TPO9综合作文byξ↗丫頭‰〥

tiantian_raoUID: 2623283

The listening and reading passage have a conflict of opinion about the pros and cons of the practice of hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine.The reading material outlines its three major benefits,which are contradicted by the following lecture.
To begin with,the lecture claims that the hydrogen isn't easily accessible ,which rejects the content, hydrogen can be derived from varied sources. From the lecture,on one hand,water is not directly useful On the other hand , it is difficult to derive and store hydrogen.For example , it should be kept in very cold temperature so many high-tech equipments are required.
In addition,the lecture goes on to discuss the issue that fuel-cell engine cannot solve the pollution,which also conflict the point in the reading material.According to the lecture,it is true that cars don't release pollution by using hydrogen ,however,the fact is burning oil to generate hydrogen for cars can release much pollution.
Furthermore, the lecturer also oppose the writer's expectation by emphasizing that fuel-cell engine will cost more .On the contrary, about the same problem,the writer insists that the fuel-cell engine has twice efficiency than internal-combustion engine.In order to her perspective, the lecturer persuade us with the evidence that fuel-cell engine is more expensive due to it made in rare and expensive mental and cannot use the cheap mental so far.

shiwei83UID: 2680950

The listening and reading passage have a conflict of opinion about the pros and cons of the practice of hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine. The reading material outlines its three major benefits, which are contradicted by the following lecture.
To begin with, the lecture claims that the hydrogen isn't easily accessible ,which rejects the content, hydrogen can be derived from varied sources. From the lecture, on one hand, water (is not a directly source to produce liquid hydrogen)（删去 useful）. On the other hand , it is difficult to derive and store hydrogen. For example , it should be kept in very cold temperature so many high-tech equipments are required.
In addition, the lecture goes on to discuss the issue that fuel-cell engine cannot solve the pollution, which also conflict the point in the reading material. According to the lecture, it is true that cars don't release pollution by using hydrogen ,however, the fact is burning oil to generate hydrogen for cars can release much pollution(听力的意思是虽然氢燃料本身无污染，但是制备过程中会产生严重污染，并非你文中的意思).
Furthermore, the lecturer also oppose the writer's expectation by emphasizing that fuel-cell engine will cost more .On the contrary, about the same problem, the writer insists that the fuel-cell engine has twice efficiency than internal-combustion engine. In order to her perspective, the lecturer persuade us with the evidence that fuel-cell engine is more expensive due to it made in rare and expensive mental（metal, 下同） and cannot use the cheap mental so far.
条理很清楚，注意仔细把握听力细节，以免与听力原意产生偏差。当然，这都是瑕疵，其他各方面都已经很不错了。

lijr03UID: 2522963

The listening and reading passage have a conflict of opinion about the pros and cons of the practice of hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine.The reading material outlines its three major benefits,which are contradicted by the following lecture.
To begin with,the lecture claims that the hydrogen isn't (is not) easily accessible ,which rejects the content, hydrogen can be derived from varied sources. From the lecture,on one hand,water is not directly useful On the other hand , it is difficult to derive and store hydrogen.For example , it should be kept in very cold temperature so many high-tech equipments are required.
In addition,the lecture goes on to discuss the issue that fuel-cell engine cannot solve the pollution,which also conflict the point in the reading material.According to the lecture,it is true that cars don't release pollution by using hydrogen ,however,the fact is burning oil to generate hydrogen for cars (the procedure of producing hydrogen)can release much pollution.

