如是ivy综合作文贴

如是_ivyUID: 2704554

120 test-3

大家狠批

The reading passage contends that the theory of the Moon formation which is the a piece of the Earth surface is questionable. But the lecture argues that those reasons and doubts are totally unreasonable.

The author sates that if the Moon is formed by a piece of the Earth surface in a huge impact, there should be the a giant impact mark one the surface of the Earth. While it is never found on the Earth. However, the speaker says that since the Moon formed billions of years ago, no matter how gaint the impact mark is, it would have disappeared during the changes of the Earth by the nature.

Accoring to the reading passage, the Moon is supposed to have the similar composition with the Earth, while we have never found any water on it. On the other hand, the professor in the listening argues that there have been the heat interior on the Moon, and its temprature is extreme high, so it is quite normal to not be able to find water on the Moon.

In the reading passage, the author believes that the Moon should have the similar density with the Earth, while it is much slower than the Earth. In contrast, the lecture holds the opposite oppinion and believes that since the Moon is formed by a piece of material from the surface of the Earth. And its density is quite different and lower from that in the core. Thus it can be explained that the Moon's density is lower than the Earth.

melody106UID: 2559573

The reading passage contends that the theory of the Moon formation which is the a piece of the Earth surface is questionable. But the lecture argues that those reasons and doubts are totally unreasonable.

The author sates that if the Moon is formed by a piece of the Earth surface in a huge impact, there should be the a giant impact mark one the surface of the Earth. While it is never found on the Earth. However, the speaker says that since the Moon formed billions of years ago, no matter how gaint the impact mark is, it would have disappeared during the changes of the Earth by the nature(仅用by the nature不能说明是自然的力量对地球表面进行了改变).
Accoring（according） to the reading passage, the Moon is supposed to have the similar composition with the Earth, while we have never found any water on it. On the other hand(这个连接词用这里不好，因为说的都是一方面的事，只是观点不同，换Contrary to this point), the professor in the listening argues that there have been the heat interior on the Moon(这半句讲不通), and its temprature is extreme(extremely ) high, so it is quite normal to not be able to find water on the Moon.

In the reading passage, the author believes that the Moon should have the similar density with the Earth, while（用了好几次while，换个词吧） it is much slower than the Earth. In contrast, the lecture holds the opposite oppinion and believes that since the Moon is formed by a piece of material from the surface of the Earth. And its density is quite different and lower from that in the core. Thus it can be explained that（why） the Moon's density is lower than the Earth.

如是_ivyUID: 2704554

Test4 - Integrated Writing 4

The readinh passage contends that the cause for the famous Tunguska explosion may be the swamp gas explosion instead of the asteroid explosion. But the lecture totally contradicts that kind of the idea and provide three reasons to prove its view.

The author sates that if Tunguska explosion was caused by the asteroid, there was supposed be some traces and explosion fragments at the impact sites. While none of them have been discovered. However, the speaker says that since the explosion happend in 1900s, whatever fragments the explosion left may be destroyed by the nature. If it happened in Canada and the scientists rushed there immediately, it is certain to find the fragments.

According to the reading passage, the huge crater which should have been caused by the impact on land  still have not  been found out yet. On the other hand, the professor in the listening argues that if the explosion happened above the ground, it would never left any craters on the land. So no craters are quite common.

In the reading passage, the author believes that the explosion must have occured close to the ground since Tunguska is a swampland extending to thounsands of kilometers. In the contrast, the lecture holds the opposite opinion and believes the huge fire resulted from the explosion didn't concentrate on the trace of it, and the single relics from the explosion also proved that it couldn't caused by the swamp gas explosion.

如是_ivyUID: 2704554

Test5 - Integrated Writing 5   听力觉得比上篇简单很多。阅读量也少了很多。大家狠批~~一直都不知道综合要咋写

The reading passage contends that prescribed fire may not be a reasonable way to protect forests and us from wild fires. But the lecture argues that any doubts of the prescribed fire totally make no sense.

The author sates that we can use other environmentally ways such as disking to avoid wild fire instead of prescribed burning, since it often realease too much smoke. However, the speaker says that prescribed burning is the powerful force for the natural change and can reduce the lost caused by wild fire. Because planned fire can control fire's new trends. It cannot be replaced by disking.

According to the reading passage, prescribed fire may be unpredictable and dangerous once beyond the control. While the professor in the listening argues that since experts for precribed fire has employed for a long time, it is quite safe. Experts will set planned fire according to the particular condition, such as when and where to set fire, how the weather and vegetation are like, and so forth.

