issue51 机经加高频 (492字) 请拍. 留链接~~~ 必回拍

Chloroplast923UID：207486

题目:
51"Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student.

提纲:
1.反对,同时作出界定,进行让步.
2.无可否认a.满足学生兴趣对于教育得成功很重要
               b.满足学生要求得教育可以使学生更快适应,从而学得更快.
3.然而a.没有教育能满足所有人得要求,要满足所有人要求是不现实且没效率的
         b.如果学生能随心所欲选择教育,社会可能很多人知识片面,也可能人才结构失衡(某些领域没人从事..)
4.总结

正文:

      In this society, some people think that only when education is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student, will it be truely effective. I don't agree with this opinion. To some degree, education specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student is effective. However, if this kind of education is over emphasized, it will lead the students to an uncorrect way, which does not fulfill the purpose of education effective.

    Admittedly, in our more than ten years' study lifes, we are all clear about the important role interests play in studying. With interests, we have strong motives to learn. With interests, we learn things more quickly. And, with interests, we can stick on the difficulties then conquer them. Many of the greatest scientists began their reserch life with interests of that specific subject, such as Darwin, Edison, and Einstein. Some people say, interest is the key to success. And many famous political leaders began their political lifes with the interests of social science, such as Bill Cliton, one of the most famous presidents of the United States.

    Moreover, whether one education can meet the individual needs of each student is one of the standards judging whether this education is effective. Because each student is unique, they have different needs of study. Somebody require the teacher teach methodicly, while somebody prefer a teaching flexibly. Education well designed to meet these needs may make the students accomodate quickly, so this education is effective in this consideration.

    Nevertheless, over emphasization on these aspects makes the design of education at loose ends. One thousand students may have one thousand requirements, however, there won't be any education in the world can satisfy these thousands of requirements at the same time. If we insist on this principle, meeting all the students' needs and interests, what we can do is to design one thousand projects. To commonsense, it is not practical and not effective.

    Furthermore, if the classes are set only according to the students' needs and interests, the students have the power to refuse to learn some subjects which they don't like while quite important to their studies. This can lead to a result that there are many students who only know the subjects and things they feel interested in. Another consequence of designing education plans specifically meet the individual needs and interests of each student is that there may be a lot of students learn some hot subjects, while the other less hot subjects lack people to study. This will lead to an unbalance social professional constrcuture. In this situation, the input of education don't produce people with ability effectively to the places where they are needed.

    In a word, in my opinion, the truely effective education is designed to meet the need of the society, and basic subjects of each unique field should be taught without exception. But students can alter their classes setting in minor aspects.

[ Last edited by Chloroplast923 on 2005-7-30 at 13:53 ]

Chloroplast923UID：207486

没人拍51吗?

这可是机经,还是高频啊~

Chloroplast923UID：207486

大家帮帮忙吧

落英UID：2116975

占　　座～

看了，
1很多拼写错误可以在word里面自己修改的
2有几句话是中式英语的　
in our more than ten years' study lifes,
With interests, we have strong motives to learn. With interests, we learn things more quickly.
Some people say
if the classes are set only according to the students' needs and interests　　　　　　
But students can alter their classes setting in minor aspects.
3从论证角度而言　我认为应该适当的曾加一点如果　非针对兴趣的教育　的实施所带来的好处

[ Last edited by 落英 on 2005-7-30 at 22:12 ]

kolu_renUID：158196

先占个座位，待改好了，再贴上来，大家共同讨论一下！

Chloroplast923UID：207486

先给大家道个谢了!!

有问题就一起讨论吧!

[ Last edited by Chloroplast923 on 2005-7-30 at 22:21 ]

Chloroplast923UID：207486

电脑前几天重装了一次,
现在装的word是简化版的...
没有检查语法错误的功能...
正愁呢~

那几句中式英语应该怎么表达呢?

[ Last edited by Chloroplast923 on 2005-7-30 at 22:22 ]

monkeydryUID：183691

我觉得条理很清晰,但是你的后面3个论点都没有比较充分的例子来支持,这样的论述就显得空泛了一点,其实可以把4个论点压缩成3个论点多一些例子来充实,也许这样会更好.

ouymUID：2109118

In this society, some people think that only when education is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student, will it be truely（truly） effective. I don't agree with this opinion. To some degree, education specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student is effective. However, if this kind of education is over emphasized, it will lead the students to an uncorrect(incorrect) way, which does not fulfill the purpose of education effective(effectively).

    Admittedly, in our more than ten years' study(school) lifes(lives), we are all clear about the important role interests play in studying. With interests, we have strong motives to learn. With interests, we learn things more quickly. And, with interests, we can stick on the difficulties then conquer them. Many of the greatest scientists began their reserch life with interests of(in?) that(their) specific subject, such as Darwin, Edison, and Einstein. Some people say, interest is the key to success. And many famous political leaders began their political lifes with the interests of social science, such as Bill Cliton, one of the most famous presidents of the United States.

    Moreover, whether one(去掉！) education can meet the individual needs of each student is one of the standards judging whether this education is effective（where comes from this standard?）. Because each student is unique, they have different needs of study. Somebody require the teacher teach methodicly, while somebody prefer a teaching flexibly. Education well designed to meet these needs may make the students accomodate quickly, so this education is effective in this consideration.

    Nevertheless, over emphasization on these aspects(指代不明！) makes the design of education at loose ends. One thousand students may have one thousand requirements, however, there won't be any education in the world can satisfy these thousands of requirements at the same time. If we insist on this principle, meeting all the students' needs and interests, what we can do is to design one thousand projects. To commonsense, it is not practical and not effective.

    Furthermore, if the classes are set only according to the students' needs and interests, the students have the power to refuse to learn some subjects which they don't like while quite important to their studies. This can lead to a result that there are many students who only know the subjects and things they feel interested in. Another consequence of designing education plans specifically meet the individual needs and interests of each student is that there may be a lot of students learn some hot subjects, while the other less hot subjects lack people to study（我以为这不是理由！）. This will lead to an unbalance social professional constrcuture. In this situation, the input of education don't produce people with ability effectively to the places where they are needed.

    In a word, in my opinion, the truely effective education is designed to meet the need of the society, and basic subjects of each unique field should be taught without exception. But students can alter their classes setting in minor aspects.

首先，小错误较多，建议楼主把文章放到word里改一下！
说理过多，例子太少！
我的链接，求互改！
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... ighlight=issue%2B51