【big fish】3月23日Issue43-by jjooyy

jjooyyUID: 2704028

TOPIC: ISSUE43 - "To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards."
WORDS: 383          TIME: 00:45:00          DATE: 2010/3/23 21:27:5

Is it really necessary for a public official to maintain the highest ethical and moral standeards? Could this lead to be an effective leader? From my perspective, a certain degree of high standards of morality and ethics is needed, with no necessity of the highest.

To begin with, an official without a high ethical and moral standard would lead the public to .  Further, a politics who does not establish whole morality and ethics and/or act against others' moral acceptance will gain little support from the masses. For instance, Bill Clinton, American president, who was involved in plenty of scandals finally found Americans turn their back on him. Although he did a good job during the presidency, his behaviours ran aflour people's expectation. Of course, he could not be seen as an effective leader. Therefore, without a high standard of morality and ethics, the public official cannot be trusted by the common people, resulting in less effectiveness under his or her leadership.

In addition, with high morality and ethics, the politic care about the nation and people, make decisions for them and spare no effors to serve them. Moral and ethical standards are the beacons that lead one towards integrity, goodwilling and . Under their guidance, one thinks more of others than oneself and concerns more about the country than the power he/she posesses. Franklin J. Roosevelt is one typical examples. During the Great Depression, he established a serious of policies and therefore prevented America from continuous depression. His effective effortsand concerns about people win himself nationwide admiration from people. Obviously, it is high morality and ethics enforce officials act for the sake of people and realize effetiveness by people's admiration.

However, on the other hand, the highest ethical and moral standards are not desirable, since too high standards would restrict what officials can do. Politics sometimes need to do something contraversial. if one is too righteous to conduct it, he/she may not fullfil the task. Take lying to the public for example. In some urgent situations, to conform the public and stablize the condition, telling lies are strategic and effective. But one cannot do that if he/she hold the highest moral standards and thus believes li. For that matter, a highest standard of right and wrong curbs the effectiveness of conducting policies, as one would only do what he believes is right.

In sum, in order to conduct effective policies, a public official should hold a relatively high moral and ethics standard, while without it, one would be untrustworthy and beyond it, one could not carry out  all of the effective policies.

计时还是没成功，而我也写得太少。。。

wowoyuweiweiUID: 2754055

Is it really necessary for a public official to maintain the highest ethical and moral standeards? Could this lead to be an effective leader? From my perspective, a certain degree of high standards of morality and ethics is needed, with no necessity of the highest.（你在后文之谈到了政治家，但是题目中的leader应该是各行各业的，如果之说政治倒也不妨，但是在你的首段就要明确指出你针对的是什么）

To begin with, an official without a high ethical and moral standard would lead the public to .  Further, a politics who does not establish whole morality and ethics and/or act against others' moral acceptance will gain little support from the masses. For instance, Bill Clinton, American president, who was involved in plenty of scandals finally found Americans turn their back on him（好！）. Although he did a good job during the presidency, his behaviours ran aflour people's expectation. Of course, he could not be seen as an effective leader. （读起来别扭点）Therefore, without a high standard of morality and ethics, the public official cannot be trusted by the common people, resulting in less effectiveness under his or her leadership.

In addition, with high morality and ethics, the politic care about the nation and people, make decisions for them and spare no efforts to serve them. Moral and ethical standards are the beacons that lead one towards integrity, goodwilling and . Under their guidance, one thinks more of others than oneself and concerns more about the country than the power he/she posesses. Franklin J. Roosevelt is one typical examples. During the Great Depression, he established a serious of policies and therefore prevented America from continuous depression. His effective effortsand concerns about people win himself nationwide admiration from people. Obviously, it is high morality and ethics enforce officials act for the sake of people and realize effetiveness by people's admiration.（论证的很贴切啊）

However, on the other hand, the highest ethical and moral standards are not desirable, since too high standards would restrict what officials can do. Politics sometimes need to do something contraversial. if one is too righteous to conduct it, he/she may not fullfil the task. Take lying to the public for example. In some urgent situations, to conform the public and stablize the condition, telling lies are strategic and effective. But one cannot do that if he/she hold the highest moral standards and thus believes li. For that matter, a highest standard of right and wrong curbs the effectiveness of conducting policies, as one would only do what he believes is right.

In sum, in order to conduct effective policies, a public official should hold a relatively high moral and ethics standard, while without it, one would be untrustworthy and beyond it, one could not carry out  all of the effective policies.

我觉得，你应该把什么是高道德定义出来。（我也有这个问题）
比如我就觉得克林顿的那件事就是没道德的表现，而不是高道德的问题。
这样子对你后面的论述会好点吧。
还有，时间不多了，字数还是多些好吧，加油啦：）