- 最后登录
- 2009-9-11
- 在线时间
- 22 小时
- 寄托币
- 69
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2009-1-29
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 51
- UID
- 2596023

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 69
- 注册时间
- 2009-1-29
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
回catheshao帮我改的作文,谢谢,请继续指教
The speaker asserts that laws cannot effectively solve out all kinds of problems in our modern society for the reason that moral behavior cannot be legislated. I fundamentally agree with this assertion insofar that problems of society couldn't be handled well with merely by laws. However, when it comes to the question whether moral behavior could be legislated, I can hardly agree with the speaker's hasty and superficial opinion.
Legal system fails to serve as a sound solution to handle the problems in our modern society because legislators are not that perfect to make perfect laws. The inherent nature of law is justice, nevertheless, it often fails to be a justifiable standard for the reason that people who make the law are in certain backgrounds.Law system serves the interests of the nation and political group in control,in this sense, it possesses unparallel positio in social system. When law reflects unjust ice, instead of solving social problems, it will make things bad to worse. Just like not the branch but the source is polluted.(我觉得在这之前介绍一下法律的作用再说不好比较好吧)由于我不知道你的意思是另外展开一段还是就在这段写,我就写在这段中了
I concede that moral behavior sometimes is out of the range of legislation. Both morality and legislation are of a certain code of conduct for social relationship, but they have obvious difference. The statement brings immediately to mind that a man who actually commits a crime exculpates because of the lack of evidence. We can't help wondering what the law could do when he is condemned by ethnic. The morality is the standard to evaluate good and evil, while the law is the foundation to measure guilt and guiltlessness. In this sense, given that the law doesn't work in some range, the extent where morality could reach is broader than law's.
However, the speaker unfortunately ignores the region where laws and morality are intertwined elements and one strengthens the other. The law serve as an indispensable element which can largely guarantee the power of morality. At the same time, morality improves dignity and effectiveness of the law. One apt illustration of this point involves the constitution which contains the basic moral principles. And to obey the law itself is one of the principles. When Bernard Madoff was charged with defrauding dozens of investors out of nearly 9 million dollars by Ponzi scheme, not only was he condemned by ethnic, but also punished by law.
To guarantee dealing with social problems more effective, some factors such as education, politics, economy and so forth are so significant that should not be overlooked. Efficient education is a useful method solving the social problems from the root, just like purifying the water from the source.It is the purpose of education to help person to be an effictive, sagacious and noble one.If a large number of these people exist in our society, social problems will decline largely. Since many troublesome problems in our social system are derived from politics or economy, it is no doubt that adjusting political and economic system serves as a sagacious solution. To guarantee to handle with social problems in a better way, it is essential to analyze the cause-and-effect relationship comprehensively.(这里最好详细展开说,应该是出彩的地方嘛)
To sum up, moral behavior is constrained by ethical principles and norms, but it is not to say moral behavior is out of control of legislation at all. Actually, the social problem is a ever-complicating issue that concerns to morality, laws, education, economy ,as well as politics, and thus cannot be analyzed from morality or laws and underestimate the others
2# catheshao |
|