Furthermore, the lecturer also oppose the writer's expectation by emphasizing that fuel-cell engine will cost more .On the contrary, about the same problem,the writer insists that the fuel-cell engine has twice efficiency than internal-combustion engine.In order to her perspective, the lecturer persuade us with the evidence that fuel-cell engine is more expensive due to it made in rare and expensive mental and cannot use the cheap mental so far. 总体写得很好

daboraUID: 2574809

The listening and reading passage have a conflict of opinion about the pros and cons of the practice of hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine.The reading material outlines好词，学习了，哈哈 its three major benefits,which are contradicted 考虑下refute是否更好呢by the following lecture.
    To begin with,the lecture claims that the hydrogen isn't easily accessible好词 ,which rejects the content, hydrogen can be derived from varied sources. From the lecture,on one hand,water is not directly useful On the other hand , it is difficult to derive and store hydrogen.For example , it should be kept in very cold 用low更好temperature so many high-tech equipments are 不需要required.
In addition,the lecture goes on to discuss the issue that fuel-cell engine cannot solve the pollution,which also conflict the point in the reading material.According to the lecture,it is true that cars don't release pollution by using hydrogen ,however,the fact is burning oil to generate hydrogen for cars which can release much pollution考虑下harmful gas.
  Furthermore, the lecturer also oppose the writer's expectation by emphasizing that fuel-cell engine will cost more .On the contrary, about the same problem,the writer insists that the fuel-cell engine has twice efficiency than internal-combustion engine.In order to verify her perspective, the lecturer persuade us with the evidence that fuel-cell engine is more expensive due to 注意用法哦it made in rare and expensive mental and cannot use the cheap mental so far.
这篇文章语法错误比前一篇错误少多了，内容基本都涵盖了，内容听力上有些小小偏差，不过总体说来写功还是不错，向你学习！

tiantian_raoUID: 2623283

TPO10
               The listening and reading passage have a conflict of opinion about how did the population of  sea otters decline rapidly. The reading material holds that the environmental pollution is the key reason,providing three points as evidences ,which are contradicted by the following lecture.
        To begin with ,the writer says that the chemical pollution in the water causes the declination.The lecturer claims that no one have found dead sea otters on beach can prove the reason is the predator rather than environmental pollution,which conflict the content mentioned in the article material.
        In addition,the lecturer goes on discuss the issue that orca has changed its diet,which also conflict the point the crca prefer to eat whale so it cannot be the key reason.According to the lecturer, more and more whales are disappear so that the orcas  
         Furthermore,the lecturer also oppose the writer's expectation by emphasizing that the uneven patten of otter decline is due to the location. On the contrary, about the same problem ,the writer insists that uneven environmental pollution along the coast cause this phenomenon.In order to demonstrate her opinion ,the lecturer persuades us with the evidence that the area the otter's population declined rapidly is the location where is accessible to orca.And the shallow area that ,which the orcas are too large too stand in ,remains stable.

happyfaith2008UID: 2709856

The listening and reading passage have a conflict of opinion about how did the population of  sea otters decline rapidly. The reading material holds that the environmental pollution is the key reason,providing three points as evidences ,which are contradicted by the following lecture.
      To begin with ,the writer says that the chemical pollution in the water causes（因为阅读中讲到sea otter 都是过去式，所以推荐我们在说到sea otter 时也用过去式） the declination.The lecturer claims that no one have found dead sea otters on beach（补上, wich can ） can prove the reason（这个有点没有说明什么什么的原因） is the predator rather than environmental pollution,which conflict（conflicts） the content mentioned in the article material.' }  \+ R. c/ }( A1 _
        In addition,the lecturer goes on discuss the issue that orca has changed its diet,which also conflict（conflicts） the point the crca prefer to eat whale so it cannot be the key reason.According to the lecturer, more and more whales are disappear(出现了两个动词) so that the orcas  (~~~~(>_<)~~~~ 这点我没听出来，我答错了)
       Furthermore,the lecturer also oppose（opposes） the writer's expectation by emphasizing that the uneven patten of otter decline is due to the location. On the contrary, about the same problem ,the writer insists that uneven environmental pollution along the coast cause this phenomenon.In order to demonstrate her opinion ,the lecturer persuades us with the evidence that the area the otter's population declined rapidly is the location where is accessible to orca.And the shallow area that ,which the orcas are too large too stand in ,remains stable.