In the reading passage, the author believes that prescribed fire will cost a lot of money. On the other hand, the lecture holds the opposite opinion and believes that compared to the lost and disaster caused by wild fire, the cost for prescribed fire has been relatively small. Just imagin the tragedy after the wildfire. Countless people will lose their home and family. They will be forced to leave their homeland. In contrast, prescribed fire can protect the forests and keep them safe and live happily.

paddyhyUID: 202095

The reading passage contends that prescribed fire may not be a reasonable way to protect forests and us from wild fires. But the lecture argues that any doubts of the prescribed fire totally make no sense。

第一段写得不错啊。。简洁, L- Z* z          巍峨且
9 X0 O# H$ y- O1 ]4 _' Z3 ]) `
The author states that we can use other environmentally ly不用加吧 ways such as disking to avoid wild fire instead of prescribed burning, since it often realease too much smoke. However, the speaker says that prescribed burning is the powerful force for the natural change and can reduce the lost caused by wild fire. Because planned fire can control fire's new trends. It cannot be replaced by disking.
这一段好像听力不是这么说的啊。。。建议查看文本。。不过写的还是挺好的
# S7 f6 h9 v1 m" J2 ?" Q- @' z' v8 b/ J( F
According to the reading passage, prescribed fire may be unpredictable and dangerous once beyond the control. While the professor in the listening argues that since experts for precribed fire has employed for a long time,听力中好像说的是这个手段用来很久了。。不是指人吧 it is quite safe. Experts will set planned fire according to the particular condition, such as when and where to set fire, how the weather and vegetation are like, and so forth.
# ]: h) b) S: S% |1 Q( v/ @" v! `9 d6 q3 ?. @" G
In the reading passage, the author believes that prescribed fire will cost a lot of money. On the other hand, the lecture holds the opposite opinion and believes that compared to the lost and disaster caused by wild fire, the cost for prescribed fire has been relatively small. Just imagin the tragedy after the wildfire. Countless people will lose their home and family. They will be forced to leave their homeland. In contrast, prescribed fire can protect the forests and keep them safe and live happily.
最后一段写的挺点对点的。。加油。。再听清楚一些就好了。。

karen_0315UID: 2590040

The reading passage contends that prescribed fire may not be a reasonable way to protect forests and us from wild fires. But the lecture argues that any doubts（any 后面加单数哦~） of the prescribed fire totally make（s） no sense.

The author sates（cites？） that we can use other environmentally ways such as disking to avoid wild fire instead of prescribed burning, since it often realease too much smoke. However, the speaker says that prescribed burning is the powerful force for the natural change and can reduce the lost caused by wild fire. Because planned fire can control fire's new trends. It cannot be replaced by disking.据说，听力内容要比reading的部分多，你现在是1：1，没有什么优势。并且，第一段反驳是讲的三个优点，即使没有具体说出来也应该把大概的提一下。

According to the reading passage, prescribed fire may be unpredictable and dangerous once beyond the control. While the professor in the listening argues that since experts（有吗？我没听出来还雇佣了专家） for precribed fire has employed for a long time, it is quite safe. Experts will set planned fire according to the particular condition, such as when and where to set fire, how the weather and vegetation are like, and so forth.

In the reading passage, the author believes that prescribed fire will cost a lot of money. On the other hand, the lecture holds the opposite opinion and believes that compared to the lost（loss） and disaster caused by wild fire, the cost for prescribed fire has been relatively small. Just imagin the tragedy after the wildfire. Countless people will lose their home and family. They will be forced to leave their homeland. In contrast, prescribed fire can protect the forests and keep them safe and live happily.

heqiang_1001UID: 2607349

Test4 - Integrated Writing 4!
The readinh（reading） passage contends that the cause for the famous Tunguska explosion may be the swamp gas explosion instead of the asteroid explosion. But the lecture totally contradicts that kind of the idea and provide three reasons to prove its view.

The author sates that if Tunguska explosion was caused by the asteroid, there was supposed be some traces and explosion fragments at the impact sites. While none of them have been discovered. However, the speaker says that since the explosion happend in 1900s, whatever fragments the explosion left may be destroyed by the nature. If it happened in Canada and the scientists rushed there immediately, it is certain to find the fragments. 没啥大问题，就是向你说的，那几个时间应该写上的。不过你改写的很好恩……我又在抄原文抄原文~~~

According to the reading passage, the huge crater which should have been caused by the impact on land  still have not  been found out yet. On the other hand, the professor in the listening argues that if the explosion happened above the ground, it would never left any craters on the land. So no craters are quite common. 这段我也混乱了，完全没听懂。给你贴个原文，它其实说的是这个意思……
（The asteroid did not have to crash into the Earth as an intact rock. When an asteroid or comet enters the Earth, it could explore in the lower atmosphere before hitting the ground. Under rapid heat and pressure, the space rock slammimg into the Earth could have explored into a huge fireball over Tunguska  ）

