issue144 jingjing作业（kito）

jingjingtousUID：2164820

TOPIC：ISSUE 144 - "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."

*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.

提纲：（平衡观点）
1 不应该把artist和critic的作用分割开，两者都对艺术的不朽价值有贡献。
2 艺术家是具有天赋的作品的创造者，他们不仅有高超的技巧还赋予作品丰富的内涵。（达芬奇的Mona Lisa, 贝多芬的第九交响曲）
3 评论家公正的给予艺术作品肯定或否定的评价，使好的艺术作品具有永恒的价值（唐吉诃德）
通过评论家的评论，人们更了解作品的思想内涵。
4 同时有些艺术家也是评论家，在评论的同时融入了自己的思想提升了作品的艺术价值。（fanvism, cubism, impressionism)
5 艺术家赋予艺术作品生命而评论家挖掘这些作品的内在价值，正是二者的贡献使艺术作品具有永恒的价值而保留至今。


Who gives the society something of lasting value--the artist or the critic? The speaker obviously considers the former for the reason they give birth to the artic works. However, in my view, the critic also contributes to the great works by evaluating them and discovering their potential values. Thus, it is ridiculous to divide the artist and the critic from their contributions to arts. Without either of them, we cannot appreciate and understand the artic works and the hidden values behind them.

The artists are people who have extraordinary talent, proficient skills and great ideas. They give birth to the works and pin their spirits and hopes into them. From the aesthetic and humanistic angle, they perceive the surroundings carefully and suspiciously and use their brushes or pencils to depict what they see and what they think. Their creativity sometimes seems so intangible that common people cannot understand their potential mind which is contained in their works. Consider the famous painting---Mona Lisa made by Dar Vinci, until now people still cannot completely understand the mysterious smiling. However, it is the mysterious smiling that aptly reflects the greatness of this painting. When people are appreciating the great painting, they were inspired by the theme hidden behind the beauty and mystery, in which the painting expresses a strong arouse for humanity during the Naissance in Italy. Additionally, to a huge extent, the artists strongly express their mental world through their distinctive works. The great musician--Beethoven quickly comes into our mind. From his unprecedented masterpiece--The Ninth Symphony, we heard his voice from his deep heart--to struggle with the fate unyieldingly.

Admittedly, the artist gives life to the great works and makes them enriched with colorful ideas and potential values, nonetheless, without the excavating of the critic, the virtues and values of grand works would be buried by the fleeting time. The critics are people who evaluate the artic works, give their views and comments to the artists and sometimes illustrate the hidden and internal spirits and values of one masterpiece to the commons. They purify the value and life of one artistic work by assessing them impartially. Thanks to their works, the value of great arts will be preserved permanently and its foibles would be abandoned into the historical abysmal. When we take a look at the history retrospect, we could find that many examples of this point. Consider " Don Quixote ", when the saga novel was published, it was regarded no more than a farce at all. Nevertheless, about 100 years later, it has been praised as we evaluated today. From where was the great conversion stemming? One may say the conversion was attributable to the author, the creator of the character of the work. It is true indeed, however, there was another basilic cause hidden in history, and that was the critic. With the critiques of Byron and Heine, the greatness of the work was dug out gradually and became known for people all over the world. Nowadays, readers who prefer the adventures described in the fiction were always obsessed by the funny polt and admire the bravery and optimism of the hero.

We cannot definitely define the critics by their evaluations to artistic works and the artists by their productions of arts. Because in some cases an artist himself is a critic. He adds his views, positions, even emotions into the works by giving the evaluation of them accurately and fairly. As a consequence, the comments from the critics augment the values of artists' creations. For instance, we know some schools of drawing in which express extraordinary and remarkable styles, such as the "fanvism", the "cubism" or the "impressionism", it is the critics who label the distinct styles of drawing that we could quickly recognize them by hearing the styles. Thus, the denomination of the critics has great impacts on their values and characteristics, and also made these works everlasting.