丫头进步好大呀！基本上没有啥错误。就是注意一下第三人称单数的问题。:lol

tiantian_raoUID: 2623283

TPO11
        The listening and reading passage have a conflict about the pros and cons of the decline of reading .The reading material outlines its major negative effects, which are contradicted by the following lecture.
        To begin with,the lecture claims that there are still high-quality books in literature,which rejects the contents,readers are missing out on the benefits of literature mentioned in the reading material. From the lecture,there are also many high-quality books,such as history,science and so on in modern society.
        In addition,the lecturer goes on to discuss the issue that culture has changed into many more forms.,which also conflict the point that the decline of reading will make the level of culture lower.According to the lecture,culture involves not only novels and poems but also music,movie and so on.They can also express the culture.
Furthermore,the lecturer also opposes the writer's expectation by emphasizing that the reason of the decline is due to the authors rather than audiences.On the contrary, about the same problem ,the writers insists that there are fewer writers due to the lacking of audiences.In order to demonstrate her perspective,the lecturer persuade us with the evidence that many modern authors write the novel which are difficult to be understood.

daboraUID: 2574809

The listening and reading passage have a conflict about the pros and cons 用的好，向你学习了of the decline of reading .The reading material outlines its major negative effects, which are contradicted by the following lecture.
        To begin with,the lecture claims that there are still high-quality books in literature,which reject这个词用得让我很纠结s the contents,readers are missing out on the benefits of literature mentioned in the reading material. From the lecture,there are also many high-quality books,such as history,science and so on in modern society.
        In addition,the lecturer goes on to discuss the issue that culture has changed into many more forms.,which also conflict the point that the decline of reading will make the level of culture lower.According to the lecture,culture involves not only novels and poems but also music,movie and so on.They can also express the culture.
Furthermore,the lecturer also opposes the writer's expectation by emphasizing that the reason of the decline is due to the authors rather than z用的好，学习了audiences.On the contrary, about the same problem ,the writers insists that there are fewer writers due to the lacking of audiences.In order to demonstrate her perspective,the lecturer persuade us with the evidence that many modern authors write the novel which are difficult to be understood.
丫头的作文写得真不错，逻辑和语法没的说了，但是感觉内容上单薄了，字数还是增加点更好哈

tiantian_raoUID: 2623283

TPO12
               The listening and reading passage have a conflict of opinion about whether the teenage girl in the picture is Jane Austen.The reading passage holds the positive thought ,providing three points as evidence,which are contradicted by the following lecture.
        To begin with,the lecturer claims that the family member couldn't recognize her precise,,which rejects the content,Austen family itself endorses the girl in the portray is Austen.From the lecturer,it was 70 years after Auten dead in 1882,so that these family members never actually saw her.
        In addition,the lecturer goes on to discuss the issue that many family members looks alike,which also conflict the point that the girl must be Austen due to the sketch painted by her sisteris is similar to the girl.According to the lecture,Austen had a large family,so the girl can be her sisters or cousins who in teenager.What's more,there were evidences that the girl was a distant relative niece to Austen.
Furthermore ,the lecturer also oppose to the writer's expectation by emphasizing that the canvas painting was painted by William.On the contrary,about the same problem,the writer insists that the style of the painting is Ozais Humphrey and he was active in the period when Austen was teenage.In order to demonstrate her perspective,the lecturer persuades us with the evidence that the painting was painted on canvas and William didn't sell the canvas painting in London until when Austen was 27.So it can not be Austen.

happyfaith2008UID: 2709856

先占个座

happyfaith2008UID: 2709856

The listening and reading passage(passages) have a conflict of opinion about whether the teenage girl in the picture is Jane Austen.The reading passage holds the positive thought ,providing three points as evidence,which are contradicted by the following lecture.

To begin with,the lecturer claims that the family member couldn't recognize her precise,,which rejects the content,Austen family itself endorses the girl in the portray is Austen.From the lecturer,it was 70 years after Auten dead in 1882,so that these family members never actually saw her.

