a wen [Daily writing]

wencheng2961188UID: 2826634

第一次来。以后大概2天来一次。感觉1天1篇完不成:L

9月6日独立

"The best way to improve the quality of education is to increase teachers' salaries'."

Education, in current periods, is a hot question. We can always hear people discuss how to improve the quality of education. Some people suggest that increase teachers' salary is the best way. However, in my perspective, I don't agree with them.

In some extent, raising teachers' salaries maybe enlarge the enthusiasm for their work. Such as make more preparation after class; be stricter to students. However, this enthusiasm usually last only a few months or even less, Because the salaries will not change no matter how they work. For most people, keeping enthusiasm needs ensuing incitement, but their salaries cannot keep rising. Once this incitement loses its effect, they will turn back as before.   

In addition, for most teachers, they are working hard even their salaries are not high enough. They do their best to prepare every class and keep ardent in all their classes. In this situation, increasing salaries only suit their effort but cannot improve their teaching ability which I think is the most important quality for a teacher. A teacher who has no teaching tricks and just read the book and write formulas on the blackboard, will not do better education even give him high salaries. If all the teachers are as skillful as Feyman, who is not only a celebrated physicist but also an excellent physics teacher, the quality of education will surely be improved a lot—just look at most of his elite students in the physics domain.   

For the reasons above, I think spend money for teachers' training is a better way than increasing their salaries.  Most teachers, such as in China, only have the knowledge they need, but they lack the ability to transmit them to students in an efficient way. Thus, some training for the teaching method or how to perform in classes  for those teachers to make their classes more attractive and their words more easily understood by students will do have a better effect in education.

All in all, in my perspective, only teachers' ability and method are optimized can the quality of education be improved. However, I don't mean I object raising teachers' salary, at least it should be worth   their sweat.

hanqiUID: 2313191

已改，

楼主和我的问题差不多，其实多数时候我们想把句子写漂亮，不一定要用大段长幅的复合句。简单的句子能把意思表达清楚的话也是一篇漂亮的文章。

samuelandcarolUID: 3161566

Education, in current periods (一个recently带过), is a hot question. We can（去掉） always hear people discussing how to improve the quality of education. Some people suggest that increasing teachers' salary is the best way. However, in my perspective, I agree（disagree） with them.

In some extent, raising teachers' salaries maybe enlarge the enthusiasm for their work. Such as make more preparation after（before） class; be stricter to students. However, this enthusiasm usually last only a few months or even less, because the salaries will not change no matter how they work（这个矛盾啊，牵头说涨薪还是能调动点热情，后头又说不管怎么工作薪水都不变…啥意思捏？）. For most people, keeping enthusiasm needs ensuing incitement, but their salaries cannot keep rising（be increased continually）. Once this incitement loses its effect（lose efficacy）, they will turn back（act） as before.

In addition, for most teachers, they are working hard even（although） their salaries are not high enough. They do their best to prepare every class and keep ardent in all their classes. In this situation, increasing salaries are only suit（suitable for） their effort but cannot improve their teaching ability which I think it is the most important quality for a teacher. A teacher who has no teaching tricks（skills） and just read （according to）the book and write formulas on the blackboard, will not do better education even（though） give him high salary. If all the teachers are as skillful as Feyman, who is not only a celebrated physicist but also an excellent physics teacher, the quality of education will surely be improved a lot（with a giant leap）—just look at most of his elite students in the physics domain.   

For the reasons above, I think spend money for teachers' training is a better way than increasing their salaries.  Most teachers, such as in China, only have the knowledge they need, but they（去掉） lack （of） the ability to transmit them to students in an efficient way. Thus, some training for the teaching method or how to perform in classes  for those teachers to make their classes more attractive and their words more easily understood by students will do have a better effect in education. （plays a better role in the education）

All in all, in my perspective, only teachers' ability and method are optimized which can improve the quality of education be improved（去掉）. However, I don't mean I object raising teachers' salary, at least it should be worth   their sweat.

wencheng2961188UID: 2826634

9月8日独立写作
20100130NADo you agree that the government should support the scientific researcheven there’s no practical use


In modern society, profits play a leader role in decisions of investment. Many scientific researches cannot get the financial support from government because they do not have practical use. In my perspective, however, I cannot agree with this government.

Some researches maybe not have practical use, but they have far-reaching meanings for human beings. Such as some domain in pure theory of physics, many scientists do experiments to certify the theory of relativity or to develop a model to calculate the age of the universe. They definitely cannot affect human's life, but they represent the development of mankind's civilization. Just because these researches which seem no practical use from the palace of science.  

In addition, just like we cannot work for profit all the time, we cannot make all people do research for practical use either. Some people born to do those theories researches. Hawking is a great example. We praise him and his theory, but it does really have no influence on our lives and no use for developing economy and strengthening the country. On the other hand, people who do the research of basic science are always the smartest man, and they are only interested in those things. If the government does not support them, those experiments devised by them, which may bring great achievement, cannot operate. It is a waste of talents, not only for the government but also for the world.

At last, many scientific researches have great potential value but cannot be recognized at first. Just like 300 years ago, who can tell what the value of the Newton's law of gravitation is. Why the moon moves around the earth, and what kind of interaction between two objects are surely had no value for man at that time, but they now play an important role in today's space exploring for human beings. It is the basement of how satellite gets into the sky and how space shuttle travels to the moon. Quantum mechanics was just developed explaining some unaccountable phenomenon of two physics experiments. However, in nowadays, our lives are filled with quantum mechanics. Semiconductor, whose widely using depends on this theory, can be taken as a good example.

