1.27 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
Nowadays, people's quality of life has been largely increased.Thus they pay more and more attention to improve their spiritual life and various entertainments.However governments should spend more money on airs or athletics? As for me, I firmly agree that governments should pay more money in support of arts.
To begin with, arts could make visceral impact on our senses, spirits and souls through various art forms such as novels, films, music and paintings. This impact could also be preserved for a long time. Shakespeare's Macbeth, for instance, teaches us that inordinate ambition is pernicious and it has already influenced generation to generation. The arts are didactic——they teach us. When we appreciate a film that is deeply moral, we see ourselves in the characters and we find the moral dilemma of the action to be representative of problems in all human relationships. It is government's duty to create a free and positive environment for more and more new works of art been created. And government should also play an important role in protecting a nation's distinct cultural traditions——its folk arts, crafts,customs and so on. All above are priceless treasure for the development of our human.
Admittedly, high development of athletics has its own merits. If governments invested more to build public fitness facilities, it brings great convenience for citizens to participate in athletics. However, It is not wise for government to spend too much money in support of some state-sponsored Olympic teams. Though it may bring shout-term benefits in some international sports competition, there is no more significance for improvements of citizens fitness. Tax revenue from citizens is the main capital source of governments. Thus governments should pay its funding for the benefits of most people.
To sum up, taking all the factors mentioned above, we may safely dram the conclusion that government should pay more money in support of arts. Investments for athletics are needed. While government should take a careful consideration on which aspects in athletics to spend their money. Arts are something that have lasting influences for everyone's life so that government should pay much attention to it.
Nowadays, people's quality of life has been largely increased improved.Thus they pay more and more attention to improve 前面改了 这里换个 自己想想their spiritual life and various entertainments.However governments should spend more money on airs or athletics?有问题 As for me, I firmly agree that governments should pay more money in support of arts.
To begin with, arts could make visceral impact on our senses, spirits and souls through various art前面说了art了 我觉得多余了 forms such as novels, films, music and paintings. This impact could also be preserved for a long time. Shakespeare's Macbeth, for instance, teaches us that inordinate ambition is pernicious and it has already influenced generation to generation. The arts are didactic——they teach us. When we appreciate a film that is deeply moral, we see ourselves in the characters and we find the moral dilemma of the action to be representative of problems in all human relationships. It is government's duty to create a free and positive environment for more and more new works of art been created. And government should also play an important role in protecting a nation's distinct 我觉得诡异 要不删 要不用original cultural traditions——its folk arts, crafts,customs and so on. All above are priceless treasure for the development of our human.
就一段论述么? 有 to begin with 起码还有个secondly 吧
Admittedly, high development of athletics has its own merits. If governments invested more to build public fitness facilities, it brings great convenience for citizens to participate in athletics. However, It is not wise for government to spend too much money in support of some state-sponsored Olympic teams. Though it may bring shout-term 什么意思 告诉我下benefits in some international sports competition, there is no more significance for improvements of citizens 是不是应该是所有格啊 fitness. Tax revenue from citizens is the main capital source of governments. Thus governments should pay its funding for the benefits of most people.
$ T( E6 g% J! n$ r, r* v
. O* x2 |0 s6 D) [& k& d0 J
To sum up, taking all the factors mentioned above, we may safely dram 拼写拼写~~~~~ the conclusion that government should pay more money in support of arts. Investments for athletics are needed. While government should take a careful consideration on which aspects in athletics to spend their money.while 我觉得突兀 难道是逗号写成句号? Arts are something that have lasting influences for everyone's life so that government should pay much attention to it.+ M8 R) M7 n) r
Nowadays, people's quality of life has been largely increased.Thus they pay more and more attention to improve their spiritual life and various entertainments.However(however作但是讲,后面接肯定句,另外,这里后面对前面来讲没有转折的意思,在这里有点chinese思维,把however换成whether习惯一点) governments should spend more money on airs or athletics? As for me, I firmly agree that governments should pay(这个pay不恰当,pay 和money一起用是说本来欠了钱,或是应该付的钱,pay这样的钱。) more money in support of arts.
r1 f! K6 L; l* Y/ n. p
To begin with, arts could make visceral impact on our senses, spirits and souls through various art forms such as novels, films, music and paintings. This impact could also be preserved for a long time. Shakespeare's Macbeth, for instance, teaches us that inordinate ambition is pernicious and it has already influenced generation to generation(我都不知道这个有名的道理,你真博学,崇拜!). The arts are didactic(这个词多含贬义,指教条的,好说教的,换个只含褒义的比较好)——they teach us. When we appreciate a film that is deeply moral, we see ourselves in the characters and we find the moral dilemma of the action to be representative of problems in all human relationships(深刻). It is government's duty to create a free and positive environment for more and more new works of art been created. And government should also play an important role in protecting a nation's distinct cultural traditions——its folk arts, crafts,customs and so on. All above are priceless treasure(好词) for the development of our human.+ v7 T) W3 R+ B
Admittedly, high development of athletics has its own merits. If governments invested more to build public fitness facilities, it brings great convenience for citizens to participate in athletics. However, It is not wise for government to spend too much money in support of some state-sponsored Olympic teams. Though it may bring shout-term benefits in some international sports competition, there is no more significance for improvements of citizens fitness. Tax revenue from citizens is the main capital source of governments. Thus governments should pay its funding for the benefits of most people.
L- d. \& V: M! H
To sum up, taking all the factors mentioned above, we may safely dram(你是想用draw吗?) the conclusion that government should pay more money in support of arts. Investments for athletics are needed. While government should take a careful consideration on which aspects in athletics to spend their money. Arts are something that have lasting influences for everyone's life (这句经典)so that government should pay much attention to it.- E$ }* g- F8 v+