2.9号大作文作业

yuminjiaUID: 2659628

People should not pay to the public transportation.

Concerning several superiorities of charging for public transportation, I agree with the statement that people should pay to the public transportation.

To begin with, it is indisputable that public transportation needs daily or monthly maintaining manually. In order to ensure all the daily public transportation safe, government should arrange professional engineers to do the checking and testing. However, such amounts of charge absolutely cannot be afforded by our government. Hence, we should compensate the output of our government by paying the transportation tickets. From a recent statistic report, our government appropriates about twenty percent revenue from other industries to support this maintaining fee. Nevertheless, it cannot satisfy the demands from regular maintaining. So, our government had to charge those fees from public. In this case, it makes sense for government to do so.

Furthermore, it is undoubted that if people could go out without paying for fees of transportation, the whole transportation in society would be disturbed. For example, in the public vocation, every person would prefer to choose airplane to reach their resorting spot, thus saving time in the vocation. If we don't need to pay for the air plane ticket, majority of people would rush into the airport. The capacity of flights could not afford so many passages, thus causing the disorder in the airport. Meanwhile, nobody would be willing to take bus to other vehicle, causing unbalance in the public transportations system. Therefore, we cannot imagine the disorders brought by paying nothing to public transportation.

Finally, I admit that sometimes the charge of some transportation, such as airplane, is too high for ordinary person to afford. Nevertheless, it doesn't mean that we could acclaim that it is no need for public to pay for tickets.
Meanwhile, the public transportation company is not run by government, but by profit organization. So it is reasonable for public transportation to charge different prices for public to earn its profit.

Judging from what I mentioned above, it is ridiculous to claim that people should not pay for public transportation. As I analyzed, we need a number of capital to do maintaining of public transportation .And charging suitable prices according to the distance and different kinds of transportation will keep our public transportation running regularly.

amanda_qinyyUID: 2632170

Concerning several superiorities of charging for public transportation, I agree with the statement that people should pay to the public transportation.开头太简单了点吧？

To begin with, it is indisputable that public transportation needs daily or monthly maintaining manually. In order to ensure all the daily public transportation safe（safe换个词来表达吧）, government should arrange professional engineers to do the checking and testing. However, such amounts of charge absolutely cannot be afforded by our government. Hence, we should compensate the output of our government by paying the transportation tickets. From a recent statistic report, our government appropriates about twenty percent revenue from other industries to support this maintaining fee. Nevertheless, it cannot satisfy the demands from regular maintaining. So, our government had to charge those fees from public. In this case, it makes sense for government to do so.不仅仅是维修方面，可以说的更多一点，如更换新的设备，提速，优质的服务等等。

SFurthermore, it is undoubted that if people could go out without paying for fees of transportation, the whole transportation in society would be disturbed. For example, in the public vocation, every person would prefer to choose airplane to reach their resorting spot, thus saving time in the vocation. If we don't need to pay for the air plane ticket, majority of people would rush into the airport. The capacity of flights could not afford so many passages, thus causing the disorder in the airport. Meanwhile, nobody would be willing to take bus to（or） other vehicle, causing unbalance in the public transportations system. Therefore, we cannot imagine the disorders brought by paying nothing to public transportation.

Finally(这里最好不用finally，因为你下面还有一段内容), I admit that sometimes the charge of some transportation, such as airplane, is too high for ordinary person to afford. Nevertheless, it doesn't mean that we could acclaim that it is no need for public to pay for tickets.Meanwhile, the public transportation company is not run by government, but by profit organization. So it is reasonable for public transportation to charge different prices for public to earn its profit.

Judging from what I mentioned above, it is ridiculous to claim that people should not pay for public transportation. As I analyzed, we need a number of capital to do maintaining of public transportation .And charging suitable prices according to the distance and different kinds of transportation will keep our public transportation running regularly.

文章里几乎没有什么拼写错误，一定是写完自己修改过，很好！
字数有400多吧，挺长的，但我觉得，文章里的两个观点及之后的例子，有点绕来绕去反复说的感觉，不够精炼，觉得有点凑字数的嫌疑。某个方面的观点，思维应该更开阔些，一段里的内容要更丰富才更有说明力。

yuminjiaUID: 2659628

1# yuminjia

People should not pay to the public transportation.

