not be stepped up in barely 20 years. Although most of countries are advocating riding bicycle or walking when the distance from your start to destination is not very long. It has less effect especially in some less developed countries. The chief reason is people of those countries hold low consciousness of environmental protection. In other words, the quality of people is not high enough to realize this problem or even though they have realized it but not willing to take actions.

As we know, enhancing people’s quality is a considerably hard and time-consuming job. There, taking all above-mentioned reasons into consideration, we can see that decreasing the use of automobile in the following 20 years is less possible. Because the production of car will not be allayed, no other vehicles could replace automobile, and the consciousness of environmental protection will not be improved rapidly in the next 20 years


写的非常好。无论是句,词和思路都已经达到了相当水平。恭喜。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
961
注册时间
2004-8-4
精华
0
帖子
0
板凳
发表于 2008-8-12 01:27:09 |只看该作者
迷茫者

[For a long time, it has been...]It has long been a controversial issue that whether the use of automobile will decrease in the following 20 years. Different people hold different viewpoints. Some assert that in order to keep our environment from further pollution; people will reduce the use of automobile. However, from my point of view, I can hardly agree with this statement after deep consideration. I will explain my opinion based on the following reasons.

First of all, the production of automobile will not be lessened. For the majority of developed or less developed countries, industry of automobile holds the balance on the percentage of a nation’s GDP. While most of those countries will set down some relevant policies for protecting environment, like increasing the price of fossil fuel so as to debase the use of automobile, they will not really take some strict measures to restrain the production of automobile. Because it will result in serious economy losses that they are afraid of tremendously. For example, if Japan restrict of the production of TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, the Japanese economy will encounter a severe impact.
good point!


In the next place, none of other vehicles could replace or influence the status of the automobile in the transportation in the following predictable decades. If conditions permit, most of people will take the automobile as their fist choice when they plan to travel, visit, or work. The main reason is the convenience from [of] it. For instance, if you travel a place not very far from your home by your [own] car, you can enjoy yourselves in the beautiful scenery without the concern of missing the scheduled flight and visit every scenic point follow your inclinations.


Last but not least, the people’s consciousness of environmental protection will not be stepped up in barely 20 years. Although most of countries are advocating riding bicycle or walking when the distance from your start to destination is not very long. It has less effect especially in some less developed countries. The chief reason is people of those countries hold low consciousness of environmental protection. In other words, the quality of people is not high enough to realize this problem or even though they have realized it but not willing to take actions. As we know, enhancing people’s quality is a considerably hard and time-consuming job.
这个point:一,不是所有人愿意,效果可能打折。二,不一定能实施-很多人住的都很远。实际上离单位正好很近的人很好。然后最好加一句,所以虽然因为我们需要也应当支持环保,但因此预测20年内汽车使用会大幅减少,依然是没有现实依据的。

最好用enhance the awareness of environment protection吧,直接说素质感觉有点不好哦:)

There, taking all above-mentioned reasons into consideration, we can see decreasing the use of automobile in the following 20 years is less possible. Because the production of car will not be allayed, no other vehicles could replace automobile, and the consciousness of environmental protection will not be improved rapidly in the next 20 years.

整体不错,记得比你刚加入的时候写的好了很多。精炼流畅。加油!

下次能不能麻烦排下版再发贴,这样看着很累。
工作考T党。。。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
287
注册时间
2006-8-13
精华
0
帖子
1
地板
发表于 2008-8-12 06:14:00 |只看该作者
It has long been a controversial issue that whether the use of automobile will decrease in the following 20 years. Different people hold different viewpoints. Some assert that in order to keep our environment from further pollution; people will reduce the use of automobile. However, from my point of view, I can hardly agree with this statement after deep consideration. I will explain my opinion based on the following reasons.
First of all, the production of automobile will not be lessened. For the majority of developed or less developed countries, industry of automobile(automobile industry) holds the balance on the percentage of a nation’s GDP. While most of those countries will set down some relevant policies for protecting environment, like increasing the price of fossil fuel so as to debase the use of automobile, they will not really take some strict measures to restrain the production of automobile. Because it will result in serious economy losses that they are afraid of tremendously. For example, if Japan restrict of the production of TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, the Japanese economy will encounter a severe impact.
In the next place, none of other vehicles could replace or influence the status of the automobile in the transportation in the following predictable decades. If conditions permit, most of people will take the automobile as their fist choice when they plan to travel, visit, or work. The main reason is the convenience from it. For instance, if you travel to a place not verytoo far from your home by your car, you can enjoy yourselves in the beautiful scenery without the concern of missing the scheduled flight and visit every scenic point follow your inclinations.
Last but not the least, the people’s consciousness(concern) of environmental protection will not be stepped up in barely 20 years. Although most of countries are advocating riding bicycle or walking when the distance from your start to destination is not very long. It has less effect especially in some less developed countries. The chief reason is people of those countries hold low consciousness of environmental protection. In other words, the quality of people is not high enough to realize this problem or even though they have realized it but are not willing to take actions.
As we know, enhancing people’s quality is a considerably hard and time-consuming job.
There, taking all above-mentioned reasons into consideration, we can see that decreasing the use of automobile in the following 20 years is less possible. Because the production of car will not be allayed, no other vehicles could replace automobile, and the consciousness of environmental protection will not be improved rapidly in the next 20 years

使用道具 举报

RE: impulse 作文小组 个人成功 技术类 周一作业 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
impulse 作文小组 个人成功 技术类 周一作业
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-868219-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部