- 最后登录
- 2008-7-20
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 918
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-8-12
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 86
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 801
- UID
- 2127136

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 918
- 注册时间
- 2005-8-12
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 86
|
Has the video camera replaced the dominion of paper records in the realm of documentation and has taken us into the era of video recoding? I am quite suspicious about the speaker's perspective. In my opinion, the video camera does play an important role and has brought in pleasant innovation to our recording method, but to assert that the accomplishment of "replacement" is much too early, the speaker's words are overstated.
Admittedly, seldom is there people who disagree with the importance of the video camera-- the convenience it is offering and the profound innovation it is leading in the field of documentation. Thanks to the new technology, instead of we could only write on the paper our experience, important events, and the words to our friends and relatives, now we have a definitely superior way of documentation. There is several predominance of the video camera: Firstly, it is recording purely the truth. Watching the video copy of an important meeting, we can listen to every speech from each advocator, watch the slightest expressions on their faces without a single neglect of a detail that could possibly be important as a matter of fact, which could be absent in a paper records of the meeting. Thus, the thorough objective records eliminate the subjective elements of the recorder that could undermine the objectivity and credibility of the documentation. Moreover, video-recorder has a stronger capability to reserve a more lively and impressive information than the paper works. For example, the video that records your daily life in New York city(City可省吧) might greatly amused and placate your parents in California than a few pieces of paper letter with lines of routine regards on it.
Nevertheless, to make a conclusion that video camera had replaced the dominion of paper recording is evidentially invalid and experientially unconvincing. In our daily life, paper and pens are still serving the majority of people. There are several reasons: Firstly, some technological barriers are still waited to be broke. For example, A piece of CD can only carry the information of video copy of 50 minutes long, which means it is still inconvenient to take significant amount of information recorded by video camera, and the limitation of transportation speed through internet does not allow too much information recorded by camera transported freely through among people around the world. Secondly, it took time to expand through the majority of residents because the expense of video camera is much higher than the paper and pens. More and more people are likely to afford the cost of the devices only by the gradually economic growth of our society. Last but not least, myriad of people still have a deep emotion to the traditional way of recording, which could only be settled by the pass of time and the alteration of generations. In other words, it takes time to be done.
Despite that, it is safe to say that the modern method of documentation is having a brilliant future and a pleasing development, and we are quite looking forward to the day when video camera or other modern recording method act as the main form of documentation, which would not only greatly ameliorate the quality of the documentation but also that of our life.
呵呵!都拍不出来了,只有一个字:强!论证、语言都很不错,字数足够了,从所看到的范文来看,应该至少5分吧,当然,小虾说话没楼上有分量的。 |
|