TOEFL 2009上半年-Dark_Tournament写作组 wallop 第16次作业

wallopUID: 2310651

There is a general discussion as to the people fail to do few things well when they are busy doing a variety of tasks. Some people who advocate things can be arranged logically argue that people have the ability of handle many things in a short time, but people who are conscious of the key role that focus played, on the other hand, argue that task can be done well without scrupulous is far from sagacious. Coincident with the opinion of many people is my heartfelt agreement with the idea that there will be notable enhancement in work on the condition that people could pay attention just in some specific things instead of doing vast amounts of things.

In the first place, concentration is the premise on which to improve work performance. Now people in growing numbers are getting to recognize that the more focus they can keep, the better result they can get. For instance, people who work in investment bank have to face some crucial tasks which can take a tremendous profit to their company. Suppose that if they always try to do some other things with low level of importance, they will feel lack of confidence to deal with the more importance tasks. Only if People do few work can they easy to keep focus on critical things and get desiring results, multitask sometimes become a obstacle in the path to success.

In the second place, people can get valuable ideas and inspiration just in case that they have enough time to make conclusions from their job. We can point out the undeniable fact that people invariably devise new technology base on the delicious analysis of their tasks. For example, scientists spend tremendous hours on their report analysis is more than five times as much as that of doing experiments. We never can image that any exciting discovery would be found when our experts are busy doing endless lab works. To the already familiar facts, abundant further examples may be added.

Opposed to the opinion that success hardly can be acquired when people are busy doing different things are those deem that people do not make sure everything is well. There is rare situation require us to make things perfectly one by one. We just need to finish the job, and move step to the next one. Besides, a great number of things are so simple that we can handle them.

From what has been discussed above, though the acceptability that people can ignore the disadvantages of doing different things are considerable, they cannot compete with the benefits that doing things in limited numbers leads to, so we could safely draw the viewpoint that people should not always be busy doing different things if they want to doing things well.

wallopUID: 2310651

第一篇，很菜，欢迎大家拍砖

醉红尘UID: 2580929

There is a general discussion as to the people fail to do few things well when they are busy doing a variety of tasks. Some people who advocate things can be arranged logically argue that people have the ability of handle（handling） many things in a short time, but people who are conscious of the key role that focus played(为什么用played?), on the other hand, argue(arguing ) that task can be done well without scrupulous is far from sagacious. Coincident with the opinion of many people is my heartfelt agreement with the idea that there will be notable enhancement in work on the condition that people could pay attention just in some specific things instead of doing vast amounts of things.
% D$ o6 N2 c! `3 S; N! V/ y
In the first place, concentration is the premise on which to improve work performance. Now people in growing numbers are getting to recognize that the more focus they can keep, the better result they can get. For instance, people who work in investment bank have to face some crucial tasks which can take a tremendous profit (profits) to their company. Suppose that if they always try to do some other things with low level of importance, they will feel lack of confidence to deal with the more importance(important) tasks. Only if People do few work(works) can they (be)easy to keep focus on critical things and get desiring results, multitask sometimes become a (an)obstacle in the path to success.

In the second place, people can get valuable ideas and inspiration just in case that they have enough time to make conclusions from their job(jobs). We can point out the undeniable fact that people invariably devise new technology base on the delicious analysis of their tasks. For example, scientists spend tremendous hours (the tremendous hours which scientists spend) on their report analysis is more than five times as much(many) as that of doing experiments. We never can(can never) image that any exciting discovery would be found when our experts are busy doing endless lab works. To the already familiar facts, abundant further examples may be added.
& V8 C- \( u' B9 l5 i) Z+ L
(being)Opposed to the opinion that success hardly can be acquired when people are busy doing different things are those(who) deem that people do not make sure everything is well. There is rare situation require us to make things perfectly one by one. We just need to finish the job, and move step to the next one. Besides, a great number of things are so simple that we can handle them.$ A1 K8 k" q6 N, _  I. Z, k, R

From what has been discussed above, though the acceptability that people can ignore the disadvantages of doing different things are considerable, they cannot compete with the benefits that doing things in limited numbers leads to, so we could safely draw the viewpoint that people should not always be busy doing different things if they want to doing things well.

wallopUID: 2310651

3# 醉红尘

谢谢，下回自己还要再仔细检查检查