To sum up, the artist created the great works and pint their ideas and spirits on them by which people can be inspired: the critic excavated the potential values from the great works and gave them new meanings. With both artists and critics, we can benefit and enjoy the lasting values of arts.

jingjingtousUID：2164820

有拍必回，请留下你的链接！非常感谢！！

智恩UID：2160717

提纲：（平衡观点）
1 不应该把artist和critic的作用分割开，两者都对艺术的不朽价值有贡献。
2 艺术家是具有天赋的作品的创造者，他们不仅有高超的技巧还赋予作品丰富的内涵。（达芬奇的Mona Lisa, 贝多芬的第九交响曲）
3 评论家公正的给予艺术作品肯定或否定的评价，使好的艺术作品具有永恒的价值（唐吉诃德）
通过评论家的评论，人们更了解作品的思想内涵。
4 同时有些艺术家也是评论家，在评论的同时融入了自己的思想提升了作品的艺术价值。（fanvism, cubism, impressionism)
5 艺术家赋予艺术作品生命而评论家挖掘这些作品的内在价值，正是二者的贡献使艺术作品具有永恒的价值而保留至今。（想得好周密啊，每次读你的作文，有读范文的感觉，惭愧啊）

Who gives the society something of lasting value--the artist or the critic? The speaker obviously considers the former for the reason they give birth to the artic works. However, in my view, the critic also contributes to the great works by evaluating them and discovering their potential values. Thus, it is ridiculous to divide the artist and the critic from their contributions to arts. Without either of them, we cannot appreciate and understand the artic works and the hidden values behind them.

The artists are people who have extraordinary talent, proficient skills and great ideas. They give birth to the works and pin their spirits and hopes（hope好像是不可数的） into them. From the aesthetic and humanistic angle, they perceive the surroundings carefully and suspiciously and use their brushes or pencils to depict what they see and what they think. Their creativity sometimes seems so intangible（靓词啊！） that common people cannot understand their potential mind which is contained in their works. Consider the famous painting---Mona Lisa made by Dar Vinci, until now people still cannot completely understand the mysterious smiling. However, it is the mysterious smiling that aptly reflects the greatness of this painting. When people are appreciating the great painting, they were inspired by the theme hidden behind the beauty and mystery, in which the painting expresses a strong arouse for humanity during the Naissance in Italy. Additionally, to a huge extent, the artists strongly express their mental world through their distinctive works. The great musician--Beethoven quickly comes into our mind. From his unprecedented masterpiece--The Ninth Symphony, we heard his voice from his deep heart--to struggle with the fate unyieldingly.（写得好好哦，词汇丰富，好多词我还查了查因为不认识或不熟悉，例子合理，句子赋予变换，赞！！）

Admittedly, the artist gives life to the great works and makes them enriched with colorful ideas and potential values, nonetheless, without the excavating of the critic, the virtues and values of grand works would be buried by the fleeting time. The critics are people who evaluate the artic works, give their views and comments to the artists and sometimes illustrate the hidden and internal spirits（spirit） and values of one masterpiece to the commons. They purify the value and life of one artistic work by assessing them impartially. Thanks to their works, the value of great arts will be preserved permanently and its foibles would be abandoned into the historical abysmal. When we take a look at the history retrospect, we could find that many examples of this point. Consider " Don Quixote ", when the saga novel was published, it was regarded no more than a farce at all. Nevertheless, about 100 years later, it has been praised as we evaluated today. From where was the great conversion stemming? One may say the conversion was attributable to the author, the creator of the character of the work. It is true indeed, however, there was another basilic（第一次见这个词，你的词汇功底好深厚啊！） cause hidden in history, and that was the critic. With the critiques of Byron and Heine, the greatness of the work was dug out gradually and became known for people all over the world. Nowadays, readers who prefer the adventures described in the fiction were always obsessed by the funny polt and admire the bravery and optimism of the hero.

We cannot definitely define the critics by their evaluations to artistic works and the artists by their productions of arts. Because in some cases an artist himself is a critic. He adds his views, positions, even emotions into the works by giving the evaluation of them accurately and fairly. As a consequence, the comments from the critics augment the values of artists' creations. For instance, we know some schools of drawing in which express extraordinary and remarkable styles, such as the "fanvism", the "cubism" or the "impressionism", it is the critics who label the distinct styles of drawing that we could quickly recognize them by hearing the styles. Thus, the denomination of the critics has great impacts on their values and characteristics, and also made these works everlasting.（这断思路很好，但感觉说得不是非常清楚）