In the reading passage, the author believes that the explosion must have occured close to the ground since Tunguska is a swampland extending to thounsands of kilometers. In the contrast, the lecture holds the opposite opinion and believes the huge fire resulted from the explosion didn't concentrate on the trace of it, and the single relics from the explosion also proved that it couldn't caused by the swamp gas explosion.
我误导你了，呜呜，其实我写的那个吧，完全就是根据我笔记的个别单词再加上零星记忆编的……哎。我改不出来了，还是上原文。它说，如果是气体爆炸导致的话，The huge fireball（第二段里提到的） would concentrate on one spot  还有一个方面就是The traces of Tunguska has a epicenter of destruction

我错了……我也给你改的这么晚……因为我给忘了，而且这几天都没上寄托。刚搜你帖子，无意看到你的定位……很厉害了已经！武大的法律啊~~加油……

如是_ivyUID: 2704554

Test6 - Integrated Writing 6

According to the listening, the speaker rise the doubt about the opinion in the reading, that the transition from cottage industry to the factory industry in the result of technology advancement, stronger legal protection for private property and the desire to save the cost.

Firstly, the speaker argues that in the early industrial, some new inventions consisting of the steam engines are used by individuals. And the large scale of the application for new inventions in the factory happened later. Thus, it totally contradicts the idea that it is the advancements in technology that force the cotton production to move out of cottages and into fatoried, which is supported in the passage.

Secondly, the author believes that the stronger legal protection for private property stimulate more businessmen to invest in cotton factories, and made them replace the cottage in the final. However, in the lecture, the protection for private property also applied to cottages. So why businessmen just invested into factoried instead of cottages cannot be explained clearly just because of the legal development.

Thirdly, in the reading, running factoried for cotton production can reduce the cost and it drove people to gather to build fatories. In contrast, the speaker believes that it can never reduce the cost but increase the cost for production. Despite it actually can reduce the cost for transportation,  the owner has to buy the land, build the factory, hire supervisor ,pay for more workers and so forth. In fact, it increase the whole cost in return. Thus, how could people abandon the cottage to build the factory just for saving money?

如是_ivyUID: 2704554

Test6 - Integrated Writing 6

According to the listening, the speaker rise the doubt about the opinion in the reading, that the transition from cottage industry to the factory industry in the result of technology advancement, stronger legal protection for private property and the desire to save the cost.

Firstly, the speaker argues that in the early industrial, some new inventions consisting of the steam engines are used by individuals. And the large scale of the application for new inventions in the factory happened later. Thus, it totally contradicts the idea that it is the advancements in technology that force the cotton production to move out of cottages and into fatoried, which is supported in the passage.

Secondly, the author believes that the stronger legal protection for private property stimulate more businessmen to invest in cotton factories, and made them replace the cottage in the final. However, in the lecture, the protection for private property also applied to cottages. So why businessmen just invested into factoried instead of cottages cannot be explained clearly just because of the legal development.

Thirdly, in the reading, running factoried for cotton production can reduce the cost and it drove people to gather to build fatories. In contrast, the speaker believes that it can never reduce the cost but increase the cost for production. Despite it actually can reduce the cost for transportation,  the owner has to buy the land, build the factory, hire supervisor ,pay for more workers and so forth. In fact, it increase the whole cost in return. Thus, how could people abandon the cottage to build the factory just for saving money?

如是_ivyUID: 2704554

Test7 - Integrated Writing 7

According to the passage, the author quite worries about the sharp decline of the number of readers for American literature, and propose three main negative effects. However, the speaker totally disagree with that, and it just because modern people have more choices.

Firstly, the author argues that our society's ability to think may as a whole decline. Since literature provides people with good books which can develop our creativity. While, in the lecture, the speaker tells us that it just because more choices replace the traditional literature. And except for literature, numerous other kinds of ways can also stimulate people's creativity and broaden their horizons, such as the historical report and so on.

Secondly, the speaker believes that fewer people reading literature will not cause the decline of cultural level of the nation, but on the contrary will increase it. As the development of technology especially the electronic media, people can learn through cinema, television, radio and so forth instead of only through literature and books. So the worry of the author is absolutely unnecessary.

