寄托天下
查看: 1141|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] issue4 教育类高频,欢迎大家来拍,必回拍,谢谢 [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
1719
注册时间
2005-4-18
精华
1
帖子
1
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2006-1-17 00:45:37 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
ISSUE教育类 总频率35
4"No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."
不同意: 科学研究领域之间是可以相互促进的,但是其它领域的知识经验不是一个领域研究取得巨大进步的唯一条件。
1. 不可否认,现代科学研究是相互联系的,而且outsider能提供新思路,新视角有助于发展
2. 但是某些研究领域,特别是纯理论研究,取得进步是源于自身的研究和创造

It is an inevitably trend that various disciplines interact and share the fruits in modern society. For one field of study, the knowledge and experience from extrinsic realms redound to its development greatly. However, the assertion that significant advance of any field is merely based on the outsider’s knowledge and experience exaggerates the function of foreign factors.  

Admittedly, everything in the universe is comprehensively related. So do the scientific realms. According to authoritative information, about 85 percentage of scientific fruits are based on or share other experts’ research results. Especially, certain basic disciplines, such as math or physics, play a crucial role in the process of other realms. Without such mathematic theory or physical tool, few fields could advance continuously. And the even worse, scientist, who major in one field perennially, might focus on the problem and limited by the wonted thinking mode. Concentrating on a narrow horizon often results in the failure. Under such a circumstance, the fresh air of outsider might be just a catalyst insiders need indeed. The experts from outsider can bring forward novel perspective to the same problem, which might turn out to be a good idea or the solution. Numerous outsiders impulse the advance of one field significantly. John Nash, the winner of Noble in economics in 1994, is an exact example for this point. He showed great talent in math and received the doctor degree from Princeton University. Relying on his deep knowledge of math, Nah bring forward a paramount economic theory which bring the Noble to him. It is possible that one discipline sheds some light on others, in a not dissimilar way, one field of study could accelerate the step by resorting on the outsiders who bring theirs knowledge and experience.

While, if we cast a look back at the history of science, we should not lose the sight of fact that the extrinsic factor is not the only impetus to the development of study. The endeavor of insiders cannot be neglected.  It is obvious that experts in their fields have made great efforts in researching it for a long period, and in turn, they not only have acquainted themselves with the history of this research, but also have the ability to forecast the future. On the contrary, since lacking of systemic and integrated knowledge of this field, outsiders only provide some sporadic sparkle or original idea, which cannot drive this field to gain significant advance. As a matter of fact, a part of disciplines, such as pure theory research, must depend on the effort of themselves, rather than outsiders, to promote the advance. For example, Chen Jingrun was an illustrious mathematician, who resolved one problem of Goldbach’s conjecture. He lived in an only six square meter house, what he had were a pen and a lamp except his enthusiasm and genius. Just under such wretched conditions, he gained tremendous achievement after consuming several sack of paper for computing, American mathematician A weil said that Chen Jingrun just likes a lonely alpinist climbing the Himalayas peak.  

In most case, besides the endeavor of insiders and the fresh air of outsider, there are still numerous factors which influence on the advance of one field, such as the completed results of former research, the sufficient founds, proper tentative strategy and acumen leader. Therefore, scholars should make good use of current advantage condition to research deep down their fields and absorb the novel idea from outsiders to impel the development of field greatly.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
0
寄托币
3826
注册时间
2005-8-22
精华
2
帖子
11
沙发
发表于 2006-1-17 13:25:18 |只看该作者
4"No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."
不同意: 科学研究领域之间是可以相互促进的,但是其它领域的知识经验不是一个领域研究取得巨大进步的唯一条件。
1. 不可否认,现代科学研究是相互联系的,而且outsider能提供新思路,新视角有助于发展
2. 但是某些研究领域,特别是纯理论研究,取得进步是源于自身的研究和创造

It is an inevitably形容词 trend that various disciplines interact and share the fruits in modern society. For onesome fields of study, the knowledge and experience from extrinsic realms redound to its development greatly. However, the assertion that significant advance of any field is merely based on the outsider’s knowledge and experience exaggerates the function of foreign factors.  
开头简短有力,