To sum up, the artist created the great works and pint their ideas and spirits（spirit） on them by which people can be inspired: the critic excavated the potential values from the great works and gave them new meanings. With both artists and critics, we can benefit and enjoy the lasting values of arts.（实在没明白你为什么最后一段都用过去时？）

我实在是没找出什么错误，思路也很好，能写出这种文章，我真是佩服你啊！

@amy@UID：209096

嗯~~  也学习了一下，呵呵，确实很不错啊

kito9695UID：209685

恩,学到好多东西,佩服佩服~

jingjingtousUID：2164820

其实关于唐吉诃德的例子我参考了范文，不过写的时候是用自己的语言概括的
写完再看范文，才知道自己写的很垃圾，于是又做了较大的改动，干脆我把这篇范文贴上来吧，感觉确实写的很好，我好多词都是借签里面的，包括basilic,其实我的水平一般

范文如下：

提纲:
TS:反对将艺术家和批评家的作用强行分割，将功劳只归于艺术家
B1:让步，是艺术家创作了艺术作品，
例子：达芬奇，塞万提斯
B2:批评家的创造性批评对艺术品价值的发掘，以及价值增值功不可没
例子：《堂吉珂德》从一部闹剧变成具有历史.哲学深度的杰作,
是拜伦，海涅的功劳
B3:尤其对于现代艺术，批评家对艺术作品有关键性的作用
例子：布莱克，卡夫卡的作品是被批评家从尘堆中发掘出来的；
“野兽派”“立体派”的命名对这些作品特质的巨大影响，
今天，这些作品已和这些“标签”深深结合而不可分割
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the great role the critic plays in the discovery, introduction and refining of the value of the arts, I can not accept the view above at all. Rather than the unilateral perspective maybe some people take on, I would rather confirm and agree this point: it is critic in company with artist who gives our society something of lasting value, the division and preconception preconception of them in our judgment is not candid and sound indeed.

Undeniably, it is our artist, not critic, who gives birth to every art work. And just for their specialness of the born characteristic, eventually great art works were accepted by society as something of lasting value. Vinci created the " Mona Lisa ",of which the unique beauty and mystery will be an eternal topic for the people later . And nowadays, which we honor as a classics with great profundity of history and philosophy, the "Don Quixote", belongs to the creation of Saiwantisi. We owe them much gratitude for their precious presents for our spirit dinner.

However, it is just the more knowledge of the background of the "Don Quixote": how does it become so acceptable in history ?,that turns me to the more objective attitude I announced at the beginning. When the saga novel was published, it was considered no more than a farce at all. Nevertheless, about 100 years later, it had been praised as we evaluate today. From where was the great conversion stemming? One may say the conversion was attributed to the author,the creator of the character of the work.It is true indeed, however, there was another basilic cause hidden in history, and there was ,the critic. In fact, it should also be attributed to the critics who achieved the increment of the work, such as Byron and Heine. It was their creative critique that enriched the connotation of the work, which lead us a new reading reflection of Don Quixote's story distinct from the people's at Saimantisis time. Nowadays, what we see is no longer a buffoon with unrealistic fantasy, but a hero with advanced consciousness rejected by the society. And we do not rigidly adhere to the incredible plot of the story any more, we begin to realize it was the corruption of the society that made our hero with great character of faithfulness, integrity, and nobility a scoff by those people. Therefore, just as Oscar Wilde pointed out in his "Critics as Artists"(and I paraphrase): critique is crucial to art, for its understanding, its conversation, and its promotion of art.

Turn our view back to the modern art works we can touch in everyday life, we will find out that critique appears even more important to the forming of these work's value. In fact, sometimes the attention of the critic even became the ticket for a modern art work entering the door of history.The great work, such as the poems of William Blake, the novels of Franz Kafka, are all dug out from heavy dust by creative critique. As for Louis Vanxellls' labels of "fanvism" and "cubism", we can still tell how direct affection the unique naming had made during our evaluation of these works today. For the later people, the naming represents some intrinsic character of these works. In some way, the label has turned into the indiserptible part of the lasting value of such works.

Permit me to conclude my words as following way: it is the artist who gestates and gives birth to art; it is the critic who fosters art ,and endues the life of art with more meaning and value. From theirs hands, we acquire the rarity present of lasting value.

jingjingtousUID：2164820

对了，这篇范文我没有修改，如果有什么语法或句式方面的错误，大家帮忙指正一下