isse172 trhths begin as outrages (欢迎大家拍砖~~)

BerlinbearUID：207694

Thesis: Although human beings will accept truth ultimately due to thier intelligence, people are prone to resist the coming of the verity.

Reasons: 1. The truth is always apt to break the route of the society so that publics easily frightened about the concussion.
         2. For the reason that numerous new truth can turn out that the theories held by some authorities are mistakes rather than verity, authorities would persecute persons who persist in the truth.
         3. Yet, human beings are full of intelligence so as to the truth will be acknowledged through practices.



Truth, which includes the certain concerning any matter or subject or the real state of things fact, represents the verity of the nature. With the development of the technology and the perceivable ability of human beings, it is common that more and more new truth of the world has been found. As the speaker contends, when the important truth attacking upon the widely acknowledged wisdom of the time is discovered at the beginning, it would always rage piques, or at least uncomfortable. On balance, however, standing on a historic perspective, I concede that the opinion of the arguer seems to be too simple to accept.

As a threshold matter, it is common that the findings of new truth usually attack the route on which publics already get accustomed to cognize the surrounding and absorb the existing knowledge. There is no doubt that the concussion of some widely adopted phenomena easily causes people's panic. Accordingly, persons are prone to maintain what they already accepted rather than welcome the coming of new truth.     
History is fraught with examples of the rejection to the new born verity. In Bruno's era, many people believed that the earth was the center of the universe. But Bruno claimed that the universe is infinite, which outrages the religious community, and Bruno was sentenced to death eventually. In addition, the idea that the universe had a specific time of origin held by Stephen Hawking, the most famous physicist in history, has been philosophically resisted by some very distinguished scientists. This illustrates the point that convincing publics to acknowledge new truth would experience a tough period and endure large numbers of unpredicted hardness.

What is more, it is some authorities of the time that prevent new truth from developing because of the protecting of their own interests and reputations. For the sake of controlling the social thinking, people who are in charge of the society, such as some religion communities hundreds of years ago, are intend to shape the whole nation to think in their designed rules. Thereby, if there any one tries to break the mode, he/she would definitely be persecuted. One apt examples of the point is about Darwin, the founder of the theory of evolution. When Darwin published his famous On the Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection, members of the religious community, as well as some scientific peers, were outraged and protested. And consider Galileo, the first person to use telescope to study the skies, found out that the earth revolved around the sun from his observation, and his belief was strongly entrenched in the doctrines of Catholic Church and so radical that he was forced to his rest life under house arrested. Obviously, in the are of science and other realms, defining new finding verity as "heresy" exists in almost every period of time. Thus, there is no denying that important truths begin as at least uncomfortable of the social authorities and tend to be prohibited fiercely.

Admittedly, it is exactly that human beings have an access to thinking critically so as to by considering the downside from their wrong notions, there will be no more difficult to admit the new significant truths. Let us talk about Darwin once more, through a phase of science proven, his idea was ultimately accepted and had drastically changed our perception pf the world and of our place in it. All in all, undergoing the proceeding of the verity's growth, truths will dominant the world.

In the final analysis, bringing forward the truth needs encourage and realizing then adopting verity needs wisdom. While based on the intelligence human beings would finally admit the truth, but in accordance with the human nature, it is not amiable to give a warm embrace to the truth at the time it comes.   

未限时，欢迎大家猛拍，小女子不胜感激！~~

sallyxinduUID：2131253

Thesis: Although human beings will accept truth ultimately due to thier intelligence, people are prone to resist the coming of the verity.

Reasons: 1. The truth is always apt to break the route of the society so that publics easily frightened about the concussion.
         2. For the reason that numerous new truth truths can turn out that the theories held by some authorities are mistakes rather than verity,verities(这个词一般用复数） authorities would persecute persons who persist in the truth.
         3. Yet, human beings are full of intelligence so as to the truth will be acknowledged through practices.这句话的句子结构很老练，不错！！
提纲很清晰，逻辑性很强

Truth, which includes the certain concerning any matter or subject or the real state of thingsthings' fact, represents the verity of the nature. With the development of the technology and the perceivable ability of human beings, it is common that more and more new truth用复数，因为前面有more of the world has been found. As the speaker contends, when the important truth attacking upon the widely acknowledged wisdom of the time is discovered at the beginning, it would always rage rage是不及物动词，rage against sb的意思是向某人发脾气，我想这里用个引起的词语更恰当． piques, or at least uncomfortable　和前面pique并列用名词. On balance, however, standing on a historic perspective, I concede that the opinion of the arguer seems to be too simple to accept.

As a threshold matter, it is common that the findings of new truth usually attack the route on which publics already get accustomed to cognize the surrounding and absorb the existing knowledge. There is no doubt that the concussion of some widely adopted phenomena easily causes people's panic. Accordingly, persons are prone to maintain what they already加个have吧 accepted rather than welcome the coming of new truth.   

History is fraught with examples of the rejection to the new born verity复数. In Bruno's era, many people believed that the earth was the center of the universe. But Bruno claimed that the universe is infinite, which outrages the religious community, and Bruno was sentenced to death eventually. In addition, the idea that the universe had a specific time of origin held by Stephen Hawking, the most famous physicist in history, has been philosophically resisted by some very distinguished scientists. This illustrates the point that convincing publics to acknowledge new truth would experience a tough period and endure large numbers of unpredicted hardness.

What is more, it is some authorities of the time that prevent new truth from developing because of the protecting　protection，有名词最好不用动名词 of their own interests and reputations. For the sake of controlling the social thinking, people who are in charge of the society, such as some religion communities hundreds of years ago, are intend to shape the whole nation to think in their designed rules. Thereby, if there any one tries to break the mode, he/she would definitely be persecuted. One apt examples of the point is about Darwin, the founder of the theory of evolution. When Darwin published his famous On the Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection, members of the religious community, as well as some scientific peers, were outraged and protested. And consider Galileo, the first person to use telescope to study the skies, found out that the earth revolved around the sun from his observation, and his belief was strongly entrenched in the doctrines of Catholic Church and so radical that he was forced to his rest life under house arrested.想表达Galileo的观点是顽固偏激的天主教信仰，所以他的后半生在监禁中度过？如果是这个意思的话我觉得前面不要用and吧，就是his belief前面．但不明白你要表达的是不是这个意思．看了回复我哈 Obviously, in the are什么意思啊 of science and other realms, defining new finding verity as "heresy" exists in almost every period of time. Thus, there is no denying that important truths begin as at least uncomfortable of the social authorities and tend to be prohibited fiercely.

Admittedly, it is exactly用形容词 that human beings have an access to thinking critically so as to by considering the downside from their wrong notions, there will be no more difficult to admit the new significant truths. Let us talk about Darwin once more, through a phase of science proven, his idea was ultimately accepted and had drastically changed our perception pf the world and of our place in it. All in all, undergoing the proceeding of the verity's growth, truths will dominant the world.

In the final analysis, bringing forward the truth needs encourage and realizing then adopting verity needs wisdom. While based on the intelligence human beings would finally admit the truth, but in accordance with the human nature, it is not amiable amiable 一般是形容人啊to give a warm embrace to the truth at the time it comes.  

总的来说已经很好了．有点小错误都是可以避免的，文章条理很清晰．有说服力，have a good command of English.
我把例子用红色表示出来了，你收集起来这个ＩＳＳＵＥ完了汇总用．下次你这个组长来汇总例子哈．（压榨天使了，:lol）