Admittedly, everything in the universe is comprehensively[/u]inextricably related to each other. So do the scientific realms. According to authoritative information, about 85 percentage of scientific fruits are based on or share other experts’ research results. Especially, certain basic disciplines, such as math or physics, play a crucial role in the process development of other realms. Without such mathematic theory or physical tool, few fields could advance continuously. And the even worse, scientist, who major in one field perennially, might focus on the problem and thus get limited by the wonted thinking mode. Concentrating on a narrow horizon often results in the failure. Under such a circumstance, the fresh air很生动 of outsider might be just a catalyst insiders need indeed. The experts from outsider can bring forward novel perspective to the same problem, which might turn out to be a good idea or the solution. Numerous outsiders impulse the advance of one field significantly. John Nash, the winner of Noble in economics in 1994, is an exact example for this point. He showed great talent in math and received the doctor degree from Princeton University. Relying on his deep knowledge of math, Nah bring forward a paramount economic theory which bring the Noble to him.wins him the noble prize It is possible that one discipline sheds some light on others, in a not dissimilar way, one field of study could accelerate the step by resorting on the outsiders who bring theirs knowledge and experience.这句似乎和前面重复了

While,这词最好不要用来打头,nevertheless if we cast a look back at the history of science, we should not lose the sight of fact that the extrinsic factor is not the only impetus to the development of study. The endeavor of insiders cannot be neglected.  It is obvious that experts in their fields have made great efforts in researching itresearch for a long period, and in turn, they not only have acquainted themselves with the history of this research, but also have the ability to forecast the future. On the contrary, since lacking of systemic and integrated knowledge of this field, outsiders only provide some sporadic sparkle or original idea, which cannot drive this field to gain significant advance.这段你主要在讲单独专业的重要性,这里引出的这个转折防在这里不太合适 As a matter of fact, a part of disciplines, such as pure theory research, must depend on the effort of themselves, rather than outsiders, to promote the advance.这个句子引如的插入语不厂,不用逗号分开的 For example, Chen Jingrun was an illustrious mathematician, who resolved one problem of Goldbach’s conjecture. He lived in an only six square meter house, what he had were a pen and a lamp except his enthusiasm and genius. 对这个例子的描述的重点防在了研究条件艰苦简陋,我认为重点应该防到他的研究是独立学科,这样才能更贴近主题Just under such wretched conditions, he gained tremendous achievement after consuming? several sacks of paper for computing, American mathematician A weil said that Chen Jingrun just likes a lonely alpinist climbing the Himalayas peak. 最后一句是最有力的,非常好,狂赞~~~!!
In most case, besides the endeavor of insiders and the fresh air of outsider, there are still numerous factors which influence on去掉 the advance of one field, such as the completed results of former research, the sufficient founds, proper tentative strategy and acumen leader. Therefore, scholars should make good use of current advantage condition to research deep down their fields and absorb the novel idea from outsiders to impel the development of field greatly.

正篇文章的条理非常清楚,是很规矩的一篇文章,不出新,但保守得把意思表达得很好,但第2段的独立研究的论证不是很到位,而且分析有点偏,可注意一下.这种文章论证的着眼点不是很新颖,我觉得再在语言再出彩一点是辅助你拿到到高分的好途径.Archer的文章让人感觉很稳~
让我们在寄托里相互帮助鼓励,一同寻找生命里的寄托

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
0
寄托币
3826
注册时间
2005-8-22
精华
2
帖子
11
板凳
发表于 2006-1-17 13:26:31 |只看该作者
晕,怎么又全部是下划线了,Archer不好意思啊~~~
让我们在寄托里相互帮助鼓励,一同寻找生命里的寄托

使用道具 举报

RE: issue4 教育类高频,欢迎大家来拍,必回拍,谢谢 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
issue4 教育类高频,欢迎大家来拍,必回拍,谢谢
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-394544-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部