Finally, the speaker accknowledge that English literature is becoming marginal, which the author is concerned about. Nonetheless, the speaker hold the opinion that the one should be to blame is not readers but the writers. Just recall the books on the shelves in stores. Why fewer people are interested in them. The main reason is writers consider less about readers understanding for them. So it is common to cause English literature to be marginal.

heqiang_1001UID: 2607349

According to the listening, the speaker rise the doubt about the opinion in the reading, that the transition from cottage industry to the factory industry in the result of technology advancement, stronger legal protection for private property and the desire to save the cost.

Firstly, the speaker argues that in the early industrial, some new inventions consisting of the steam engines are used by individuals. And the large scale of the application for new inventions in the factory happened later. Thus, it totally contradicts the idea that it is the advancements in technology that force the cotton production to move out of cottages and into fatoried, which is supported in the passage. 这个里面听力我觉得差了一个点没有写。我记得是，大规模的工人劳动也推动了这种转变，并且这个时期是先于大机器时代的。但我觉得我说的也很模糊，好像没有表达清楚。
刚看到我那天写完自己改的：第一个观点漏掉了一个方面（这个咱俩都没有写到）：
Most available machines including steam engines, are still on the experimental stage. They could not be actually used to boost production.


Secondly, the author believes that the stronger legal protection for private property stimulate more businessmen to invest in cotton factories, and made them replace the cottage in the final. However, in the lecture, the protection for private property also applied to cottages. 怎么听力的关键句子就这一句，还貌似没有说什么So why businessmen just invested into factoried instead of cottages cannot be explained clearly just because of the legal development. 还是我觉得没有写到关键点上。教授举了荷兰的例子，说同样的法令（好像是）在欧洲也出现了，但那里并没有和美国一样的情况出现。因此……

Thirdly, in the reading, running factoried for cotton production can reduce the cost and it drove people to gather to build fatories. In contrast, the speaker believes that it can never reduce the cost but increase the cost for production. Despite it actually can reduce the cost for transportation,  the owner has to buy the land, build the factory, hire supervisor ,pay for more workers and so forth. In fact, it increase the whole cost in return. Thus, how could people abandon the cottage to build the factory just for saving money? 这段很不错呢！其实你听力也挺好的啊，那么多细节说那么快你也记全了。

模板的痕迹已经很淡了，还是加个结尾吧。别的问题我在文章里说了。如是加油！

如是_ivyUID: 2704554

Test8 - Integrated Writing 8

According to the passage, the author claims that as the growth of international trade, more and more importing species have a negative effect rather than a positive effect. However, the speaker in the lecture believes that the introduced species are totally innocent.

Firstly, the author proposes that the introduce species may destroy native secies and decrease of population of freshwater species such as frogs, salamanders in North American may be the best evidence. In contrast, the speaker sates that the introduced species do not always harm to the local environment by destroying native species. Meanwhile, the influence by the importing species isn't limited in native native species either. The reduction for the freshwater species may be due to other reasons, such as pollution and disease.

Secondly, in the reading, the author blames the importing species for breaking the ecological balance and take the crane toats in Florida as an example to prove it. While the speaker tells us that they are just an exception. In most circumstances, the importing species bring a lot of benefits instead. If their population is under control, it can help to improve the agriculture, to promote the research, to manage the environment better and so forth.

Finally, the lectrue believes that the introduced species will be the assistance for local economy instead of imposing their burden, which the author worries about in the passage. And the passage has ignored that those mesquites quickly become the common fire wood in the desert region in Africa, which help local people generate their economy a lot.

soarer0474UID: 2665789

According to the passage, the author claims that as the growth of international trade, more and more importing species have a negative effect rather than a positive effect. However, the speaker in the lecture believes that the introduced species are totally innocent.) A3 T% U9 F* \

Firstly, the author proposes that the introduced species may destroy native secies(specises) and decrease of population of freshwater species such as frogs, salamanders in North American may be the best evidence. In contrast, the speaker sates that the introduced species do not always harm to the local environment by destroying native species Meanwhile, the influence by the importing species isn't limited in native native species either. The reduction for the freshwater species may be due to other reasons, such as pollution and disease.

Secondly, in the reading, the author blames the importing species for breaking the ecological balance and take the crane toats in Florida as an example to prove it. While(应该归前一句吧) the speaker tells us that they are just an exception. In most circumstances,（加上lecture之类的不然让人以为是reading中说的） the importing species bring a lot of benefits instead. If their population is under control, it can help to improve the agriculture, to promote the research, to manage the environment better and so forth.

Finally, the lectrue（lecture）believes that the introduced species will be the assistance for local economy instead of imposing their burden, which the author worries about in the passage. And the passage has ignored that those mesquites quickly become the common fire wood in the desert region in Africa, which help local people generate their economy a lot.（这个还缺对于当地动物的好处）

整体很好，结构也不错，值得学习。