All in all, in my opinion, no matter the scientific research has a practical use or not, government should support them. Human civilization is just developed by the science which is not useful for human at their first sight.

AriesVoiceUID: 2804212

UP

AriesVoiceUID: 2804212

支持楼主

AriesVoiceUID: 2804212

楼上同学改的很认真么

wencheng2961188UID: 2826634

7# AriesVoice

感觉挺好的。比自己给自己改认真。而且给别人改也提高的

sallyremyUID: 3120928

4# wencheng2961188

9月8日独立写作
20100130NADo you agree that the government should support the scientific researcheven there’s no practical use1 m) C+ R% v# I5 ^$ J4 ]( }5 v
3 ?+ b$ r4 \0 H0 P  J( D2 \& M3 q+ S

In modern society, profits play a leader role in decisions of investment. Many scientific researches cannot get the financial support from government because they do not have practical use. In my perspective, however, I cannot agree with this government. + V7 `2 I( T- A* e& _

Some researches maybe（may） not have practical use, but they have far-reaching meanings for human beings. Such as some domain(s) in pure theory of physics, many scientists do experiments to certify the theory of relativity or to develop a model to calculate the age of the universe. They definitely cannot affect human's life, but they represent the development of mankind's civilization. Just because these researches which seem（seem to have）no practical use from the palace of science.  (第一个观点跟我一样哦~~)

In addition, just like we cannot work for profit all the time, we cannot make all people do research for practical use either. Some people born to do those theories researches. Hawking is a great example. We praise him and his theory, but it does really have no influence on our lives and no use for developing economy and strengthening (换成flourishing更好)the country. On the other hand, people who do the research of basic science are always the smartest man, and they are only interested in those things. If the government does not support them, those experiments devised by them, which may bring great achievement, cannot (be operated)operate. It is a waste of talents, not only for the government but also for the world.

At last, many scientific researches have great potential value but cannot be recognized at first. Just like 300 years ago, who can tell what the value of the Newton's law of gravitation is. Why the moon moves around the earth, and what kind of interaction between two objects are surely had no value for man at that time(最后一句这样写容易引起歧义，三句话可以用such as 连), but they now play an important role in today's space exploring for human beings. It is the basement of how satellite gets into the sky and how space shuttle travels to the moon. Quantum mechanics was just developed explaining some unaccountable phenomenon of two physics experiments. However, in nowadays, our lives are filled with quantum mechanics. Semiconductor, whose widely using（usage） depends on this theory, can be taken as a good example.1 c' I* A" v; ~3 j9 [" [) Y9 C' i
; U# g5 }; P; w* D3 V4 M$ W6 L. N
All in all, in my opinion, no matter the scientific research has a practical use or not, government should support them. Human civilization is just developed by the science which is not useful for human at their first sight.

请记得帮我改作文，谢谢~
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=1304586&extra=

pjianetUID: 3039708

写的似乎不错，有点深

wencheng2961188UID: 2826634

9# sallyremy


咱俩不是一个组的。你应该少给其他人改了。
我一会改改你的

wq1102UID: 2962374

9月8日独立写作 已修改，佩服楼主啊`写的很好~
20100130NADo you agree that the government should support the scientific researcheven there’s no practical use
3 N; \! c% V2 _" [4 \  G  G- y- z; w, b* c6 e' Z
& d- Q$ ]- I( M9 t( n, a% l, |
In modern society, profits play a leader role in decisions of investment. Many scientific researches cannot get the financial support from government because they do not have practical use. In my perspective, however, I cannot agree with this governmentbehavior.
& }( }) w0 F$ Z/ Z; c. j7 ~7 h9 l5 Y  f% I7 m+ }2 }3 A- \& _4 V3 {" ?& w3 C
Some researches maybe not have practical use, but they have far-reaching meanings for human beings. Such as some domain in pure theory of physics, many scientists do experiments to certify the theory of relativity or to develop a model to calculate the age of the universe. They definitely cannot affect human's life, but they represent the development of mankind's civilization. Just because these researches which seem no practical use frorm the palace of science（不知道改完是不是作者想表达的意思）.  
. u& U+ @% S5 x, k: i5 {* |0 A. f( I* z8 G" W# W
In addition, just like we cannot work for profit all the time, we cannot make all people do research for practical use either. Some people are born to do those theories researches. Hawking is a great example. We praise him and his theory, but it does really have no influence on our lives and no use for developing economy and strengthening the country. On the other hand, people who do the research of basic science are always the smartest man, and they are only interested in those things. If the government does not support them, those experiments devised by them, which may bring great achievement, cannot operate. It is a waste of talents, not only for the government but also for the world." j4 _' r  E& g! F7 |
. B" v0 M" p6 L! H; [
At last（这里换个词会不会好些，感觉到这段就要结束了似的）, many scientific researches have great potential value but cannot be recognized at first. Just like 300 years ago, who can tell what the value of the Newton's law of gravitation is. Why the moon moves around the earth, and what kind of interaction between two objects are surely had no value for man at that time, but they now play an important role in today's space exploring for human beings. It is the basement of how satellite gets into the sky and how space shuttle travels to the moon. Quantum mechanics was just developed explaining some unaccountable phenomenon of two physics experiments. However, in nowadays, our lives are filled with quantum mechanics. Semiconductor, whose widely using depends on this theory, can be taken as a good example（例子用的很好，赞啊~）.
, p  j; \, P" ?; K0 ?) O' w! S) v# }+ l+ p3 l, X3 k9 x
All in all, in my opinion, no matter the scientific research has a practical use or not, government should support them. Human civilization is just developed by the science which is not useful for human at their first sight.

foreverendlessUID: 3134774

9.8 LZ写的很不错