Concerning several superiorities of charging for public transportation, I agree with the statement that people should pay to the public transportation.

To begin with, it is indisputable that public transportation needs daily or monthly maintaining manually. In order to ensure all the daily public transportation safe, government should arrange professional engineers to check. However, such amounts of charge absolutely cannot be afforded by our government. Hence, we should compensate the output of our government by paying the transportation tickets. From a recent statistic report, our government appropriates about twenty percent of revenue from other industries to support this maintaining fee. Nevertheless, it cannot satisfy the demands from regular maintaining. So, our government has to charge this fee from public. In this case, it makes sense for government to do so.

Furthermore, it is undoubted that if people could go out without paying for  transportation fees, the whole transportation in society would be disturbed. For example, in the public vocation, every person would prefer to choose airplane to reach their resorting spot, thus saving time in the vocation. If we didn't need to pay for the air plane ticket, majority of people would rush into the airport. The capacity of flights could not afford so many passages, thus causing the disorder in the airport. Meanwhile, nobody would be willing to take bus or other vehicle, resulting unbalance in the public transportations system. Therefore, we cannot imagine the disorders brought by paying nothing to public transportation.

Finally, I admit that sometimes the charge of some transportation, such as airplane, is too high for ordinary person to afford. Nevertheless, it doesn't mean that we could claim that it is no need for public to pay for tickets.Since the public transportation company is not run by government, but operated by profit organization. So it is reasonable for public transportation to charge from public to earn its profit.

Judging from what I mentioned above, it is ridiculous to claim that people should not pay for public transportation. As I analyzed, we need appreciable capital to do maintaining of public transportation .In addition charging suitable prices according to the distance and different kinds of transportation will keep our public transportation running regularly.
重新修改了下

Amber0926UID: 2555355

Concerning several superiorities of charging for public transportation, I agree with the statement that people should pay to the public transportation.

To begin with, it is indisputable that public transportation needs daily or monthly maintaining manually. In order to ensure all the daily public transportation safe（safe确实有点笼统，可以说regular operation）, government should arrange professional engineers to do the去掉更好 checking and testing. However, such amounts of charge absolutely cannot be afforded by our（the） government. Hence, we should compensate the output（改为check） of our government by paying （for） the transportation tickets. From a recent statistic report, our government appropriates about twenty percent revenue from other industries to support this maintaining fee. Nevertheless, it (still) cannot satisfy the demands from regular maintaining （用maintenance）. So, our government had to charge those fees from public. In this case, it makes sense for government to do so.so和主题句离得太远，最好说明白people pay to。。。

Furthermore, it is undoubted that if people could去掉 go out without paying for fees of transportation, the whole transportation in society would be disturbed. For example, in the public vocation, every person would prefer to choose airplane to reach their resorting spot用destination好不？, thus saving time in the vocation这是职业的意思vacation假期. If we don't need to pay for the air plane ticket,（加the） majority of people would rush into the airport. The capacity of flights could not afford so many passagers, thus causing the disorder in the airport. Meanwhile, nobody would be willing to take bus to（or） other vehicles, causing unbalance in the public transportations system. Therefore, we cannot imagine the disorders brought by paying nothing to（最好free of charge in） public transportation.

2 [3 @% F  d' j/ V

Finally, I admit that sometimes the charge of some transportation, such as airplane, is too high for ordinary person to afford. Nevertheless, it doesn't mean that we could acclaim that it is no need for public to pay for tickets.Meanwhile, the public transportation company is not run by government, but by profit organization. So it is reasonable for public transportation to charge different prices for public to earn its profit.（这段写的好）

3 ]9 U$ R2 c3 d( _( P9 \# I
Judging from what I mentioned above, it is ridiculous to claim that people should not pay for public transportation. As I analyzed, we need a number of capital to do maintaining of public transportation .And charging suitable prices according to the distance and different kinds of transportation will keep our public transportation running regularly。

思路蛮清晰的，就是单词和句式有点单调，可能限时写作就想不到变化了。语法不错，没什么大问题，就是有的句子不是很native感觉是汉译英来的。哈，不过我写作也是菜鸟。。头疼啊，期待共同进步