Argument2 寄托4人组 8月12日作业

meautoUID: 2116250

Argument2 The following appeared in a letter sent by a committee of homeowners from the Deerhaven Acres to all homeowners in Deerhaven Acres.
“ Several years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community’s yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average property values have tripled in Brookville. In order to raise property values in Deerhaven Acres, we should adopt our own set of restrictions on landscaping and house painting.”
1,DA的房价增长3倍后没有B市房价高，所以da市的成功没有参考价值。
2，da的地价上升有别的原因
3，两地情况有差异。

In this argument, the committee recommends that to raise property values homeowners in Deerhaven Acres (DA) should adopt restrictions on landscaping and house painting of their own. Based on the success of Brookville, however, this recommendation is logically unconvincing in several aspects.

To begin with, whether the success of Brookville deserves the attention of homeowners in DA is dubious. Although average property values have tripled in Brookville since seven years ago, it is still possible that their property values are far less than that of DA. Anyhow, the letter provides no specific data or statistics to compare property values of two communities. To go extreme, if the average property values in DA are as three or four times as that of Brookville, then there is no need for DA homeowners to follow whatever methods adopted by Brookville community to raise its property values.

Even assuming that the increase of Brookville’s property values is significantly worth the focus of DA homeowners, the restrictions on their home’s exterior appearance may accomplish nothing to the increase as the committee asserts. Besides the restrictions, however, there might be a myriad of factors equally attributable for Brookville’s increase in property values. Perhaps the government of Brookville has offered a series of tax privileges for business and industry, thus increasingly more companies are attracted to Brookville. Or perhaps more people favor living there because the improved transportation, health services, educational program in Brookville. Given each of these possibilities, the property values of Brookville may increase due to the large demand of land for stores, factories, or residence, rather than the restrictions on the appearance of houses.

Granted that it is the restrictions mentioned that account for the soaring property values in Brookville, the property values of DA might not necessarily increase even its community adopt similar restrictions. However, while the houses in Brookville may be regularly located with clear order, it might not the case for houses in DA community, characterized by careless arrangement. Hence, with restrictions the house in DA may fail to give us a pleasing appearance as it is supposed to be. In another word, what turn out to be useful in Brookville may not work out in DA. Second, it is entirely possible that people in DA consider houses with different exteriors as a sign of individuality, and any restrictions of landscaping and house painting may have a counterproductive impact on the current property values. In short, the recommended restrictions may not necessarily bring DA homeowners a surge in property values.

To sum up, this argument is limited and unsubstantiated in several ways. To make it more persuasive, we need a closer scrutiny on the relationship between the climbed property values and restrictions on the appearance of houses, and on the differences between the two communities’ housing arrangements as well.

哥哥家有二师兄UID: 2124390

占

哥哥家有二师兄UID: 2124390

Argument2 The following appeared in a letter sent by a committee of homeowners from the Deerhaven Acres to all homeowners in Deerhaven Acres.
“ Several years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community’s yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average property values have tripled in Brookville. In order to raise property values in Deerhaven Acres, we should adopt our own set of restrictions on landscaping and house painting.”
1,DA的房价增长3倍后没有B市房价高，所以da市的成功没有参考价值。
2，da的地价上升有别的原因
3，两地情况有差异。

In this argument, the committee recommends that to raise property values homeowners in Deerhaven Acres (DA)无主语 should adopt restrictions on landscaping and house painting of their own. Based on the success of Brookville, 前面的 才是 一个完整的句子however, this recommendation is logically unconvincing in several aspects.

To begin with, whether the success of Brookville deserves the attention of homeowners in DA is dubious. Although average property values have tripled in Brookville since seven years ago, it is still possible that their property values are far less lower than that of DA. Anyhow, the letter 犯了不该犯的语法错误provides no specific data or statistics to compare property values of two communities. To go extreme, if the average property values in DA are as three or four times as that of Brookville, then there is no need for DA homeowners to follow whatever methods adopted by Brookville community to raise its property values.

Even assuming that the increase of Brookville’s property values is significantly worth the focus不搭配 of DA homeowners, the restrictions on their home’s exterior appearance may accomplish 是否想说contribute? nothing to the increase as the committee asserts. Besides the restrictions, however, there might be a myriad of factors equally attributable for Brookville’s increase in property values. Perhaps the government of Brookville has offered a series of tax privileges for business and industry, thus increasingly more companies are attracted to Brookville. Or perhaps more people favor living there because the improved transportation, health services, educational program in Brookville. Given each of these possibilities, the property values of Brookville may increase due to the large demand of land for stores, factories, or residence, rather than the restrictions on the appearance of houses.这里these possibilities和后面的土地使用的增加好像没有什么逻辑联系

Granted that it is the restrictions mentioned that account for the soaring property values in Brookville, the property values of DA might not necessarily increase even its community adopt similar restrictions. However,删 while the houses in Brookville may be regularly located with clear order, it might not be the case for houses in DA community, 删characterized by careless arrangement. Hence, with restrictions the house in DA may fail sto give us a pleasing appearance as it is supposed to be. In another word, what turn out to be useful in Brookville may not work out in DA. Second, it is entirely possible that people in DA consider houses with different exteriors as a sign of individuality, and any restrictions of landscaping and house painting may have a counterproductive impact on the current property values. In short, the recommended restrictions may not necessarily bring DA homeowners a surge in property values.这里分析的不错

To sum up, this argument is limited and unsubstantiated in several waysaspects. To make it more persuasive, we need a closer scrutiny应该是作者提供吧 on the relationship between the climbed property values and restrictions on the appearance of houses, and on the differences between the two communities’ housing arrangements as well.

总体评论：感觉开头和结尾写的过于仓卒，犯了不少基本的错误。中间论述的很好

meautoUID: 2116250

:o
说的极是

meautoUID: 2116250

Given each of these possibilities, the property values of Brookville may increase due to the large demand of land for stores, factories, or residence, rather than the restrictions on the appearance of houses.这里these possibilities和后面的土地使用的增加好像没有什么逻辑联系

这个不明白