进军美利坚 9.24 by DK

DriftKingUID: 2664045

As the development of economy, people became more wealthy than the past, so they have more opportunities to go out side the city for their vacation. Someone recognize it is better to join in a team followed by a tour guide while others prefer to visit somewhere by themselves, which one is a better choice? I think it is depend on the objective where people plan to visit.

Take myself as an example, when I go to the famous historic spots, I would like to join in a team with a guide. Because s/he can tell me the history of this place, why people give this name to the temple, which great person have also went to there ... These stories are interesting. However, if people went to these places alone they can hard receive interest information.

On the other hand, if the place I want to visit is produced by nature, I would like to go without strangers. For reasons that there are some miracles where I would like to take a lot of pictures, and have a seat in order to feel the charm of the nature. A efficient schedule and pacific atmosphere is necessary at that time. That is to say, I want arrange the time by myself, I go when I want to go, stay when I need to stay, any introduction to me is unnecessary.

All in all, people should choose the right way for traveling which is depends on their destination . They need a tour guide to give them additional information about the human landscape which can hardly be received by themselves, and the guide could help them to make their journey more meaningful; to the opposite, a ciceroni is not necessary when people coming into the nature, they can arrange their time more efficient than the team which is a better way to feel the beauty of our nature.

我用的非常不被看好的结构。。。不过这就是我心里所想的，大家看看能不能被接受，不行了，就不能由着自己来了

sharamandeUID: 2597186

As the development of economy, people became more wealthy(wealthier) than the past, so they have more opportunities to go out side the city for their vacation(个人感觉这第一句不要也罢). Someone recognize it is better to join in a team followed by a tour guide while others prefer to visit somewhere by themselves, which one is a better choice? I think it is(不要is，depend是动词) depend on the objective where people plan to visit.

Take myself as an example, when I go to the famous historic spots, I would like to join in a team with a guide. Because s/he can tell me the history of this place, (加上个such as)why people give this name to the temple, which great person have also went to(不要to) there ... These stories are interesting. However, if people went to these places alone they can hard(ly) receive interest(ing) information.

On the other hand, if the place I want to visit is produced by nature, I would like to go without strangers(不如直接说by myself或者alone，这个表述容易有歧义，毕竟景点还有很多strangers). For reasons that there are some miracles where I would like to take a lot of pictures, and have a seat in order to feel the charm of the nature. A efficient schedule and pacific atmosphere is necessary at that time. That is to say, I want (to) arrange the time by myself, I go when I want to go, stay when I need to stay, any introduction to me is unnecessary.(不错)

All in all, people should choose the right way for traveling which is depends on their destination . They need a tour guide to give them additional information about the human landscape which can hardly be received by themselves, and the guide could help them to make their journey more meaningful; to the opposite(on the contrary), a ciceroni is not necessary when people coming into the nature, they can arrange their time more efficient than the team which is a better way to feel the beauty of our nature.
(个人挺欣赏你这种分情况的论述，但是感觉这些理由吧，不太正，比如说去人文景点，也有让你想照相的miracle，没有导游也可以自得其乐自己安排时间；自然景区也有有趣的传说，没有导游就不能知道。所以，我也不知道怎么样好，你再想想？我们可以站内讨论下):loveliness: