寄托天下
查看: 1254|回复: 6

[未归类] 第四周专题 汽车的使用会不会减少(周一作业)\ [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
324
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2008-8-11 13:51:43 |显示全部楼层

           
Automobiles offer both convenience and harm to humans in the past and now. According to their disadvantages, quite a few experts predict that automobiles would be replaced by other vehicles. In my view, however, the number of automobiles would be less likely to decrease in the future.

First of all, the users of cars would still increase responding to the increasing population in the world and the improving living standards. In spite of the policy of birth control implemented in many countries, increasing population is an avoidable fact. Thus in the extended 20 years, more and more people would have to drive cars to commute to and from their workplace. There will be more transportation means – such as - buses, cars, or even trunks.

In addition, as the expansion of the advanced road and highway systems, more and more people are likely to choose cars as their main transportation means. There will be more (?) broad, tree-lined roads; more developed bus lines; and more comfortable cars in the 20 years. Therefore, the number of citizens who are fond of automobiles would increase.

Finally, automobiles to humans are what fish to water. For instance, because of the increasingly severe air pollution exhausted from cars in the cities, more and more people in the future would like to live in the countryside for better living conditions. The fresh air, acres of grass, and the quiet have magic power and do wonders for dwellers. Hence, due to the convenience of automobiles, residents are more likely to drive to cities for work, and for entertainment.  

Of course, the automobiles are not everything for human beings. Other transportation means in or of themselves have their merits. For example, the air planes may be more suited to the long distance trip; trains may be faster; subways may cause less air pollutions.

By and large, although trains, airplanes, and subways are always available in the cities, more and more dwellers would be crazy about automobile.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
5
寄托币
1467
注册时间
2006-6-9
精华
2
帖子
12
发表于 2008-8-11 22:17:22 |显示全部楼层
Automobiles offer both convenience and harm to humans in the past and now. According to their disadvantages, quite a few experts predict that automobiles would be replaced by other vehicles. In my view, however, the number of automobiles would be less likely to decrease in the future.`a;h/`:{9J2t

|留学|签证|TOEFL|GRE8s[{KH2vCk
First of all, the users of cars would still increase responding to the increasing population in the world and the improving living standards. In spite of the policy of birth control implemented in many countries, increasing population is an avoidable fact. Thus in the extended 20 years, more and more people would have to drive cars to commute to and from their workplace. There will be more transportation means – such as - buses, cars, or even trunks.

In addition, as the expansion of the advanced road and highway systems, more and more people are likely to choose cars as their main transportation means. There will be more (?) broad, tree-lined roads; more developed bus lines; and more comfortable cars in the 20 years. Therefore, the number of citizens who are fond of automobiles would increase.
   
Finally, automobiles to humans are what fish to water. For instance, because of the increasingly severe air pollution exhausted(emitted) from cars in the cities, more and more people in the future would like to live in the countryside for better living conditions. The fresh air, acres of grass, and the quiet have magic power and do wonders for dwellers. Hence, due to the convenience of automobiles, residents are more likely to drive to cities for work, and for entertainment.  

Of course, the automobiles are not everything for human beings. Other transportation means in or of themselves have their merits. For example, the air planes may be more suited to the long distance trip; trains may be faster; subways may cause less air pollutions.bbs.gter.netno%Zj#D+Ex

By and large, although trains, airplanes, and subways are always available in the cities, more and more dwellers would be crazy about automobile.

进步很大啊。
努力。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
324
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2008-8-12 00:23:26 |显示全部楼层

太感谢您每次都给我鼓励的话!充满信心!

:handshake

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
287
注册时间
2006-8-13
精华
0
帖子
1
发表于 2008-8-12 05:42:13 |显示全部楼层
Automobiles offer both convenience and harm to humans in the past and now. According to their disadvantages, quite a few experts predict that automobiles would be replaced by other vehicles. In my view, however, the number of automobiles would be less likely to decrease in the future.
First of all, the users of cars would still increase responding to the increasing population in the world(the increase of population in the world) and the improving living standards( the improvement of living standards). In spite of the policy of birth control implemented in many countries, increasing population is an avoidable fact. Thus in the extended 20 years, more and more people would have to drive cars to commute to and from between their workplace and home. There will be more transportation means – such as - buses, cars, or even truncks.
­
In addition, as the expansion of the advanced road and highway systems, more and more people are likely to choose cars as their main transportation means. There will be more (?) broad, tree-lined roads; more developed bus lines; and more comfortable cars in the 20 years. Therefore, the number of citizens who are fond of automobiles would increase.
Finally, automobiles are to humans are what fish are to water. For instance, because of the increasingly severe air pollution exhausted from cars in the cities, more and more people in the future would like to live in the countryside for better living conditions. The fresh air, acres of grass, and the quiet have magic power and do wonders for dwellers. Hence, due to the convenience of automobiles, residents are more likely to drive to cities for work, and for entertainment.  
Of course, the automobiles are not do not mean everything for human beings. Other transportation means in or of themselves have their merits. For example, the air planes may be more suited to the long distance trip; trains may be faster; subways may cause less air pollutions.
By and large, although trains, airplanes, and subways are always available in the cities, more and more dwellers would be crazy about automobile.



[ 本帖最后由 ourtrans 于 2008-8-12 05:43 编辑 ]

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
492
注册时间
2006-2-22
精华
0
帖子
3
发表于 2008-8-12 09:32:04 |显示全部楼层
In addition, as the expansion of the advanced road and highway systems, more and more people are likely to choose cars as their main transportation means. There will be more (?) broad, tree-lined roads; more developed bus lines; and more comfortable cars in the 20 years. Therefore, the number of citizens who are fond of automobiles would increase.

  Finally, automobiles to humans are what fish to water. For instance, because of the increasingly severe air pollution exhausted(emitted) from cars in the cities, more and more people in the future would like to live in the countryside for better living conditions. The fresh air, acres of grass, and the quiet have magic power and do wonders for dwellers. Hence, due to the convenience of automobiles, residents are more likely to drive to cities for work, and for entertainment.  

 这两段有点生硬,还有不少低级错误,如The fresh air, acres of grass, and the quiet (quietude),希望LZ再提高点。
 By and large, not bad . keep on going~
最想要去的地方,怎么能在半路就返航?

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
324
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2008-8-12 14:09:59 |显示全部楼层

谢谢

:handshake

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
324
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2008-8-12 14:21:20 |显示全部楼层

受益匪浅啊!呵呵

:handshake

使用道具 举报

RE: 第四周专题 汽车的使用会不会减少(周一作业)\ [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
第四周专题 汽车的使用会不会减少(周一作业)\
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-868134-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部