[TOEFL 2009上半年-Dark_Tournament写作组 ericsong1125第13次作业]

ericsong1125UID: 2493162

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Drivers should pay a fee to be allowed to drive on the city streets during the time when there is the greatest amount of traffic. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Modern life brings us not only incomparable living standard but also some inconvenience. Traffic jam is always the hot issue recently. Some people advise that drivers should pay fees to be allowed to drive on the city street during the time when there is the greatest amount of traffic. I am in the contrary angle.

Firstly, this kind of policy could not be fair in each democracy society. There is not an accurate standard for us to statics the number of vehicles in the jam time. The situation on the city street is dynamic that we could not definite the time when should be paid fee. Policy under no scientific theory support could be unfair. Moreover, driving on the streets is drivers' basic right which could not be valued by time. If this would do so, drivers who driving in the traffic jam would cost more than others. In the other words, charging for the amount of traffic is basically a restriction of individuals' freedom and absolutely the unequal policy.

Secondly, this kind of policy could not be functional even without concerning equality. Streets are the artery of each city. Streets to social development are what like water to fish. Charging fees should circumscribe people's actions, cities’ functions and social developments. Additional, this policy is not practical. For instance, vehicles out of heavy traffic are running co-instantaneously but it is not the cause of traffic jam that would not be charged. However, when it turns to heavy streets the driver should pay fees. Therefore, this complex regulation could not be achieved.

Thirdly, this kind of policy could not solve the problem of traffic jam which has resulted from amount of causes. More business districts concentrates in the same area is the direct reason. Even though cars are charged fees, drivers still need to work in this area. The same calendar is also a cause. Officers have the same working and resting time which should certainly lead to the lacking of traffic source and traffic jam. All in all, paying fees could not be the solution of these tough problems.

In conclusion, government could not solve traffic problem with charging fees method. To ameliorate the trafficable constructions and encourage drivers to carry the public traffics and restrict the new vehicles are all more effective than fees.

tp_ningchenUID: 2610155

Modern life brings us not only incomparable living standard but also some inconvenience. Traffic jam is always the hot issue recently. (always好像和recently有点矛盾）Some people advise that drivers should pay fees to be allowed to drive on the city street during the time when there is the greatest amount of traffic. I am in the contrary angle(这句我不太明白）.$ N) r1 {$ s" V- a# f2 O- B
. W0 h- A* m; I/ u! S' W
Firstly, this kind of policy could not be fair in each democracy society. There is not an accurate standard for us to statics the number of vehicles in the jam time. The situation on the city street is dynamic that we could not definite the time when should be paid fee. Policy under no scientific theory support could be unfair. Moreover, driving on the streets is drivers' basic right which could not be valued（是不是口语改成confined) by time. If this would do so, drivers who driving in the traffic jam would cost more than others. In the other words, charging for the amount of traffic is basically a restriction of individuals' freedom and absolutely the unequal policy.* Z2 @! c$ v+ `+ k9 t' z

Secondly, this kind of policy could not be functional even without concerning equality. Streets are the artery of each city. Streets to social development are what like water to fish. Charging fees should circumscribe people's actions, cities’ functions and social developments. Additional, this policy is not practical. For instance, vehicles out of heavy traffic are running co-instantaneously but it is not the cause of traffic jam that would not be charged. However, when it turns to heavy streets the driver should pay fees. Therefore, this complex regulation could not be achieved./ w  O& z; W* J# A/ e. v3 t
3 c0 h& ?6 E. D7 r7 V/ c, @
Thirdly, this kind of policy could not solve the problem of traffic jam which has resulted from amount of causes. More business districts concentrates in the same area is the direct reason. Even though cars are charged fees, drivers still need to work in this area. The same calendar is also a cause. Officers have the same working and resting time which should certainly lead to the lacking of traffic source and traffic jam. All in all, paying fees could not be the solution of these tough problems. $ G0 n$ r) p8 |8 p

In conclusion, government could not solve traffic problem with charging fees method. To ameliorate the trafficable constructions and encourage drivers to carry the public traffics and restrict the new vehicles are all more effective than fees.
哇！你的词汇和完全没有问题了，佩服！最好在长短句上再下点功夫哦:loveliness: