- 最后登录
- 2007-10-9
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 526
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2006-1-23
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 411
- UID
- 2179092
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 526
- 注册时间
- 2006-1-23
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
Education, as it is known to all is of importance for not only the younger generation but also our whole society because the youngest are the future of the world. Therefore, the speaker unnecessarily broad the assertion that education is too important to leave solely to a professional group. Parents, communities and the professional education group all play roles in the educational process. What's more, as far as i am concerned, the professional groups especially the teachers play the leading role while the parents and communities do as supplements. (As far as I'm concerned, however, the professional groups especially the teachers still play the leading role while the parents and communities do as supplements)
To begin with, all of the three including parents, communities and the educators are crucial and essential during the educational process. Firstly, the educators are specialized in designing the scientific and professional education system, and arrange the corresponding faculties to exert the plans that the educator have made. The teachers who also can be called educators have been treated in the professional colleges and universities and who pass on all their knowledge and skills of learning to their students with scientific methods. Secondly, parents are the first teachers of their children when they are too young to go to school. The parents will influence the children’s personalities and views about lives, Thirdly, the communities such as the Hope Project(in China) give a chance to the children to take part in the social activities which can make them more kindness. And most of the people in communities are the resources of the school’s financial support.
Further, it is true that the impact and function of parents and the communities can not be ignored during the children’s education process. However, the professional group plays a very different role which may(be) the leading one. The professional educators possess the irreplaceable ability. As an illustration, learning psychology is the compulsive subject for them to gain teaching skills which influence the quality of education. Without it the teaching process will be rather tough. On the other hand, the professional educators have advanced technology and machines such as the update information in the scientific field and the advanced machines in the labs, which may not be offered free for studying anywhere else.
As to parents and communities, they should be the supplement of the educators. For one thing, compared with the professional educators the parents may be more subjective. Imagine that whether a teacher would call for students’ attending additional class to be trained versatile? The answer is certainly “no” and it is their parents who will do so. Because of their absolute accounting on their children’s success in the future, some parents take themselves as educators to arrange their children’s plans and the result is somehow terrible. Every treatment should follow scientific and objective guidance, which is probably the shortcoming of the parents. For another thing, communities compared to the teachers may offer more chances for the students to take part in the social activities, yet they are(去掉are) also lack of scientific method if they do not apply to the teacher’s guidance. Therefore, this is why everyone should receive the school education.
In sum, with the comparison of the three we can assume that each of the three is essential and the educators should be the most important factor contributing to success(ful) education.
总体感觉不错,第二段简要论述parents 和 communities的作用,后两段集中论述educators的重要作用。 不过倒数第二段的最后一句(如果我没弄错的话很像中心句)会给人离题的感觉,如果把应该接受学校教育换成教育者的作用will never be overrated可能会与题目扣的更紧。
个人愚见呵呵。 |
|