- 最后登录
- 2011-1-12
- 在线时间
- 53 小时
- 寄托币
- 286
- 声望
- 1
- 注册时间
- 2009-1-6
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 20
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 211
- UID
- 2588704

- 声望
- 1
- 寄托币
- 286
- 注册时间
- 2009-1-6
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 20
|
I do not agree with the point of view that it is the best way tolearn about a foreign through the press. Though one (people) can learn a lot from newspapersand magazines, it is still not enough for one (us) to have a comprehensiveunderstanding for a foreign country or it’s (its) cultural. But behind the overall view of a foreign ( what is that mean ?), there are more (many) details that could not be expressed by the medians (media??).
First of all, if you want to know something, the best way toexplore is face by face. People could have a rational understandingabout a country for its condition by reading some articles about it, as we say,learning others experience, but one cannot have aperceptual acquire
(what isthat mean?). Some foreigns like China, such a big and complicated country (what is that mean?), have so many aspects, which could not easily been known forindirect contact. Such as Some foods, for example,, which
could not easily been expressed by language (what is that mean?), and even sometimes it those could, one still could not guarantee that he or she could knowhow the food tastes just by reading an article. As the same reason, visualexperience also could not been be known just by reading newspapers and magazines. We could notdeny how fantastic the technology of photographing has been developed, but whenyou actually saw some wanders, youjust could not feel the same way just by looking at a photograph. That’s why alot of people like to travel.
Otherwise, people have different performance when facing withdifferent situation. When a foreigner people faced with the press, one could only express a limited aspect about oneself (what is thatmean?). So when if you really want to know a foreign cultural, the best way might bejoin it, put yourself into (what is that mean?)
a foreign society,and then you could know the reason of the behavior of those foreign, and theirbackgrounds. Only through enough observe and analyze, could one know thecomprehensive facts about a foreign cultural. Compared with the way thatof only reading some articles, I thinkthe difference between them is like watching a show to living a really live.
What are you standing for? It’s not clear for your position.
(However, newspaper and magazine could give people some overallinformation as well. One could learn the politics, geography, fiancés and someother aspects about the foreign. Also, one could learn the foreign language byreading. But to learn a language, reading is not the whole thing. One shouldlearn how to write and listen, then practice with native speaker as often aspossible. It is the same reason why I insist that to learn about a foreign,only through newspaper and magazine is not the best way).0 T, h7 t (
To sum up, there is not a simple solution to learn a foreign well, notonly reading and not only traveling. One should find a way synthetically. Also,we should differ the solution of learn about the foreign by the motive. Basedon different reason one want to know the foreign, there are a variety ways. In that case, we could not easily decide whichparticular way could be definite as the best way. L-X, r. [) }) U5 j. l |
|