issue157 求猛拍，就要考了，帮忙看看吧．互拍啊

vickycy6UID: 2107893

ISSUE157 : There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observations are subjective; they are always guided by the observer’s expectations or desires.

观点反对：１．让步陈述观点
２．对所谓subjective的解释
３．实验就是需要object
４．完全可以be objective
５．总结



After the publishing of the drama Hamlet which is the Shakespear’s magnum opus, there aroused a worldwide famous recommentation: one thousand different Hamlet for 1000 person. From this public statement, we may draw that different opinions are owned by different people even when they observe the same object. However, does this suggest that there exists no purely objective observation? In my view, these sorts of subjective “observations” are actually subjective “description” of the object. We have no firm foundation to conclude that all observations are subjective.  

The real definition of observation is often mistaken by our habit. For most people, they consider that what we think of an object is just the result of objective observation. Whilst such results are added by one’s own opinoin which based on his background inconciousely but delibratelly. So it can not be taken as a real objective asscessment. The different conclusions covered on us belied the same intierior attribute of the object. Take a glass of water of 30-degree for example, one who stays in the cold winter may take it as a suituable drink for warming himself, while the one who is during the torridity summer may argue that it is so hot to drink. The same glass of water gives different person diverse feeling. This is the subjective interpretation, not what we used to take as the objective observation. Such observation ones hold are their opinions under a certain circumstance, not what the real objective result of observing.

The objective result of observing depends on a series of proved truth or conception which can be accepted by everyone and can be used at anywhere, such as the temperture, time, color, the size of an object. Only based on such objective regulations can scientific reasearch go on. Studying in a laborary, a scientist in order to make his conclusion worthy comparing with others, he need to write down observations of the progress and the result in an absolutely objective way. How can he make it possible to be absolutely objective? A control is essential. The experience made now is just an improvement of the origenal one. Only compared with the control, the result can be scientific for scientist to predict new information.

The assertion harboured by many people that all observation are always guided by the observer’s expectations or desires is also a misconception. A recent survey published in IPRC(the Institution of Psychology Research Center) suggests that observation can be objective when people under the same cuicumstance. The experiment was conduct by the randomly selection of 50 persons from different areas. They were required to take acount of the same airtight room one by one. The result turned out to be that all the accounts are the same meaning. Such experiment showed us we can avoid the space for anyone to image or to add any his thought to his judgement even they have very distinct background. The so-called subjective observation are the inclination one used to put into observe things unconsciously.

Admittedly, human are the animal full of diverse affection, we are always adding our bias to describe a objection. But this can not be the foundation to assert that there is no purely objective observation. Only be objective towards the natural objection can our society and the field of science improve, also the evolution of human beings. Human beings should try our best to make objective observation.

conquer0824UID: 2102638

After the publishing of the drama Hamlet which is the Shakespear’s magnum opus（厉害，记住了）, there aroused（arised?好一些吧？） a worldwide famous recommentation: one thousand different Hamlet for 1000 person.（不错的引言） From this public statement, we may draw that different opinions are owned by different people even when they observe the same object. However, does this suggest that there exists no purely objective observation? In my view, these sorts of subjective “observations” are actually subjective “description” of the object. We have no firm foundation to conclude that all observations are subjective.  反对的观点啊，好像和我的思路差不多。继续看

The real definition of observation is often mistaken by our habit. For most people, they consider that what we think of an object is just the result of objective observation. Whilst such results are added by one’s own opinoin which based on his background inconciousely but delibratelly. So it can not be taken as a real objective asscessment. The different conclusions covered on us belied the same intierior attribute of the object. Take a glass of water of 30-degree for example, one who stays in the cold winter may take it as a suituable drink for warming himself, while the one who is during the torridity summer may argue that it is so hot to drink. The same glass of water gives different person diverse feeling. This is the subjective interpretation, not what we used to take as the objective observation. Such observation ones hold are their opinions under a certain circumstance, not what the real objective result of observing.感觉算是观察吗？例子不太准确吧？

The objective result of observing depends on a series of proved truth or conception which can be accepted by everyone and can be used at anywhere, such as the temperture, time, color, the size of an object.（怎么主体句没看懂？客观观察依赖于。。。怎么感觉偏题了？） Only based on such objective regulations can scientific reasearch go on. Studying in a laborary, a scientist in order to make his conclusion worthy comparing with others, he need to write down observations of the progress and the result in an absolutely objective way（这个例子也觉得不是很好，是以客观的观察来记录，但是每个人的观察都是一样的吗？先不说实验条件，观察本省就会有很大的差别啊，都觉得自己的是客观的）. How can he make it possible to be absolutely objective? A control is essential. The experience made now is just an improvement of the origenal one. Only compared with the control, the result can be scientific for scientist to predict new information. 没看懂这一端与主体有什么关系，试验需要客观没错，但观察是不是可观的呢？这是本体穆苏讨论的

The assertion harboured by many people that all observation are always guided by the observer’s expectations or desires is also a misconception. A recent survey published in IPRC(the Institution of Psychology Research Center) suggests that observation can be objective when people under the same cuicumstance. The experiment was conduct by the randomly selection of 50 persons from different areas. They were required to take acount of the same airtight room one by one. The result turned out to be that all the accounts are the same meaning. Such experiment showed us we can avoid the space for anyone to image or to add any his thought to his judgement even they have very distinct background. The so-called subjective observation are the inclination one used to put into observe things unconsciously. 举了一个试验，但是你的观点在哪里呢？觉得就好像拉出一个大人物来说就是他说的，观察是客观的，所以我们要相信，但是没有你的观点。你这个试验在阿狗里面太常见了，好多逻辑错误，很容易批倒

Admittedly, human are the animal full of diverse affection, we are always adding our bias to describe a objection. But this can not be the foundation to assert that there is no purely objective observation. Only be objective towards the natural objection can our society and the field of science improve, also the evolution of human beings. Human beings should try our best to make objective observation.
结尾好像在说可观的重要性，也有点偏离主体的意思

写得还可以了，不过觉得issue完全赞同或完全反对都不是很好鞋，最好还是中庸一下

批的有不对的地方还往海涵

vickycy6UID: 2107893

谢谢批改!不过在那个举实验例子的那一段,是要怎么写才好呢?要怎么样举例子才可信服呢?望指点