In addition,the lecturer goes on to discuss the issue that many family members looks（looked） alike,which also conflict(conflicts) the point that the girl must be Austen due to the sketch painted by her sisteris is similar to the girl.According to the lecture,Austen had a large family,so the girl can be her sisters or cousins who in teenager.What's more,there were evidences that the girl was a distant relative niece to Austen.

Furthermore ,the lecturer also oppose(opposes) to the writer's expectation by emphasizing that the canvas painting was painted by William.On the contrary,about the same problem,the writer insists that the style of the painting is Ozais Humphrey and he was active in the period when Austen was teenage.In order to demonstrate her perspective,the lecturer persuades us with the evidence that the painting was painted on canvas and William didn't sell the canvas painting in London until when Austen was 27.So it can not be Austen.

丫头的作文越写越好了。基本上没有什么错误了。呵呵！加油！

michael_beyondUID: 2704216

The listening and reading passage have a conflict of opinion about whether the teenage girl in the picture is Jane Austen.The reading passage holds the positive thought ,providing three points as evidence,which are contradicted by the following lecture.
+ H+ ^7 g  p5 U, N8 O% Z        To begin with,the lecturer claims that the family member couldn't recognize her precise,,which rejects the content,Austen family itself endorses the girl in the portray is Austen.From the lecturer,it was 70 years after Auten dead in 1882,so that these family members never actually saw her.
1 L! M9 R# X' r' e$ f" S; v        In addition,the lecturer goes on to discuss the issue that many family members looks alike,which also conflict the point that the girl must be Austen due to the sketch painted by her sisteris is similar to the girl.According to the lecture,Austen had a large family,so the girl can be her sisters or cousins who in teenager.What's more,there were evidences that the girl was a distant relative niece to Austen.4 g- t" l, {9 @8 l! W% Z
Furthermore ,the lecturer also oppose to the writer's expectation by emphasizing that the canvas painting was painted by William.On the contrary,about the same problem,the writer insists that the style of the painting is Ozais Humphrey and he was active in the period when Austen was teenages.In order to demonstrate her perspective,the lecturer persuades us with the evidence that the painting was painted on canvas and William didn't sell the canvas painting in London until when Austen was 27.So it can not be Austen.
丫头的作文真没的说哦，听力肯定也好的，向你学习啦。

6886liminUID: 2542415

The listening and reading passage have a conflict of opinion（个人觉得conflict是n 冲突所以of opinion 应该删除） about the pros and cons of the practice of hydrogen-based fuel-cell engines.The reading material outlines its three major benefits,which are contradicted by the following lecture.4 t2 w" L9 G1 D
To begin with,the lecture claims that the hydrogen isn't easily accessible ,which rejects the content, hydrogen can be derived from varied sources. From the lecture,on one hand,water is not directly useful On the other hand , it is difficult to derive and store hydrogen（我觉得好像是high purified water）.For example , it should be kept in very coldlow temperature so many high-tech equipments are required.: H6 x) q6 F: Z0 e, Z% p
In addition,the lecture goes on to discuss the issue that fuel-cell engine cannot solve the pollution,which also conflict the point in the reading material.According to the lecture,it is true that cars don't release pollution by using hydrogen ,however,the fact is burning oil to generate hydrogen（purifying water） for cars（hydrogen-based fuel cells） can release lots of pollutions much pollution.w. x! }1 d  V# M( a
Furthermore, the lecturer also oppose the writer's expectation by emphasizing that fuel-cell engine will cost more .On the contrary, about the same problem,the writer insists that the fuel-cell engine has twice efficiency than internal-combustion engine.In order to prove her perspective, the lecturer persuade us with the evidence that fuel-cell engine is more expensive due to it made in rare and expensive mental and cannot use the cheap mental so far. 不好意思 我是后进来的 T11 时 我们是一组 你们在做这篇文章的时候我还没加入呢  今天做了以后 给你改了一下  第二点我听的内容跟你的不太一致。文章结构很清晰。